Skip to main content
Log in

Additively reciprocal fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices and multiplicative fuzzy priorities

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transformations between multiplicatively and additively reciprocal fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices are dealt with, and formulas for obtaining multiplicative fuzzy priorities from additively reciprocal fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices are proposed in this paper. The formulas are based on the concept of constrained fuzzy arithmetic and preserve the additive reciprocity of pairwise comparisons. Further, the consistency issue is approached in the paper; the consistency check is employed directly in the formulas for obtaining multiplicative fuzzy priorities of objects both from multiplicatively and additively reciprocal fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices. Two definitions of consistency based on transitivity are employed in this paper—the traditional additive/multiplicative transitivity and the weak consistency. However, also several other transitivity conditions are discussed in this context. Finally, the proposed formulas for obtaining multiplicative fuzzy priorities from an additively reciprocal fuzzy pairwise comparison matrix and the formulas with employed consistency check are applied in an illustrative example. Triangular fuzzy numbers are used for the fuzzy extension in this paper. However, all the formulas can be modified easily to be applied on intervals, trapezoidal fuzzy numbers or any other fuzzy numbers given by \(\alpha \)-cuts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alcalá-Fdez J, Porcel C (2008) A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values. Int J Intell Syst 23:155–175 Wiley InterScience

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Basile L, D’Apuzzo L (2002) Weak consistency and quasi-linear means imply the actual ranking. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 10:227–239

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek JC, Spillman B, Spillman R (1978) A fuzzy relational space for group decision theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2:255–268 Elsevier

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrerizo J, Ureña MR, Pedrycz W, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) Building consensus in group decision making with an allocation of information granularity. Fuzzy Sets Syst 255:115–127 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2009) Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:14–23 IEEE Computational Intelligence Society

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conde E, Pérez M (2010) A linear optimization problem to derive relative weights using an interval judgement matrix. Eur J Oper Res 201:537–544 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford G, Williams C (1985) A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices. J Math Psychol 29:25–40 Elsevier

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Baets B, De Meyer H, De Schuymer B, Jenei S (2006) Cyclic evaluation of transitivity of reciprocal relations. Soc Choice Welf 26:217–238 Springer

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra TK (2013) On the extraction of weights from pairwise comparison matrices. Central Eur J Oper Res 21:103–123 Springer

  • Dong YC, Zhang GQ, Hong WC, Xu YF (2013) Linguistic computational model based on 2-tuples and intervals. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21:1006–1018 IEEE Computational Intelligence Society

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Chen X, Li CC, Hong WC, Xu Y (2015) Consistency issues of interval pairwise comparison matrices. Soft Comput 19:2321–2355 Springer

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Consistency driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic GDM with preference relation. IEEE Trans Cybern 45:72–780 IEEE Computational Intelligence Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Enea M, Piazza T (2004) Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP. Fuzzy Optim Decision Mak 3:39–62 Springer

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fedrizzi M (1990) On a consensus measure in a group MDM problem. Multiperson decision making using fuzzy sets and possibility theory, vol 18. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 231–241

  • Fedrizzi M, Brunelli M (2010) On the priority vector associated with a reciprocal relation and a pairwise comparison matrix. Soft Comput 14:545–639 Springer

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fedrizzi M, Giove S (2013) Optimal sequencing in incomplete pairwise comparisons for large-dimensional problems. Int J General Syst 42:366–375 Taylor & Francis

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gavalec M, Ramík J, Zimmermann K (2015) Decision making and optimization. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Springer, New York, p 667

  • Genç S, Boran FE, Akay D, Xu Z (2010) Interval multiplicative transitivity for consistency, missing values and priority weights of interval fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 180:4877–4891 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martinez L, Sanchez PJ (2005) Managing non-homogenous information in group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 166:115–132 Elsevier

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends prospects. Fuzzy Optim Decision Mak 8:337–364 Springer

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 3:98–109 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu M, Ren P, Lan J, Wang J, Zheng W (2014) Note on “‘Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations”’. Eur J Oper Res 2014:771–773 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ishizaka A, Nguyen NH (2013) Calibrated fuzzy AHP for current bank account selection. Expert Syst Appl 40:3775–3783 Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J (1986) Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 18:105–118 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ, Pan Y (1998) Constrained fuzzy arithmetic: basic questions and some answers. Soft Comput 2:100–108 Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krejčí J (2014) Fuzzy maximal eigenvalues of fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices. In: Proceedings of the 32th international conference on mathematical methods in economics 2014, Olomouc, Czech Republic, ISBN: 978-80-244-4209-9

  • Krejčí J, Stoklasa J (2015) Fuzzified AHP in the evaluation of scientific monographs. Central Eur J Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10100-015-0399-2

  • Krejčí J, Talašová J (2013) A proper fuzzification of Saaty’s scale and an improved method for computing fuzzy weights in fuzzy AHP. In: Proceedings of the 31th international conference on mathematical methods in economics 2013, Jihlava, Czech Republic. ISBN: 978-80-87035-76-4

  • Liu F (2009) Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160:2686–2700 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Massanet S, Riera JV, Torrens J, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) A new linguistic computational model based on discrete fuzzy numbers for computing with words. Inf Sci 258:277–290 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Morente-Molinera JA, Pérez IJ, Ureña MR, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) On multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modeling in group decision making problems: a systematic review and future trends. Knowl Based Syst 74:49–60 Elsevier

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi H (1981) Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 6:249–259 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramík J (2010) Inconsistency of pair-wise comparison matrix with fuzzy elements based on geometrc mean. Fuzzy Sets Syst 161:1604–1613 Elsevier

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini E (1969) A new approach to clustering. Inf Control 15:22–32 Springer

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stoklasa J, Jandová V, Talašová J (2013) Weak consistency in Saaty’s AHP—evaluating creative work outcomes of Czech Art Colleges. Neural Netw World 23:61–77 Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Computer Science

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12:117–131 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia García JM, Del Moral MJ, Martínez MA, Herrera-Viedma E (2012) A consensus model for group decision making problems with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 39:10022–10030 Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ureña R, Chiclana F, Morente-Molinera JA, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Managing incomplete preference relations in decision making: a review and future trends. Inf Sci 302:14–32 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ureña R, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Confidence-consistency driven group decision making approach with incomplete reciprocal intuitionistic preference relations. Knowl Based Syst. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.020

  • van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11:229–241 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Chin KS (2011) Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: a logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology. Int J Approx Reason 52:541–553 Elsevier

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context. Appl Soft Comput 35:827–839 Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Chiclana F (2014) Multiplicative consistency of intuitionistic reciprocal preference relations and its application to missing values estimation and consesus building. Knowl Based Syst 71:187–200 Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS, Chen J (2008) Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154:266–280 Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Inf Control 8:338–353 Elsevier

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) Concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning I. II. Inf Sci 8:199–249 301–357, 9:43–820, Elsevier

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana Krejčí.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krejčí, J. Additively reciprocal fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices and multiplicative fuzzy priorities. Soft Comput 21, 3177–3192 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-2000-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-2000-2

Keywords

Navigation