Skip to main content
Log in

Handling group decision-making model with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in medical decision

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On account of uncertainty and complexity of environments, it is more suitable to express their assessed value by means of hesitant fuzzy information for decision makers. In this paper, we establish a new group decision-making (GDM) model with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs) based on mathematical programming approach. Firstly, based on the multiplicative consistency of incomplete HFPR, a mathematical programming model is established to obtain multiplicative consistent fuzzy preference relation (FPR) from a given incomplete HFPR. Following this, experts are assigned with weights according to their consistency degree. Subsequently, a group consensus reaching process algorithm is constructed based on the obtained multiplicative consistent FPRs. Correspondingly, a GDM model is further established. Finally, a medical decision application is studied to present the practicability and effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anstey A, Edwards A (2014) Shared decision making in dermatology: asking patients’, What is important to you?’. Br J Dermatol 170:759–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154:98–109

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:644–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fusion 17:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1988) A “soft” measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 34:316–325

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li GX, Kou G, Lin CS, Xu L, Liao Y (2015a) Multi-attribute decision making with generalized fuzzy numbers. J Oper Res Soc 66(11):1793–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li GX, Kou G, Peng Y (2015b) Dynamic fuzzy multiple criteria decision making for performance evaluation. Technol Econ Dev Econ 21(5):705–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li GX, Kou G, Peng Y (2016) A group decision making model for integrating heterogeneous information. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2627050

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao HC, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2014) Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 13:47–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massanet S, Riera JV, Torrens J, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) A model based on subjective linguistic preference relations for group decision making problems. Inf Sci 355–356:249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:155–167

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) A new consensus model for group decision making problems with nonhomogeneous experts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 22:494–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RM, Martíneza L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RM, Martíneza L, Herrera F (2013) A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Inf Sci 241:28–42

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RM, Bedregal B, Bustince H, Dong YC, Farhadinia B, Kahraman C, Martínez L, Torra V, Xu YJ, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2016) A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making. Towards high quality progress. Inf Fusion 29:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song YM, Hu J (2017) A group decision-making model based on incomplete comparative expressions with hesitant linguistic terms. Appl Soft Comput 59:174–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Set Syst 12:117–131

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ureña R, Chiclana F, Morente-Molinera JA, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Managing incomplete preference relations in decision making: a review and future trends. Inf Sci 302:14–32

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xia MM, Xu ZS (2013) Managing hesitant information in GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 21:865–897

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2005) Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YJ, Wang HM (2013) Eigenvector method, consistency test and inconsistency repairing for an incomplete fuzzy preference relation. Appl Math Model 37:5171–5183

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YJ, Wang HM (2017) A group consensus decision support model for hesitant 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic preference relations with additive consistency. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33(1):41–54

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YJ, Patnayakuni R, Wang HM (2013a) Logarithmic least squares method to priority for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. Appl Math Model 37:2139–2152

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YJ, Li KW, Wang HM (2013b) Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Inf Sci 253:56–73

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XH, Du ZJ, Chen XH (2015a) Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions. Decis Support Syst 79:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XH, Zhong XY, Chen XH, Zhou YJ (2015b) A dynamical consensus method based on exit-delegation mechanism for large group emergency decision making. Knowl Based Syst 86:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YJ, Chen L, Rodríguez RM, Herrera F, Wang HM (2016) Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 99:71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) A consensus model for hesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in water allocation management. Appl Soft Comput 58:265–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YJ, Li CY, Wen XW (2018) Missing values estimation and consensus building for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations with multiplicative consistency. Int J Comput Intell Syst 11:101–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Guo CH (2016a) Fusion of heterogeneous incomplete hesitant preference relations in group decision making. Int J Comput Intell Syst 9(2):245–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Guo CH (2016b) Consistency and consensus models for group decision-making with uncertain 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Int J Syst Sci 47(11):2572–2587

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZM, Wang C, Tian X (2015a) Multi-criteria group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 36:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZM, Wu C, Tian XD (2015b) A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 86:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu B, Xu ZS (2013) Regression methods for hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Technol Econ Dev Econ 19:214–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu B, Xu ZS, Xu JP (2014) Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision making. IEEE Trans Cybern 44:1328–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#71601032), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZYGX2015KYQD079).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangxu Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Y., Li, G. Handling group decision-making model with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in medical decision. Soft Comput 23, 6657–6666 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3316-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3316-5

Keywords

Navigation