Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An improved version of salp swarm algorithm for solving optimal power flow problem

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Salp swarm algorithm (SSA) is a recent optimization technique inspired by behavior of the salp chains in deep oceans. However, the SSA is efficient, simple and easy to implement, it is susceptible to stagnation at local optima for some cases. The main contribution of this paper is proposing an improved salp swarm algorithm algorithm (ISSA) for enhancing the search capabilities of the original SSA to solve the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. In the proposed ISSA, both of exploration and the exploitation processes are enhanced. The exploration process is achieved by applying a random mutation to find new searching areas while an adaptive process is developed to enhance the exploitation process by focusing on the most promising search area. This strategy will balance the transformation between exploration and exploitation. The ISSA is employed to achieve OPF with non-smooth and non-convex generator fuel cost functions such as; minimizing quadratic fuel cost, piecewise quadratic cost, quadratic fuel cost considering the valve-point effect and prohibited zones. The main advantages of the ISSA are avoiding stagnation at local optima and can solve nonlinear and non-smooth optimization problems where its adaptive operators balance between the exploration and exploitation phases of this algorithm. However, the parameters of ISSA need to be carefully defined before application of algorithm. The proposed algorithm is validated using the standard IEEE 30-bus, IEEE 57-bus and IEEE 118-bus test systems. The performance of proposed algorithm is comprehensively compared with moth-flame optimization algorithm, improved harmony search algorithm, genetic algorithm and other reported optimization techniques. The results prove the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed algorithm compared with other optimization techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\( x_{j}^{1} \) :

The position of the leader in the jth dimension

\( x_{j}^{i} \) :

The position of ith follower salp in jth dimension

\( F_{j} \) :

The position of the food source in the jth dimension

\( L_{j} ,U_{j} \) :

The lower and upper bound of jth dimension

C 2, C 3, C 4 :

Random numbers in the interval of [0,1]

C 1 :

Time varying coefficient

t :

The current iteration

\( T_{\hbox{max} } \) :

The maximum number of iterations

\( v_{\text{final}} \) :

The final speed

v 0 :

The initial speed

\( V_{\text{L}} \) :

The voltage of load bus

\( Q_{\text{G}} \) :

The reactive power output of generators

\( S_{\text{TL}} \) :

The apparent power flow in transmission line

NPQ:

Number of load buses

NPV:

Number of generators PV buses

NTL:

Number of transmission lines

\( \lambda_{p} ,\lambda_{v} ,\lambda_{Q} ,\lambda_{s} \) :

Penalty factors

\( \delta_{j} , \delta_{i} \) :

Voltage angles bus i and j

A :

Time varying parameter

\( V_{i}^{\hbox{min} } ,V_{i}^{\hbox{max} } \) :

The minimum and the maximum voltage limits of load bus, respectively

\( T_{i}^{\hbox{min} } ,T_{i}^{\hbox{max} } \) :

The minimum and the maximum limits tap setting of transformers, respectively

\( P_{\text{Gi}}^{\hbox{min} } ,P_{\text{Gi}}^{\hbox{max} } \) :

The minimum and the maximum generated active limits ith generator, respectively

\( S_{{{\text{TL}},i}}^{\hbox{max} } \) :

The maximum apparent power flow limit of line i

x 0 :

The initial position of salp

E :

Time varying coefficient

F :

The objective function

x :

The state variables vector

u :

The control variables vector

\( g_{i} , h_{j} \) :

The equality and inequality constraints,

m, n :

Number of equality and inequality constraints

POZs:

Prohibited operating zones

\( P_{G1} \) :

The generated power of slack bus

\( P_{\text{G}} \) :

The output active power of generator

\( V_{\text{G}} \) :

The voltage of generating bus

\( Q_{\text{C}} \) :

The injected reactive power of shunt compensator

T :

Tap setting of transformer

NG:

Number of generators

NC:

Number of shunt compensator

NT:

Number of transformers

\( X_{j}^{\text{new}} \) :

The new position of the salp swarm

a i, b i, c i :

The cost coefficients of ith generator

d i, e i :

The fuel cost coefficients of the ith generator unit with valve-point effects

P D, Q D :

Active and reactive load demand

G, B :

Conductance, substance of transmission line

\( Q_{\text{ci}}^{\hbox{min} } ,Q_{\text{ci}}^{\hbox{max} } \) :

The minimum and the maximum limits of compensator reactive power, respectively

\( A_{\hbox{max} } ,A_{\hbox{min} } \) :

The minimum and the maximum A limit of the parameter, respectively

\( Q_{\text{Gi}}^{\hbox{min} } ,Q_{\text{Gi}}^{\hbox{max} } \) :

