Abstract
In this paper, we apply logical methods to risk analysis. We study generalized events, i.e. not yes-no events but continuous ones. We define on this class of events a risk function and a measure over it to analyse risk in this context. We use Riesz MV-algebras as algebraic structures and their associated logic in support of our research, thanks to their relations with other applications. Moreover, we investigate on decidability of consequence problem for our class of risk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abad P, Benito S, López C (2014) A comprehensive review of value at risk methodologies. Span Rev Financ Econ 12(1):15–32
Angelini E, di Tollo G, Roli A (2008) A neural network approach for credit risk evaluation. Q Rev Econ Financ 48(4):733–755
Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Financ 9(3):203–228
Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D, Ku H (2007) Coherent multiperiod risk adjusted values and Bellman’s principle. Ann Oper Res 152(1):5–22
Atiya AF (2001) Bankruptcy prediction for credit risk using neural networks: a survey and new results. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 12(4):929–935
Baesens B, Setiono R, Mues C, Vanthienen J (2003) Using neural network rule extraction and decision tables for credit-risk evaluation. Manag Sci 49(3):312–329
Bernard C, Rüschendorf L, Vanduffel S (2017) Value-at-risk bounds with variance constraints. J Risk Insur 84(3):923–959
Bernstein PL (1996) Against the gods: the remarkable story of risk. Wiley, New York
Bühlmann H (2007) Mathematical methods in risk theory, vol 172. Springer, Berlin
Cerreia-Vioglio S, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Montrucchio L (2011) Risk measures: rationality and diversification. Math Financ 21(4):743–774
Cerreia-Vioglio S, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Rustichini A (2014) Niveloids and their extensions: risk measures on small domains. J Math Anal Appl 413(1):343–360
Cignoli RL, d’Ottaviano IM, Mundici D (2013) Algebraic foundations of many-valued reasoning, vol 7. Springer, Berlin
Di Nola A (1993) Mv algebras in the treatment of uncertainty. Logic fuzzy. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–131
Di Nola A, Gerla B, Leustean I (2013) Adding real coefficients to łukasiewicz logic: an application to neural networks. Fuzzy logic and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–85
Di Nola A, Lenzi G, Vitale G (2016) Łukasiewicz equivalent neural networks. Advances in neural networks. Springer, Berlin, pp 161–168
Di Nola A, Lenzi G, Vitale G (2017) On mv-algebras of non-linear functions. Categ General Algebr Struct Appl 6:107–120
Di Nola A, Lenzi G, Vitale G (2017) Riesz-mcnaughton functions and riesz mv-algebras of nonlinear functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 311:1–14
Di Nola A, Leustean I (2011) Riesz mv-algebras and their logic. In: Proceedings of the 7th conference of the European society for fuzzy logic and technology, Atlantis Press, pp 140–145
Di Nola A, Leuştean I (2014) Łukasiewicz logic and riesz spaces. Soft Comput 18(12):2349–2363
Di Nola A, Vitale G (2018) Łukasiewicz logic and artificial neural networks. Beyond traditional probabilistic data processing techniques: interval, fuzzy, etc. Methods and their applications. Springer, Berlin
Gerber HU (1979) An introduction to mathematical risk theory. 517/G36i
Grandell J (2012) Aspects of risk theory. Springer, Berlin
Kahneman D, Tversky A (2013) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: part I. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 99–127
Kang Y, Batta R, Kwon C (2014) Value-at-risk model for hazardous material transportation. Ann Oper Res 222(1):361–387
Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6):1849–1892
Lapuerta P, Azen SP, LaBree L (1995) Use of neural networks in predicting the risk of coronary artery disease. Comput Biomed Res 28(1):38–52
Liu Y, Ralescu DA (2017) Value-at-risk in uncertain random risk analysis. Inf Sci 391:1–8
Mundici D (2011) Advanced Łukasiewicz calculus and MV-algebras. Springer, Netherlands
Petturiti D, Vantaggi B (2019) Conditional submodular choquet expected values and conditional coherent risk measures. Int J Approx Reason 44:358–365
Soleimani H, Govindan K (2014) Reverse logistics network design and planning utilizing conditional value at risk. Eur J Oper Res 237(2):487–497
Trippi RR, Turban E (1992) Neural networks in finance and investing: using artificial intelligence to improve real world performance. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York
Tulli V, Weinrich G (2015) Using value-at-risk to reconcile limited liability and the moral-hazard problem. Decis Econ Financ 38(1):93–118
Vicig P (2008) Financial risk measurement with imprecise probabilities. Int J Approxim Reason 49(1):159–174
West D (2000) Neural network credit scoring models. Comput Oper Res 27(11–12):1131–1152
Wipplinger E (2007) Philippe jorion: value at risk-the new benchmark for managing financial risk. Financ Mark Portf Manag 21(3):397
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by M. Squillante.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vitale, G. Risk analysis via Łukasiewicz logic. Soft Comput 24, 13651–13655 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04440-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04440-2