Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of fundraising outcomes for crowdfunding projects based on deep learning: a multimodel comparative study

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a new financing model, crowdfunding has been developed rapidly in recent years and has attracted the attention of investors and small- and medium-sized enterprises and entrepreneurs. However, many projects fail to be funded; thus, crowdfunding project fundraising outcomes forecasting and multimodel comparisons are meaningful ways to identify project quality and reduce market risk. It is important to reduce participation risk through automated methods, which is of great significance to the sustainable development of Internet finance. First, based on the data from the Kickstarter, preprocessing and exploratory analysis are conducted. Then, we introduce a deep learning algorithm (multilayer perceptron) and apply it to the prediction of crowdfunding financing performance. We compare deep learning with other commonly used machine learning algorithms, including decision tree, random forest, logistic regression, support vector machine, and K-nearest neighbors algorithm. We tune each machine learning algorithm to get the best parameters. The experimental results show that the deep learning model can obtain the best prediction results, with an accuracy of 92.3% when predicting the fundraising outcomes of crowdfunding financing, followed by the decision tree. Deep learning shows significant advantages in many evaluation criteria, which demonstrates the potential for crowdfunding project financing predictions. This study combines machine learning with Internet finance, providing inspiration for future research and resulting in many practical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An J, Quercia D, Crowcroft J (2014) Recommending investors for crowdfunding projects. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web, 2014. ACM, pp 261–270

  • Bach FR (2014) Adaptivity of averaged stochastic gradient descent to local strong convexity for logistic regression. J Mach Learn Res 15:595–627

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Biljohn MIM, Lues L (2019) Social innovation and service delivery in Belgium and South Africa. Transf Gov People Process Policy 13:143–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3:993–1022

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brent DA, Lorah K (2019) The economic geography of civic crowdfunding. Cities 90:122–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Briceno CEB, Santos FCA (2019) Knowledge management, the missing piece in the 2030 agenda and SDGs puzzle. Int J Sustain High Educ 20:901–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown I, Mues C (2012) An experimental comparison of classification algorithms for imbalanced credit scoring data sets. Expert Syst Appl 39:3446–3453

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll HD, Kann MG, Sheetlin SL, Spouge JL (2010) Threshold average precision (TAP-k): a measure of retrieval designed for bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 26:1708–1713

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney D (2019) A principal–agent perspective on consumer co-production: crowdfunding and the redefinition of consumer power. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 141:74–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Wang H, Ma Y, Zheng X, Guo L (2020) Self-adaptive resource allocation for cloud-based software services based on iterative QoS prediction model. Future Gener Comput Syst 105:287–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinnaswamy A, Papa A, Dezi L, Mattiacci A (2019) Big data visualisation, geographic information systems and decision making in healthcare management. Manag Decis 57:1937–1959

    Google Scholar 

  • Denoeux T (2019) Logistic regression, neural networks and dempster-shafer theory: a new perspective. Knowl-Based Syst 176:54–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Etter V, Grossglauser M, Thiran P (2013) Launch hard or go home! Predicting the success of Kickstarter campaigns. In: Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Online Social Networks (COSN’13), vol CONF. ACM, pp 177–182

  • Gafni H, Marom D, Sade O (2019) Are the life and death of an early-stage venture indeed in the power of the tongue? Lessons from online crowdfunding pitches. Strateg Entrepreneurship J 13:3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong X-L, Liu X-H, Xiong X, Zhuang X-T (2019) Forecasting stock volatility process using improved least square support vector machine approach. Soft Comput 23:11867–11881

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg MD, Pardo B, Hariharan K, Gerber E (2013) Crowdfunding support tools: predicting success & failure. In: CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 1815–1820

  • Kaminski JC, Hopp C (2019) Predicting outcomes in crowdfunding campaigns with textual, visual, and linguistic signals. Small Bus Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00218-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski J, Hopp C, Tykvová T (2019) New technology assessment in entrepreneurial financing-does crowdfunding predict venture capital investments? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 139:287–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Richter C, Brem A, Cheng C-F, Chang M-L (2016) Strategies for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. J Innov Knowl 1:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kromidha E, Robson P (2016) Social identity and signalling success factors in online crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 28:605–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurell C, Sandström C, Suseno Y (2019) Assessing the interplay between crowdfunding and sustainability in social media. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 141:117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Yang B, Yan L, Gao W (2020) Energy-aware resource management for uplink non-orthogonal multiple access: multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. Future Gener Comput Syst 105:684–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Long W, Lu Z, Cui L (2019) Deep learning-based feature engineering for stock price movement prediction. Knowl-Based Syst 164:163–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantas CJ, Castellano JG, Moral-García S, Abellán J (2019) A comparison of random forest based algorithms: random credal random forest versus oblique random forest. Soft Comput 23:10739–10754

