Skip to main content
Log in

Establishing the relationship matrix in QFD based on fuzzy regression models with optimized h values

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In quality function deployment (QFD), establishing the relationship matrix is quite an important step to transform ambiguous and qualitative customer requirements into concrete and quantitative technical characteristics. Owing to the inherent imprecision and fuzziness of the matrix, the fuzzy linear regression (FLR) is gradually applied into QFD to establish it. However, with regard to an FLR model, the h value is a critical parameter whose setting is always an aporia and it is commonly determined by decision makers. To a certain extent, this subjective assignment fades the effectiveness of FLR in the application of QFD. Aiming to this problem, FLR models with optimized parameters h obtained by maximizing system credibility are introduced into QFD in this paper, in which relationship coefficients are assumed as asymmetric triangular fuzzy numbers. Moreover, a systematic approach is developed to identify the relationship matrix in QFD, whose application is demonstrated through a packing machine example. The final results show that FLR models with optimized h values can always achieve a more reliable relationship matrix. Besides, a comparative study on symmetric and asymmetric cases is elaborated detailedly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akao Y (1990) Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design, translated by glenn mazur. Productivity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Chen Y, Zhou J, Liu Y (2016) Optimizing \(h\) value for fuzzy linear regression with asymmetric triangular fuzzy coefficients. Eng Appl Artif Intell 47:16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Fung RYK, Tang J (2005) Fuzzy expected value modelling approach for determining target values of engineering characteristics in QFD. Int J Prod Res 43(17):3583–3604

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Fung RYK, Tang J (2006) Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator. Eur J Oper Res 174(3):1553–1556

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Ngai EWT (2008) A fuzzy QFD program modelling approach using the method of imprecision. Int J Prod Res 46(24):6823–6840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Tang J, Fung RYK, Ren Z (2004) Fuzzy regression-based mathematical programming model for quality function deployment. Int J Prod Res 42(5):1009–1027

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fung RYK, Chen Y, Tang J (2006) Estimating the functional relationships for quality function deployment under uncertainties. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157(1):98–120

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fung RYK, Popplewell K, Xie J (1998) An intelligent hybrid system for customer requirements analysis and product attribute targets determination. Int J Prod Res 36(1):13–34

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser JR, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harv Bus Rev 66(3):63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):16–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ishibuchi H, Nii M (2001) Fuzzy regression using asymmetric fuzzy coefficients and fuzzified neural networks. Fuzzy Sets Syst 119(2):273–290

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karsak EE (2008) Robot selection using an integrated approach based on quality function deployment and fuzzy regression. Int J Prod Res 46(3):723–738

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KJ, Moskowitz H, Dhingra A, Evans G (2000) Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment. Eur J Oper Res 121(3):504–518

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KJ, Moskowitz H, Koksalan M (1996) Fuzzy versus statistical linear regression. Eur J Oper Res 92(2):417–434

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Zhang Y, Liu W, Gao J (2012) The application of fuzzy regression based on the trapezoidal fuzzy numbers to the software quality evaluation. J Comput Inf Syst 7(19):293–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Chen Y, Zhou J, Yi X (2016) An exact expected value-based method to prioritize engineering characteristics in fuzzy quality function deployment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 18(4):630–646

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Chen Y (2013) A systematic approach to optimizing \(h\) value for fuzzy linear regression with symmetric triangular fuzzy numbers. Math Problems Eng, 2013: Article ID 210164

  • Liu Y, Chen Y, Zhou J, Zhong S (2015) Fuzzy linear regression models for QFD using optimized \(h\) values. Eng Appl Artif Intell 39:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zhou J, Chen Y (2014) Using fuzzy non-linear regression to identify the compensation level among customer requirements in QFD. Neurocomputing 142:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu M, Madu CN, Kuei C, Winokur D (1994) Integrating QFD, AHP and benchmarking in strategic marketing. J Bus Ind Mark 9(1):41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao Y, Liu Y, Chen Y, Zhou J, Ji P (2017) Two uncertain chance-constrained programming models to setting target levels of design attributes in quality function deployment. Inf Sci (accepted)

  • Moskowitz H, Kim KJ (1993) On assessing the \(H\) value in fuzzy linear regression. Fuzzy Sets Syst 58(3):303–327

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sener Z, Karsak EE (2011) A combined fuzzy linear regression and fuzzy multiple objective programming approach for setting target levels in quality function deployment. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):3015–3022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H, Uejima S, Asai K (1982) Linear regression analysis with fuzzy model. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 12(6):903–907

  • Vanegas LV, Labib AW (2001) A fuzzy quality function deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets. Int J Prod Res 39(1):99–120

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Wang L, Bao Y (2016) Technical attributes ratings in fuzzy QFD by integrating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and Choquet integral. Soft Comput. doi:10.1007/s00500-016-2464-8

  • Zheng LY, Chin KS (2005) QFD based optimal process quality planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(7–8):831–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong S, Zhou J, Chen Y (2014) Determination of target values of engineering characteristics in QFD using a fuzzy chance-constrained modelling approach. Neurocomputing 142:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the gracious support of this work by “Shuguang Program” from Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. 15SG36).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Y. Ni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Han, Y., Zhou, J. et al. Establishing the relationship matrix in QFD based on fuzzy regression models with optimized h values. Soft Comput 22, 5603–5615 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2533-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2533-7

Keywords

Navigation