Skip to main content
Log in

Completing 2-tuple linguistic preference relations based on upper bound condition

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose a method to estimate missing preference values when handling incomplete linguistic preference relations assessed by using 2-tuple linguistic preference values. We assert that additive transitivity alone may result in estimated values that do not qualify as 2-tuple linguistic preference values. Therefore, an upper bound condition based on additive transitivity is proposed to deal with incomplete 2-tuple linguistic preference relations (2TLPRs). We prove that if experts with incomplete information abide by this property, then the missing preference values can be estimated such that they are expressible. Additionally, because of this property, the resultant complete 2TLPR is proved to be consistent. Based on additive transitivity and the upper bound condition, an interactive completing algorithm is developed to estimate the missing entries in incomplete 2TLPR. When the upper bound condition is not satisfied or there exist entries that do not coincide with the real opinions of the experts, the proposed algorithm can automatically adjust the known entries by interacting with the experts. By using the proposed algorithm, the completed 2TLPR is not only additively consistent, but also can accurately reflect the actual preference of the experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alcala-Fdez J, Porcel C (2008) A consistency based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values. Int J Intell Syst 23:155–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso S, Cabrerizo F, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Int J Intell Syst 24:201–222

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso S, Perez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2013) A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities. Appl Soft Comput 13:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beg I, Rashid T (2016) Hesitant 2-tuple linguistic information in multiple attributes group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30(1):109–116

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrerizo FJ, Heradio R, Perez IJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2010a) A selection process based on additive consistency to deal with incomplete fuzzy linguistic information. J Univers Comput Sci 16:62–81

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrerizo F, Perez I, Herrera-Viedma E (2010b) Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information. Knowl Based Syst 23:169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Alonso S (2004) Induced ordered weighted geometric operators and their use in the aggregation of multiplicative preference relations. Int J Intell Syst 19:233–255

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chuu SJ (2011) Interactive group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a supply chain. Eur J Oper Re 213(1):279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordón O, Herrera F, Zwir I (2002) Linguistic modeling by hierarchical systems of linguistic rules. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(1):2–20

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic GDM with preference relation. IEEE Trans Cybern 45(4):780–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Xu YF, Yu S (2009) Computing the numerical scale of the linguistic term set for the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(6):1366–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Hong WC, Xu YF (2013) Measuring consistency of linguistic preference relations: a 2-tuple linguistic approach. Soft Comput 17:2117–2130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Li CC, Xu Y, Gu X (2015) Consensus-based group decision making under multi-granular unbalanced 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Group Decis Negot 24(2):217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Li CC, Herrera F (2016a) Connecting the linguistic hierarchy and the numerical scale for the 2-tuple linguistic model and its use to deal with hesitant unbalanced linguistic information. Inf Sci 367:259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Li CC, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2016b) Average-case consistency measurement and analysis of interval-valued reciprocal preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 114:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenbach DH, Moore CF (2000) Incomplete information, inferences, and individual differences: the case of environmental judgments. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 81:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8:746–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L (2001) A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B (Cybern) 31(2):227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1995) A sequential selection process in group decision making with a linguistic assessment approach. Inf Sci 85:223–239

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79:175–190

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F (2001) Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 129(2):372–385

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L, Sanchez P (2005) Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 166:115–132

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154:98–109

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13(5):644–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern (Part B) 37(1):176–189

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid A, Awais MM (2014a) Incomplete preference relations: an upper bound condition. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(3):1433–1438

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid A, Awais MM (2014b) Comparing ranking methods: complete RCI preference and multiplicative preference relations. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:849–861

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid A, Beg I (2016) Incomplete interval valued fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 348:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JK, Choi SH, Han CH (1998) An interactive procedure for multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete information. Comput Ind Eng 35(1–2):295–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CC, Dong YC, Herrera F et al (2017) Personalized individual semantics in computing with words for supporting linguistic group decision making. An application on consensus reaching. Inf Fusion 33:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Dong Y, Chiclana F, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Group decision-making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10700-016-9254-8

  • Millet I (1997) The effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation methods in the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 6:41–51

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Orlovsky S (1978) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:155–167

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119

  • Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Herrera F (2013) A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Inf Sci 241:28–42

  • Urena R, Chiclana F, Morente-Molinera JA, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Managing incomplete preference relations in decision making: a review and future trends. Inf Sci 302:14–32

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Xu ZS (2016) Interactive algorithms for improving incomplete linguistic preference relations based on consistency measures. Appl Soft Comput 42:66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context. Appl Soft Comput 35:827–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia MM, Xu ZS, Wang Z (2014) Multiplicative consistency-based decision support system for incomplete linguistic preference relations. Int J Syst Sci 45:625–636

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2004) On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 3:217–225

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2005) An approach to group decision making based on incomplete linguistic preference relations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 4:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2006) Incomplete linguistic preference relations and their fusion. Inf Fusion 7:331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2008) Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 178(2):452–467

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YJ, Ma F, Tao FF, Wang HM (2014) Some methods to deal with unacceptable incomplete 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 56:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1996) Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Guo CQ (2014) Consistency-based algorithms to estimate missing elements for uncertain 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Int J Comput Intell Syst 7:924–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their insightful and constructive comments and suggestions that have led to an improved version of this paper. The work of Shengbao Yao was supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 14YJA630086), Funds from China Scholarship Council (No. 201507085025) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 31541410811).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengbao Yao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, S., Khalid, A. Completing 2-tuple linguistic preference relations based on upper bound condition. Soft Comput 22, 6215–6227 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2762-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2762-9

Keywords