Skip to main content
Log in

Method of verifying declared identity in optical answer sheets

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the use of optical answer sheet examinations, occasionally the identity of the examinee is in question. A novel method for characterizing the personal quality of mark shapes in optically read answer sheets is described. The method may be used to identify imposters in multiple choice examinations. All the marks are segmented and measured in multiple parameters including area, dimensions, perimeter and optical density. Imposter decisions are made on the collected data by comparing an identified test form against the form in question in comparison with a population using SVM (support vector machine) modeling. In testing the method, 300 test forms from 100 examinees from past tests were used. An EER (equal error rate) of 15–17% was found. While performance of the presented method is currently insufficient for practical purposes, future research options have been mentioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arazi B (1977) Handwriting identification by means of run-length measurements. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 7:878–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulacu M, Schomaker L (2003) Writer style from oriented edge fragments. Lecture notes in computer science, pp 460–469

  • Bulacu M, Schomaker L, Brink A (2007) Text-independent writer identification and verification using textural and allographic features. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29:701–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges CJC (1998) A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining Knowl Discov 2:1–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Franke K, Rose S (2004) Ink-deposition model: the relation of writing and ink deposition processes. In: Proceedings of the ninth international workshop on frontiers in handwriting recognition. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp 173–178

  • Gluhchev G, Thomas F (2005) Automatic slope evaluation of handwritten text. Int Confer Comput Syst Technol IIIA.10-1–IIIA.10-4

  • Hayes WL (1963) Statistics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc., New York

  • Image Pro Plus [computer program] (2002) Version 4.5 for Windows. Media Cybernetics Inc., Bethesda

  • Joachims T (1999) Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In: Joachims T, Schölkopf B, Burges C, Smola A (eds) Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets BN et al (1967) Identification and differentiation of handwritings with the help of electronic computers (in Russian). Defense Technical Information Center

  • Maarse FJ, Schomaker LRB, Teulings HL (1988) Automatic identification of writers. In: Conference of the Dutch psychonomic Society on human–computer interaction: psychonomic aspects table of contents, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. New York, pp 353–360

  • Martin A, Doddington G, Kamm T, Ordowski M, Przybocki M (1997) The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance. In: Proceedings of the 5th European conference on speech communication and technology: eurospeech; 1997 September 22–25; Rhodes, Greece, pp 1895–1898

  • Mikkilineni AK, Arslan O, Chiang PJ, Kumontoy RM, Allebach JP, Chiu GTC et al (2005) Printer forensics using SVM techniques. In: Proceedings of the IS&T’s NIP21: international conference on digital printing technologies; 2005 September 18–23, Baltimore, MD, pp 223–226

  • Niels R, Vuurpijl L, Schomaker L (2007) Automatic allograph matching in forensic writer identification. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 21:61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özgündüz E, Şentürk T, Karshgil ME (2005) Offline Signature Verification and Recognition by Support Vector Machine. In: European signal processing conference, EUSIPCO

  • Pervouchine V, Leedham G (2007) Extraction and analysis of forensic document examiner features used for writer identification. Pattern Recognit 40:1004–1013

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Plamondon R et al (2000) Online and off-line handwriting recognition: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22:63–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schomaker L, Bulacu M, Franke K (2004) Automatic writer identification using fragmented connected-component contours. In: Frontiers in handwriting recognition, 2004. IWFHR-9 2004. Ninth international workshop on frontiers in handwriting recognition, pp 185–190

  • Slavík P, Govindaraju V (2000) An overview of run-length encoding of handwritten word images. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, State University of New York at Buffalo

  • Vapnik VN (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their appreciation to Prof. Naftali Schweitzer and Dr. Victor Neeman for their indispensable assistance in guiding and counseling in the answer sheet processing activities and to the National Institute for Testing and Evaluation for supplying the answer sheet samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph A. Levi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levi, J.A., Solewicz, Y.A., Dvir, Y. et al. Method of verifying declared identity in optical answer sheets. Soft Comput 15, 461–468 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0526-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0526-x

Keywords

Navigation