Skip to main content
Log in

New measures of homogeneity for image processing: an application to fingerprint segmentation

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we axiomatically describe the concepts of total homogeneity and local homogeneity of a fuzzy set. We also present different construction methods by means of restricted equivalence functions, restricted dissimilarity functions and implication operators. We show that the most common homogeneity expressions can be obtained as particular cases of the constructions developed here. The usefulness of these functions is shown in segmentation of fingerprint images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baczynski M, Jayaram B (2008) Fuzzy implications. In: Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 231. Springer, Berlin

  • Barrenechea E, Bustince H, De Baets B, Lopez-Molina C (2011) Construction of interval-valued fuzzy relations with application to the generation of fuzzy edge images. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 19:819–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazen AM, Gerez SH (2001) Segmentation of fingerprint images. In: ProRISC 2001 workshop on circuits, systems and, signal processing, pp 276–280

  • Bazen AM, Gerez SH (2002) Systematic methods for the computation of the directional fields and singular points of fingerprints. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 24:905–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beliakov G, Pradera A, Calvo T (2007) Aggregation functions: a guide for practitioners. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustince H, Burillo P, Soria F (2003) Automorphisms, negations and implication operators. Fuzzy Set Syst 134:209–229

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bustince H, Barrenechea E, Pagola M (2006) Restricted equivalence functions. Fuzzy Set Syst 157:2333–2346

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bustince H, Barrenechea E, Pagola M (2007) Image thresholding using restricted equivalence functions and maximizing the measures of similarity. Fuzzy Set Syst 158:496–516

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bustince H, Montero J, Barrenechea E, Pagola M (2007) Semiautoduality in a restricted family of aggregation operators. Fuzzy Set Syst 158:1360–1377

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bustince H, Barrenechea E, Pagola M (2008) Relationship between restricted dissimilarity functions, restricted equivalence functions and normal E-N-functions: image thresholding invariant. Pattern Recogn Lett 29:525–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustince H, Jurio A, Pradera A, Mesiar R, Beliakov G (2013) Generalization of the weighted voting method using penalty functions constructed via faithful restricted dissimilarity functions. Eur J Oper Res 225:472–478

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo T, Kolesárová A, Komorníková M, Mesiar R (2002) Aggregation operators: properties, classes and construction methods. In: Calvo T, Mayor G, Mesiar R (eds) Aggregation operators. Physica-Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg, pp 3–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng HD, Chen CH, Chiu HH (1997) Image segmentation using fuzzy homogeneity criterion. Inf Sci 98:237–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng HD, Chen CH, Chiu HH, Xu HJ (1998) Fuzzy homogeneity approach to multilevel thresholding. IEEE Trans Image Process 7:1084–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng HD, Xue M, Shi XJ (2003) Contrast enhancement based on a novel homogeneity measurement. Pattern Recogn 36:2687–2697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutello V, Montero J (1999) Recursive connective rules. Int J Intell Syst 14:3–20

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Del Amo A, Montero J, Molina E (2001) Representation of consistent recursive rules. Eur J Oper Res 130:29–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Galun M, Sharon E, Basri R, Brandt A (2003) Texture segmentation by multiscale aggregation of filter responses and shape elements. In: Ninth IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp 716–723

  • Gomez D, Montero J (2004) A discussion on aggregation operators. Kybern 40:107–120

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (1992) Digital image processing. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain A, Hong L, Bolle R (1997) On-line fingerprint verification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 19:302–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain AK, Prabhakar S, Hong L (1999) A multichannel approach to fingerprint classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 21:348–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karu K, Jain AK (1996) Fingerprint classification. Pattern Recogn 29:389–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ, Folger TA (1987) Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HC, Gaensslen RE (1991) Advances in fingerprint technology. Elsevier, New York

  • Li Y, Shen Y (2010) An automatic fuzzy c-means algorithm for image segmentation. Soft Comput 14:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Martino F, Loia V, Sessa S (2010) Fuzzy transforms for compression and decompression of color videos. Inf Sci 180:3914–3931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas M, Monserrat M, Torrens J, Trillas E (2007) A survey on fuzzy implication functions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:1107–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal SK, Pal NR (1987) Segmentation using contrast and homogeneity measures. Pattern Recogn Lett 5:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panetta KA, Wharton EJ, Agaian SS (2008) Human visual system-based image enhancement and logarithmic contrast measure. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cy B 38:174–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ville D, Nachtegael M, Van der Weken D, Kerre EE, Philips W, Lemahieu I (2003) Noise reduction by fuzzy image filtering. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 11:429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Weken D, Nachtegael M, Kerre EE (2004) Using similarity measures and homogeneity for the comparison of images. Image Vision Comput 22:695–702

  • Xuecheng L (1992) Entropy, distance measure and similarity measure of fuzzy sets and their relations. Fuzzy Set Syst 52:305–318

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang GP, Zhou GT, Yin YL, Yang, XK (2010) K-means based fingerprint segmentation with sensor interoperability. Eur J Adv Signal Process 729378

  • Zadeh LA (1975) Concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning.1. Inf Sci 8:199–249

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang QZ, Yan H (2004) Fingerprint classitication based on extraction and analysis of singularities and pseudo ridges. Pattern Recogn 37:2233–2243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Song J, Dai G, Lyu MR (2006) Extraction of line segments and circular arcs from freehand strokes based on segmental homogeneity features. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 36:300–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Jurio.

Additional information

Communicated by T.-P. Hong.

This paper has been partially supported by the Research Services of the Universidad Publica de Navarra and by the National Science Foundation of Spain, references TIN2010-15055 and TIN2011-29520.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jurio, A., Bustince, H., Pagola, M. et al. New measures of homogeneity for image processing: an application to fingerprint segmentation. Soft Comput 18, 1055–1066 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-1126-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-1126-3

Keywords

Navigation