Abstract
Artificial immune systems (AISs) have been proposed as a new computing paradigm. This paper reviews design principles of adaptive cellular immunity, based on the immunological literature rather than the simplified mathematical models which have thus far dominated the development of framework for design, interpretation, and application of AISs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aickelin U, Cayzer S (2003) The danger theory and its application to artificial immune systems. In: Timmis et al. [41], pp 141–148
Ayara M, Timmis J, de Lemos R, de Castro LN, Duncan R (2002) Negative selection: How to generate detectors. In: Timmis and Bentley [40], pp 89–98
van den Berg HA, Kiselev YN (2004) Expansion and contraction of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response—an optimal control approach. Bull Math Biol 66:1345–1369
van den Berg HA, Rand DA (2003) Antigen presentation on MHC molecules as a diversity filter that enhances immune efficacy. J Theor Biol 224:249–267
van den Berg HA, Rand DA (2004a) Dynamics of T cell activation threshold tuning. J Theor Biol 228:397–416
van den Berg HA, Rand DA (2004b) Foreigness as a matter of degree: the relative immunogenicity of peptide/MHC ligands. J Theor Biol 231:535–548
van den Berg HA, Rand DA (2007) Quantitative theories of T-cell responsiveness. Immunol Rev 216:81–92
van den Berg HA, Rand DA, Burroughs NJ (2001) A reliable and safe T cell repertoire based on low-affinity T cell receptors. J Theor Biol 209:465–486
Bersini H (2003) Self-assertion versus self-recognition: a tribute to Francisco Varela. In: Timmis et al. [41], pp 107–112
Bongrand P, Malissen B (1998) Quantitative aspects of T-cell recognition: from within the antigen-presenting cell to within the T cell. BioEssays 20:412–422
Burroughs N, Kesmir C, de Boer R (2004) Discriminating self from nonself with short peptides from large proteomes. Immunogenetics 56:311–320
Czerwinski M, Cage D, Gemmell J, Catarci T, Marshall CC, Perez-Quinones M, Skeels MM (2006) Digital memories in an era of ubiquitous computing and abundant storage. Commun ACM 49:44–50
Davis SJ, Ikemizu S, Evans EJ, Fugger L, Bakker TR, van der Merwe PA (2003) The nature of molecular recognition by T cells. Nat Immunol 4:1–8
de Castro LN, Timmis JI (2003) Artificial immune systems as a novel soft computing paradigm. Soft Comput 7(8):526–544
de Castro LN, von Zuben FJ (eds) (2005) Recent developments in biologically inspired computing. Idea Group, January 2005
Dunkin MA (1999) A maverick researcher bucks the establishment. In: Arthritis today magazine, March–April 1999
Gallucci S, Matzinger P (2001) Danger signals: SOS to the immune system. Curr Opin Immunol 13:114–119
Goldberg DE (1988) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison Wesley, Reading
Goldrath AW, Bevan MJ (1999) Selecting and maintaining a diverse T-cell repertoire. Nature 402:255–262
Goldstein B, Faeder JR, Hlavacek W (2004) Mathematical and computational models of immune-receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 4:445–456
González F, Dasgupta D (2003) Neuro-immune and self-organizing map approaches to anomaly detection: a comparison. In: Timmis et al. [41], pp 203–211
Hershberg U, Efroni S (2001) The immune system and other cognitive systems. Complexity 6:14–21
Hone A, van den Berg HA (2007) Mathematical analysis of artificial immune system dynamics and performance. In: Flower D, Timmis J (eds) Silico immunology. Springer, Heidelberg
Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F (2000) Dynamics of T lymphocyte responses: intermediates, effectors, and memory cells. Science 290:92–97
Lanzi PL (2008) Learning classifier systems: then and now. Evol Intel 1:63–82
Matzinger P (2001) Essay 1: the danger model in its historical context. Scand J Immunol 54:4–9
Miller JFAP, Kurts C, Allison J, Kosaka H, Carbone F, Heath WR (1998) Induction of peripheral CD 8+ T cell tolerance by cross-presentation of self antigens. Immunol Rev 165:267–277
Müller V, Bonhoeffer S (2003) Quantitative constraints on the scope of negative selection. TRENDS Immunol 24:132–135
Neal M, Timmis J (2005) Once more unto the breach: towards artifical homeostasis? In: de Castro, von Zuben [15], pp 340–365
Nicosia G, Cutello V, Bentley P, Timmis J (eds) (2004) Third international conference on artificial immune systems, September 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3239. Springer, Heidelberg
Perelson AS, Oster GF (1979) Theoretical studies of clonal selection: minimal antibody repertoire size and reliability of self-non-self discrimination. J Theor Biol 81:645–670
Rojas R (1996) Neural networks: a systematic introduction. Springer, Heidelberg
Roncarolo M-G, Levings MK (2000) The role of different subsets of T regulatory cells in controlling autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol 12:676–683
Sansom DM (2000) CD28, CTLA-4 and their ligands: Who does what and to whom? Immunology 101:169–177
Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
Stepney S (2007) Embodiment. In: Flower D, Timmis J (eds) Silico immunology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 265–288
Stepney S, Smith RE, Timmis J, Tyrell AM (2004) Towards a conceptual framework for artificial immune systems. In Nicosia et al. [30], pp 53–64
Stevanović S, Schild H (1999) Quantitative aspects of T cell activation—peptide generation and editing by MHC class I molecule. Semin Immunol 11:375–384
Timmis J, Andrews P, Owens N, Clark E (2008) An interdisciplinary perspective on artificial immune systems. Evol Intel 1:5–26
Timmis J, Bentley P (eds) (2002) 1st International conference on artificial immune systems. University of Kent at Canterbury, September 2002
Timmis J, Bentley P, Hart E (eds) (2003) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on artificial immune systems, September 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2787. Springer, Heidelberg
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Andrew Hone, David Rand, Colin Johnson, Mark Neal, Jon Timmis, Susan Stepney, as well as two anonymous referees for stimulating discussions and suggestions. Support from the ARTIST network is gratefully acknowledged: http://www.artificial-immune-systems.org/artist.ht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An earlier version of this work was presented as a position paper at the ARTIST Network for Artificial Immune Systems meeting held on 8th–9th November 2004.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van den Berg, H.A. Design principles of adaptive cellular immunity for artificial immune systems. Soft Comput 13, 1073–1080 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-008-0380-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-008-0380-2