Skip to main content
Log in

Data-based multiple criteria decision-making model and visualized monitoring of urban drinking water quality

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to comprehensively evaluate and monitor urban drinking water quality to ensure a safe and clean drinking water supply. This paper discusses evaluating, analyzing and monitoring of urban drinking water quality and application systematically and proposes a multiple criteria decision-making model, which integrates analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Kullback–Leibler divergence ratio (KLDR) and comprehensive weighted index (CWI) method to evaluate the quality of drinking water comprehensively. AHP method and KLDR are employed to distribute reasonable weight to indices, and CWI method is used to get comprehensive score of multiple criteria system for evaluation. Association analysis is used to find the useful association rules between criteria and drinking water quality. Geographic information system (GIS) technology is employed to show the distribution map of drinking water quality visually. The proposed method is applied to real-time comprehensive evaluation and visualized monitoring of drinking water quality in Shanghai City. The distribution map of drinking water quality based on GIS can provide monitoring and government agencies with an overall assessment and enable them to make better informed decisions. Real-time application shows that the proposed methods are effective for the assessment and monitoring of urban water quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullah L, Najib L (2016) A new preference scale mcdm method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the analysis hierarchy process. Soft Comput 20(2):511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiri V, Rezaei M, Sohrabi N (2014) Groundwater quality assessment using entropy weighted water quality index (EWQI) in Lenjanat, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 72(9):3479–3490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1979) A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica 47(5):1287–1294

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Hao X (2011) An optimal combination weights method considering both subjective and objective weight information in power quality evaluation. In: Advanced electrical and electronics engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–105

  • Dabbagh M, Lee SP, Parizi RM (2016) Functional and non-functional requirements prioritization: empirical evaluation of IPA, AHP-based, and HAM-based approaches. Soft Comput 20(11):4497–4520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal SG, Shirodkar PV, Jagtap TG, Naik BG, Rao GS (2010) Evaluation of significant sources influencing the variation of water quality of Kandlacreek, Gulf of Katchchh, using PCA. Environ Monit Assess 163(1–4):49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan R, Zhong M, Wang S et al (2011) Entropy-based information gain approaches to detect and to characterize gene-gene and gene-environment interactions/correlations of complex diseases. Genet Epidemiol 35(7):706–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua LM, Madu CN, Kuei C, Winokur D (1994) Integrating QFD, AHP and benchmarking in strategic marketing. J Bus Ind Mark 9(1):41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipp J, Güntzer U, Nakhaeizadeh G (2000) Algorithms for association rule mining—a general survey and comparison. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 2(1):58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakumeit J, Herdy M, Nitsche M (2005) Parameter optimization of the sheet metal forming process using an iterative parallel Kriging algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 29(6):498–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaleie S, Fasanghari M (2012) An intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making method using entropy and association coefficient. Soft Comput 16(7):1197–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwong CK, Bai H (2002) A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. J Intell Manuf 13(5):367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin ZC, Yang CB (1996) Evaluation of machine selection by the AHP method. J Mater Process Technol 57(3–4):253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin MC, Wang CC, Chen MS, Chang CA (2008) Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Comput Ind 59(1):17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe CL, Rheingans RD (2006) Global challenges in water, sanitation and health. J Water Health 4(S1):41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Prati L, Pavanello R, Pesarin F (1971) Assessment of surface water quality by a single index of pollution. Water Res 5(9):741–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu LL, Kang R (2009) Expert evaluation method for equipment support scheme during development. Ordnance Ind Autom 6:008

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Mandal BK, Chowdhury TR et al (2003) Arsenic groundwater contamination and sufferings of people in North 24-Parganas, one of the nine arsenic affected districts of West Bengal, India. J Environ Sci Health Part A 38(1):25–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajeswari K, Nakil S, Patil N, Pereira S, Ramdasi N (2014) Text categorization optimization by a hybrid approach using multiple feature selection and feature extraction methods. J Eng Res Appl 4(5):86–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousta BA, Araghinejad S (2015) Development of a multi criteria decision making tool for a water resources decision support system. Water Resour Manage 29(15):5713–5727

  • Wan X, Hu N, Huo M (2014) Application of association rules data mining in the determination the operation target values in the thermal power plant. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer science and service system, 2014

  • Yadav SS, Kumar R (2011) Monitoring water quality of Kosi river in Rampur District, Uttar Pradesh. India. Adv Appl Sci Res 2(2):197–201

  • Yang Q, Ding Y, de Vries B, Han Q, Ma H (2014) Assessing regional sustainability using a model of coordinated development index: a case study of mainland China. Sustainability 6(12):9282–9304

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is sponsored by National Nature Science Foundation under Grant No. 60974119.

Funding    This study was funded by National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (60974119).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiwu Yan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Weiwu Yan has received research grants from NSFC. Jialong Li declares that he has no conflict of interest. Manhua Liu declares that he has no conflict of interest. Xiaohui Bai declares no conflict of interest. Huihe Shao declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by Y. Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, W., Li, J., Liu, M. et al. Data-based multiple criteria decision-making model and visualized monitoring of urban drinking water quality. Soft Comput 21, 6031–6041 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2809-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2809-y

Keywords

Navigation