Skip to main content
Log in

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition for 3-objective optimization problems with objectives in different scales

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Multiobjective Optimization problems the objective functions may have different scales, which leads to a neglecting of one or more objective functions. The most common-used way in the literature to solve this drawback is to normalize the objective space; however, a set of uniformly distributed solutions in the normalized objective space may not be uniformly distributed in the original objective space with more than two objective functions. In this work, we present an improved version of the Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOEA/D) which incorporates a new aggregation technique based on the Normal Boundary Intersection approach and the Tchebycheff approach (MOEA/D-NBI) for solving 3-objective optimization problems with different scales of objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Das I, Dennis JE (1998) Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J Optim 8(3):631–657

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2001) Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, New York

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Thiele L, Laumanns M, Zitzler E (2001) Scalable test problems for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Tech. rep., Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH)

  • Gunzburger M, Bukardt J (2004) Technical Report Florida State University (available online http://people.sc.fsu.edu/jburkardt/pdf/ptmeas.pdf) (2004)

  • Hancock B, Mattson C (2013) The smart normal constraint method for directly generating a smart pareto set. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 48(4):763–775

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero JM, Reynoso-Meza G, Martínez M, Blasco X, Sanchis J (2014) A smart-distributed pareto front using ev-moga evolutionary algorithm. Int J Artif Intell Tools. doi:10.1142/S021821301450002X

  • Knowles JD, Corne D (2000) Approximating the nondominated front using the pareto archived evolution strategy. Evolut Comput 8(2):149–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Zhang Q (2009) Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 13(2):284–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson CA, Mullur AA, Messac A (2004) Smart Pareto filter: obtaining a minimal representation of multiobjective design space. Eng Optim 36(6):721–740

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen K (1999) Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. In: International series in operations research and management science, vol 12. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  • Zhang Q, Li H (2007) MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 11(6):712–731. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Li H, Maringer D, Tsang E (2010) MOEA/D with NBI-style Tchebycheff approach for portfolio management. IEEE Cong Evolut Comput (CEC), pp 1–8

  • Zhang Q, Zhou A, Zhao S, Suganthan PN, Liu W, Tiwari S (2008) Multiobjective optimization test instances for the congress on evolutionary computation (CEC’09) 2009 special session and competition. Working report, CES-887, School of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Essex

  • Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2002) SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. In: Proceedings of evolutionary methods for design, optimization, and control with applications to industrial problems (EUROGEN’02), pp 95–100

  • Zitzler E, Thiele L, Laumanns M, Fonseca C, da Fonseca V (2003) Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 7(2):117–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the ERDF (European Regional Development Fund), under the contract TIN2012-30685 (BIO project). A. Rubio-Largo is supported by the postdoc research grant ACCION-III-13 from the University of Extremadura.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Álvaro Rubio-Largo.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Castiglione.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rubio-Largo, Á., Zhang, Q. & Vega-Rodríguez, M.A. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition for 3-objective optimization problems with objectives in different scales. Soft Comput 19, 157–166 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1239-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1239-3

Keywords

Navigation