    Google Scholar 

  • Miglo A, Miglo V (2019) Market imperfections and crowdfunding. Small Bus Econ 53:51–79

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur 29:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareek B, Liu Q, Ghosh P (2019) Ask your doctor if this product is right for you: a bayesian joint model for patient drug requests and physician prescriptions. J R Stat Soc Ser A Forthcom 182:197–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Parhankangas A, Renko M (2017) Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 32:215–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi L, RaviChandran N, Manaog ML (2018) Decision support system to improve postoperative discharge: a novel multi-class classification approach. Knowl-Based Syst 152:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey-García M, Calvo N, Mato-Santiso V (2019) Collective social enterprises for social innovation. Manag Decis 57:1415–1440

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokach L (2016) Decision forest: twenty years of research. Inf Fusion 27:111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Saqlain SM, Sher M, Shah FA, Khan I, Ashraf MU, Awais M, Ghani A (2019) Fisher score and Matthews correlation coefficient-based feature subset selection for heart disease diagnosis using support vector machines. Knowl Inf Syst 58:139–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Saumya S, Singh JP, Dwivedi YK (2019) Predicting the helpfulness score of online reviews using convolutional neural network. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03851-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons A, Kaiser LF, vom Brocke J (2019) Enterprise crowdfunding: foundations, applications, and research findings. Bus Inf Syst Eng 61:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa S, Nielsen KR, Bogers M, Cincotti S (2019) The role of crowdfunding in moving towards a sustainable society. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 141:66–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulo KLM, Hidayanto AN, Sandhyaduhita PI, Fitriani WR, Abidin Z (2019) Factors influencing internet users’ intention to sign e-petitions. Transform Gov People Process Policy 13:257–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Vismara S (2019) Sustainability in equity crowdfunding. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 141:98–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahbeh AH, Al-Radaideh QA, Al-Kabi MN, Al-Shawakfa EM (2011) A comparison study between data mining tools over some classification methods. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 8:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Tan G, Wang H (2017a) Cross-domain comparison of algorithm performance in extracting aspect-based opinions from Chinese online reviews. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 8:1053–1070

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Zhu K, Wang H, Wu Y-CJ (2017b) The impact of sentiment orientations on successful crowdfunding campaigns through text analytics. IET Softw 11:229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Jin F, Cheng Y (2019a) Early predictions for medical crowdfunding: a deep learning approach using diverse inputs. arXiv:191105702

  • Wang W, Shen J, Xie J, Cheng M-M, Ling H, Borji A (2019b) Revisiting video saliency prediction in the deep learning era. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2924417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong T-T, Yang N-Y (2017) Dependency analysis of accuracy estimates in k-fold cross validation. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 29:2417–2427

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu YJ, Chen S-C, Pan C-I (2019) Entrepreneurship in the internet age: internet, entrepreneurs, and capital resources. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst (IJSWIS) 15:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue J, Wu K, Zhou Y (2019) A risk analysis and prediction model of electric power GIS based on deep learning. Int J Comput Sci Eng 18:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao L, Ge Z (2019) Distributed parallel deep learning of hierarchical extreme learning machine for multimode quality prediction with big process data. Eng Appl Artif Intell 81:450–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao H, Zhang Y (2014) Research on influence factors of crowdfunding. Int Bus Manag 9:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan H, Lau RY, Xu W (2016) The determinants of crowdfunding success: a semantic text analytics approach. Decis Support Syst 91:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Jin B, Liu Q, Ge Y, Chen E, Zhang X, Xu T (2019) Voice of charity: prospecting the donation recurrence & donor retention in crowdfunding. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 14:1–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by the NSFC Grant (71601082), Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2017J01132), Huaqiao University’s High Level Talent Research Start Project Funding (16SKBS102) and Teaching development reform project for Huaqiao University teachers (17JF-JXGZ17) and Ministry of Science & Technology, Taiwan (MOST 108-2511-H-003 -034 –MY2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yenchun Jim Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by Mu-Yen Chen.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Zheng, H. & Wu, Y.J. Prediction of fundraising outcomes for crowdfunding projects based on deep learning: a multimodel comparative study. Soft Comput 24, 8323–8341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04822-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04822-x

Keywords

Navigation