Skip to main content
Log in

A fuzzy MCDM method and an application to solid transportation problem with mode preference

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we propose a computationally efficient fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (FMCDM) method. For this purpose we define a ranking function based on credibility measure to rank a fuzzy number over another fuzzy number. A comparative result of our proposed ranking method with the other well known methods is provided. The proposed FMCDM method is successfully applied to find most preferred transportation mode among available modes with respect to some evaluation criteria for a solid transportation problem (STP). Here the evaluation ratings of the alternatives and criteria weights are presented in terms of linguistic variables. The importance weights of the available transportation modes as obtained by this method are then assigned to the STP. Numerical example is provided to illustrate the proposed method and problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasbandy S, Asady B (2006) Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance. Inf Sci 176:2405–2416

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Abbasbandy S, Hajjari T (2009) A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Comput Math Appl 57:413–419

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Anand MD, Kumanan TSS, Johnny MA (2008) Application of multi-criteria decision making for selection of robotic system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Manag Decis Mak 9(1):75–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Asady B, Zendehnam A (2007) Ranking fuzzy numbers by distance minimization. Appl Math Model 31:2589–2598

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chan FTS, Kumar N (2007) Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega 35(4):417–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CT (2000) Extensions to the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S (1985) Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17:113–129

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SJ, Hwang CL, Hwang FP (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Lect Notes Econ Math Syst 375:1–531

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CH (1998) A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets Syst 95:307–317

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CH, Lin Y (2002) Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 142:174–186

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou HK, Tzeng GH, Cheng DC (2005) Evaluating sustainable fishing development strategies using fuzzy MCDM approach. Omega 33(3):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu T-C, Tsao C-T (2002) Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point. Comput Math Appl 43:111–117

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ding J-F, Liang G-S (2005) Using fuzzy MCDM to select pertners selection of strategic alliances for linear shipping. Inf Sci 173:197–225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JS, Fishburn PC, Steuer RE, Wallenius J, Zionts S (1992) Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: the next ten years. Manag Sci 38(5):645–654

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ertay T, Buyukozkan G, Kahraman C, Ruan D (2005) Quality function deployment implementation based on analytical network process with linguistic data: an application in automotive industry. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 16(3):221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskigun E, Uzsoy R, Preckel PV, Beaujon G, Krishnan S, Tew JD (2005) Outbound supply chain network design with mode selection, lead times and capacitated vehical destribution centers. Eur J Oper Res 165:182–206

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fortemps P, Roubens M (1996) Ranking and defuzzification methods based on area compensation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 82:319–330

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haley KB (1962) The sold transportation problem. Oper Res 10:448–463

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M (2011) An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment. Omega 39:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Application. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesmüller GP, de Kok AG, Fransoo JC (2005) Transportation mode selection with positive manufacturing lead time. Transp Res Part E 41:5110530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumru M, Kumru PY (2013) Analytic hierarchy process application in selecting the mode of transport for a logistics company. Journal of Advanced Transportation. doi:10.1002/atr.1240

  • Kundu P, Kar S, Maiti M (2013) Multi-objective multi-item solid transportation problem in fuzzy environment. Appl Math Model 37:2028–2038

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu P, Kar S, Maiti M (2013) Multi-objective solid transportation problems with budget constraint in uncertain environment. International Journal of Systems Science. doi:10.1080/00207721.2012.748944

  • Lee HS (2005) A fuzzy mulyi-criteria decision making model for the selection of the distribution center. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3612:1290–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2009) Theory and practice of uncertain programming, 3rd edn. UTLAB. http://orsc.edu.cn/liu/up.pdf

  • Liu B, Liu YK (2002) Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10:445–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou TS, Wang MJ (1992) Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets Syst 50(3):247–255

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov L, Sing MG (2003) Fuzzy analytic network process and its application to the development of decision support sustems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 33(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov L, Tsvetinov P (2004) Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Appl Soft Comput 5:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty RP, Agarwal R, Choudhury AK, Tiwari MK (2005) A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R\(\partial \)D project selection: a case study. Int J Prod Res 43(24):5199–5216

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan JP, Berger PD (1977) A transportation mode selection model for a consolidation warehouse system. Math Method Oper Res 21(5):211–222

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Patel G, Tripathy J (1989) The solid transportation problem and its variants. Int J Manag Syst 5:17–36

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Punakivi M, Hinkka V (2006) Selection criteria of transportation mode: a case study in four finnish industrial sectors. Transport Rev 26(2):207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu L, Chen Y, Mu X (2008) A Transport Mode Selection Method for Multimodal Transportation Based on an Adaptive ANN System. In: proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Natural Computation, ICNC ’08, vol 3, pp 436–440

  • Saaty TL (2001) The analytical network process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

  • Tuzkaya UR, Önüt S (2008) A fuzzy analytical network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: a case study. Inf Sci 178:3133–3146

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Lee CY (2005) Production and transport logistics scheduling with two transport mode choices. Naval Res Logist 52:796–809

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YJ (2011) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on positive and negetive extreme solutions. Appl Math Model 35:1994–2004

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Elhag TMS (2006) Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Syst Appl 31:309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YJ, Lee HS, Lin K (2003) Fuzzy TOPSIS for multi-criteria decision-making. Int Math J 3(4):367–379

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YJ, Lee HS (2007) Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making. Comput Math Appl 53:1762–1772

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Yang JB, Xu DL, Chin KS (2006) On the centroids of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:919–926

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Liu L (2007) Fuzzy fixed charge solid transportation problem and algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 7:879–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Y (1991) Criteria for evaluating fuzzy ranking methods. Fuzzy Sets Syst 44:139–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samarjit Kar.

Additional information

Communicated by R. John.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kundu, P., Kar, S. & Maiti, M. A fuzzy MCDM method and an application to solid transportation problem with mode preference. Soft Comput 18, 1853–1864 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-1161-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-1161-0

Keywords

Navigation