Abstract
Quantum algorithms can be generally represented as the dynamical evolution of an input quantum register, with the action of each logical gate, as well as of any transmission channel, defined by some quantum propagator. From a global viewpoint, this unitary dynamics is ruled by the flow of a continuous time, and the possible splitting into shorter logical sub-units is nothing but a harmless, though useful, zooming process. On the other hand, understanding how elementary units of the quantum register, namely single qubits, are actually hauled along the algorithm, is a more complex matter, as it involves the dynamical entanglement generation entailed in the action of two-qubit gates. In this work, we first review how the essential elements of quantum algorithms can be described in terms of dynamical processes, and then analyze the corresponding non-unitary dynamics of single qubits, by referring to the formalism adopted in the study of open quantum systems. We show that single qubits evolution cannot be split into intervals shorter than the typical time needed by two-qubit gates for accomplishing their task, which somehow gives a rhythmical structure to the algorithm itself. We further point out that the local evolution entails a memory, in that the way each qubit takes an infinitesimally small step forward in time, is set by its previous history, back to the instant when it entered the last two-qubit gate. This memory originates from quantum correlations, and it is suggested to play an essential role in quantum information processing. As a concluding remark, we just touch on the idea that a similar analysis could be put forward for getting a clue on how we extract meaningful contents out of complex informational input.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/803f7/803f7677c5c5458c6b1bf548fe34feb7e186e2a0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7341/d734169f064315aea658190d3d081eac12fb6766" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca2bb/ca2bb572ff2cd2eb8b01b90325fad9b20d7df45c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4df25/4df25f1b14081b84bbd96d49771ecbaacdbf9634" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a039/1a03921e7189fa7a8a901265c8162bc61d766b76" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/708bb/708bb7648cf90be83ed0ab2d6fa32c3b96a4fdcd" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Banchi L, Apollaro TJG, Cuccoli A, Vaia R, Verrucchi P (2011) Long quantum channels for high-quality entanglement transfer. New J Phys 13(123006):20
Breuer HP, Petruccione F (2002) The theory of open quantum systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dalla Chiara M, Giuntini R, Negri E, Luciani R (2012) From quantum information to musical semantics. College Publications, London
DiVincenzo DP (1995) Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation. Phys Rev A 51(2):1015–1022
Ekert A, Jozsa R (1998) Quantum algorithms: entanglement enhanced information processing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 356:1769–1782
Jozsa R (1997) Entanglement and quantum computation. In: Huggett S, Mason L, Tod KP, Tsou ST, Woodhouse NMJ (eds) Geometric issues in the foundations of science. The Geometric Universe, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Nielsen MA, Chuang IL (2000) Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rivas A, Huelga SF (2012) Springerbriefs in physics., Open quantum systems: an introductionSpringer, New York
Schlosshauer M (2007) Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. Springer, Berlin
Wheeler JA, Zurek WH (eds) (1983) Quantum theory and measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara and Prof. Elena Castellani for fruitful discussions and support. This work is done in the framework of the Convenzione operativa between the Institute for Complex Systems of the Italian National Research Council, and the Physics and Astronomy Department of the Univeristy of Florence.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Communicated by M. L. Dalla Chiara, R. Giuntini, E. Negri and S. Smets.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonzio, S., Verrucchi, P. The rhythm of quantum algorithms. Soft Comput 21, 1515–1521 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-1915-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-1915-y