Abstract
Most of the current failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) methods use the risk priority number (RPN) value to evaluate the risk of failure. However, the traditional RPN methodology has been criticized to have several shortcomings. These shortcomings are addressed in this paper. Therefore, an efficient and simplified algorithm to evaluate the risk of failure is needed. This paper proposes a new approach, which utilizes the intuitionistic fuzzy set ranking technique for reprioritization of failures in a system FMECA. The proposed approach has two major advantages: (1) it resolves some of the shortcomings of the traditional RPN method, and (2) it provides an evaluation of the redundancy place, which can assist the designer in making correct decisions to make a safer and more reliable product design. In numerical verification, an FMECA of a silane supply system is presented as a numerical example. After comparing results from the proposed method and two other approaches, this research found that the proposed approach can reduce more duplicate RPN numbers and get a more accurate, reasonable risk ranking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atanassov KT (1983) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Central Tech Library, Bulgarian Academy Science, Sofia. Report no. 1697(84)
Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
Bowles JB (2003) An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis. In: Processing annual reliability and maintainability symposium, pp 380–386
Bowles JB, Pelaez CE (1995) Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure modes, effects and criticality analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 50:203–213. doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-D
Chang JR, Chang KH, Liao SH, Cheng CH (2006) The reliability of general vague fault-tree analysis on weapon systems fault diagnosis. Soft Comput 10:531–542. doi:10.1007/s00500-005-0483-y
Ford Motor Company (1988) Potential failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) reference manual
Pillay A, Wang J (2003) Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79:69–85. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00179-5
Sankar NR, Prabhu BS (2001) Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 18:324–335. doi:10.1108/02656710110383737
Seyed-Hosseini SM, Safaei N, Asgharpour MJ (2006) Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:872–881. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.09.005
US Department of Defense Washington, DC (1980) Procedures for performing a failure mode effects and criticality analysis, US MIL-STD-1629A
Wang CL (2006) Use FMEA to assess the safety of silane supply system-take TFT-LCD factory as an example. National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
Wang J, Ruxton T, Labrie CR (1995) Design for safety of engineering systems with multiple failure state variables. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 50:271–284. doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00094-1
Xu K, Tang LC, Xie M, Ho SL, Zhu ML (2002) Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75:17–29. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00101-6
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Contr 8:338–353. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, KH., Cheng, CH. & Chang, YC. Reprioritization of failures in a silane supply system using an intuitionistic fuzzy set ranking technique. Soft Comput 14, 285–298 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0403-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0403-7