Skip to main content
Log in

A class of belief structures based on possibility measures

  • Foundations
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After discussing the basics of belief structures we introduce a new class of belief structures in which we select from among the focal elements using a possibility measure. We refer to this as a maxitive belief structure, MBS. The concepts of belief and plausibility are defined for an MBS, and it is noted how an MBS can be used to model imprecise possibility distributions. We describe various operations with these structures including arithmetic and fusion. We look at the use of the Choquet integral type aggregation for these MBS. Measures other than belief and plausibility were defined for these structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beliakov G, Pradera A, Calvo T (2007) Aggregation functions: a guide for practitioners. Springer, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Caselton WF, Luo W (1992) Decision making with imprecise probabilities: Dempster–Shafer theory and application. Water Resour Res 28:3071–3083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choquet G (1953) Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier 5:131–295

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dammak F, Baccour L, Alimi A (2016) An exhaustive study of possibility measures of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to multicriteria decision making. Adv Fuzzy Syst 2016:9185706. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9185706

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP (1968) A generalization of Bayesian inference. J R Stat Soc 30:205–247

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP (1966) New methods of reasoning toward posterior distributions based on sample data. Ann Math Stat 37:355–374

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Ann Math Stat 38:325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP (2008) The Dempster–Shafer calculus for statisticians. Int J Approx Reason 48:365–377

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H, Rico A (2013) Qualitative capacities as imprecise possibilities. In: van der Gaag LC (ed) Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty. ECSQARU 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7958. Springer, Berlin, pp 169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Yang SL (2011) Analyzing the applicability of Dempster’s rule to the combination of interval-valued belief structures. Expert Syst Appl 38:4291–4301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klement EP, Mesiar R, Pap E (2010) A universal integral as common frame for Choquet and Sugeno. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 18:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ (2006) Uncertainty and information. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ, Wierman MJ (1999) Uncertainty based information. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Yager RR (2008) Classic works of the Dempster–Shafer theory of belief functions: an introduction. In: Yager RR, Liu L (eds) Classic works of the Dempster–Shafer theory of belief functions. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–34

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moore RE (1966) Interval analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan M (1990) Using maximum entropy-ordered weighted averaging to construct a fuzzy neuron. In: Proceedings 24th annual IEEE Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers, Pacific Grove, CA, pp 618–623

  • Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smets P (1988) Belief functions. In: Smets P, Mamdani EH, Dubois D, Prade H (eds) Non-standard logics for automated reasoning. Academic Press, London, pp 253–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets P (1992) The tranferable belief model and random sets. Int J Intell Syst 7:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets P, Kennes R (1994) The transferable belief model. Artif Intell 66:191–234

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sugeno M (1977) Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals: a survey. In: Gupta MM, Saridis GN, Gaines BR (eds) Fuzzy automata and decision process. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsiporkova E, De Baets B (1998) A general framework for upper and lower possibilities and necessities. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 6:1–34

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Klir GJ (2009) Generalized measure theory. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Liu L, (Dempster AP, Shafer G, Advisory Editors) (2008) Classic works of the Dempster–Shafer theory of belief functions. Springer, Heidelberg

  • Yager RR (1987) On the Dempster–Shafer framework and new combination rules. Inf Sci 41:93–137

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1996) Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Int J Intell Syst 11:49–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2017) Belief structures, weight generating functions and decision-making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 16:1–21

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1994) Advances in the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1979) Fuzzy sets and information granularity. In: Gupta MM, Ragade RK, Yager RR (eds) Advances in fuzzy set theory and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1979) On the validity of Dempster’s rule of combination of evidence, Memo# UCB/ERL, M79/32. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald R. Yager.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The author declare that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Di Nola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yager, R.R. A class of belief structures based on possibility measures. Soft Comput 22, 7909–7917 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3062-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3062-8

Keywords

Navigation