Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy sets in remote sensing classification

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supervised classification in remote sensing is a very complex problem and involves steps of different nature, including a serious data preprocessing. The final objective can be stated in terms of a classification of isolated pixels between classes, which can be either previously known or not (for example, different land uses), but with no particular shape nither well defined borders. Hence, a fuzzy approach seems natural in order to capture the structure of the image. In this paper we stress that some useful tools for a fuzzy classification can be derived from fuzzy coloring procedures, to be extended in a second stage to the complete non visible spectrum. In fact, the image is considered here as a fuzzy graph defined on the set of pixels, taking advantage of fuzzy numbers in order to summarize information. A fuzzy model is then presented, to be considered as a decision making aid tool. In this way we generalize the classical definition of fuzzy partition due to Ruspini, allowing in addition a first evaluation of the quality of the classification in this way obtained, in terms of three basic indexes (measuring covering, relevance and overlapping of our family of classes).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amo A, Gomez D, Montero J, Biging G (2001) Relevance and redundancy in fuzzy classification systems. Mathware Soft Comput 8:203–216

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Amo A, Montero J, Biging G, Cutello V (2004) Fuzzy classification systems. Eur J Oper Res 156:459–507

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Amo A, Montero J, Molina E (2001) Representation of consistent recursive rules. Eur J Oper Res 130:29–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Binahi E, Rampini A (1993) Fuzzy decision-making in the classification of multisource remote-sensing data. Opt Eng 32:1193–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensaid AM, Hall LO, Bezdek JC et al. (1996) Validity-guided (re)clustering with applications to image segmentation. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems 4:112–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek JC, Harris JD (1978) Fuzzy partitions y Relations, an axiomatic basis for clustering. Fuzzy Sets Systems 1:111–127

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo T, Mayor G, Mesiar R (2002) Aggregation operators. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cutello C, Montero J (1975) Hierarchical aggregation of OWA operators: basic measures and related computational problems. Uncertainty, fuzziness and knowledge-based systems 3:17–26

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cutello V, Montero J (1999) Recursive connective rules. Int J Intell Systems 14:3–20

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cogalton RG, Green K (1999) Assessing the accuracy of remote sensed data: principles and practices. Lewis publishers, London New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1983) Ranking fuzzy numbers in the setting of possibility theory. Inf Sci 30:183–224

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher PF, Pathirana S (1990) The evaluation of fuzzy membership of land cover classes in the suburban zone. Remote Sens Environ 34:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM (1999) The continuum of classification fuzziness in thematic mappings. Photogrammetr Eng Remote Sens 65:443–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM (1996) Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-sensed data. Int J Remote Sens 17:1317–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM, Cox DP (1994) Sub-pixel land-cover composition estimation using a linear mixture model and fuzzy membership functions. Int J Remote Sens 15:619–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gath I, Geva AB (1989) Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11:773–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez D, Montero J (2004) A discussion on aggregation operators. Kybernetika 40:107–120

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez D, Montero J, Yáñez J, Poidomani C (2007) A graph coloring algorithm approach for image segmentation. Omega 35:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez D, Montero J, Yáñez J (2006) A coloring fuzzy graph approach for image classification. Inf Sci 176:3645–3657

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klement EP, Mesiar R, Pap E (2000) Triangular Norms. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Iancu I (1999) Connectives for fuzzy partitions. Fuzzy Sets Systems 101:509–512

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pardalos PM, Mavridou T, Xue J (1998) The Graph Coloring Problem: A Bibliographic Survey. In: Du DZ, Pardalos PM (eds) Handbook of combinatorial optimization, vol 2. Kluwer, Boston, pp 331–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini EH (1969) A new approach to clustering. Inf Control 15:22–32

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini EH (1970) Numerical methods for fuzzy clustering. Inf Sci 2, p 319

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele H (1996a) A characterization of Ruspini-partitions by similarity relations. In: Proceedings of the IPMU’96 conference, pp 389–394

  • Thiele H (1996b) A characterization of arbitrary Ruspini-partitions by fuzzy similarity relations. In: Proceedings of the IPMU’96 conference, pp 131–134

  • Wasilakos A, Stathakis D, Wang F (1990) Fuzzy supervised classification of remote-sensing images. Soft Comput 9(5):332–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F (1990) Fuzzy supervised classification of remote-sensing images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1993) Families of OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Systems 59:125–148

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:378–453

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Gomez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gomez, D., Montero, J. Fuzzy sets in remote sensing classification. Soft Comput 12, 243–249 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-007-0201-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-007-0201-z

Keywords

Navigation