The minimum and the maximum generated reactive limits ith generator, respectively

\( K_{\hbox{min} } ,K_{\hbox{max} } \) :

The minimum and the maximum K limiter respectively

a :

The slap’s acceleration

References

  • Abbassi R, Abbassi A, Heidari AA, Mirjalili S (2019) An efficient salp swarm-inspired algorithm for parameters identification of photovoltaic cell models. Energy Convers Manag 179:362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdo M, Kamel S, Ebeed M, Yu J, Jurado F (2018) Solving non-smooth optimal power flow problems using a developed grey wolf optimizer. Energies 11(7):1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abido MA (2002a) Optimal power flow using tabu search algorithm. Electric Power Comp Syst 30(5):469–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abido MA (2002b) Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization. Int J Electric Power Energy Syst 24(7):563–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abou El Ela AA, Abido MA, Spea SR (2010) Optimal power flow using differential evolution algorithm. Electric Power Syst Res 80(7):878–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adaryani MR, Karami A (2013) Artificial bee colony algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem. Int J Electric Power Energy Syst 53:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhejji A, Hussein ME, Kamel S, Alyami S (2020) Optimal power flow solution with an embedded center-node unified power flow controller using an adaptive grasshopper optimization algorithm. IEEE Access 8:119020–119037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Muhawesh TA, Qamber IS (2008) The established mega watt linear programming-based optimal power flow model applied to the real power 56-bus system in eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Energy 33(1):12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anter AM, Ali M (2020) Feature selection strategy based on hybrid crow search optimization algorithm integrated with chaos theory and fuzzy c-means algorithm for medical diagnosis problems. Soft Comput 24(3):1565–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barik AK, Das DC (2018) Active power management of isolated renewable microgrid generating power from rooftop solar arrays, sewage waters and solid urban wastes of a smart city using salp swarm algorithm. In: Technologies for smart-city energy security and power (ICSESP). IEEE, pp 1–6

  • Baygi SMH, Karsaz A, Elahi A (2018) A hybrid optimal PID-fuzzy control design for seismic exited structural system against earthquake: a salp swarm algorithm. In: 6th Iranian joint congress on fuzzy and intelligent systems (CFIS). IEEE, pp 220–225

  • Bhattacharya A, Chattopadhyay PK (2011) Application of biogeography-based optimisation to solve different optimal power flow problems. IET Gen Transmission Distrib 5(1):70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchekara HREH (2014) Optimal power flow using black-hole-based optimization approach. Appl Soft Comput 24:879–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchekara HREH, Abido MA (2014) Optimal power flow using differential search algorithm. Electric Power Comp Syst 42(15):1683–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchett RC, Happ HH, Vierath DR (1984) Quadratically convergent optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Apparat Syst 11:3267–3275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung TS, Li YZ (2001) A hybrid GA approach for OPF with consideration of FACTS devices. IEEE power Eng Rev 21(2):47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Falco I, Della Cioppa A, Tarantino E (2002) Mutation-based genetic algorithm: performance evaluation. Appl Soft Comput 1(4):285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dommel HW, Tinney WF (1968) Optimal power flow solutions. IEEE Trans Power Apparat Syst 10:1866–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman S (2017) Symbiotic organisms search algorithm for optimal power flow problem based on valve-point effect and prohibited zones. Neural Comput Appl 28(11):3571–3585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman S, Güvenç U, Sönmez Y, Yörükeren N (2012) Optimal power flow using gravitational search algorithm. Energy Convers Manag 59:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekinci S, Hekimoglu B (2018) Parameter optimization of power system stabilizer via salp swarm algorithm. In: 5th International conference on electrical and electronic engineering (ICEEE). IEEE, pp 143–147

  • El Sehiemy RA, Selim F, Bentouati B, Abido MA (2020) A novel multi-objective hybrid particle swarm and salp optimization algorithm for technical-economical-environmental operation in power systems. Energy 193:116817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Fergany AA (2017) Electrical characterisation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells stack using grasshopper optimiser. IET Renew Power Gen 12(1):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Fergany AA, Hasanien HM (2019) Salp swarm optimizer to solve optimal power flow comprising voltage stability analysis. Neural Comput Appl 32(9):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Epitropakis MG, Tasoulis DK, Pavlidis NG, Plagianakos VP, Vrahatis MN (2011) Enhancing differential evolution utilizing proximity-based mutation operators. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 15(1):99–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan L, Chen H, Gao Y (2019) An improved flower pollination algorithm to the urban transit routing problem. Soft Comput 24(7):5043–5052

  • Faris H, Mafarja MM, Heidari AA, Aljarah I, Ala’M AZ, Mirjalili S, Fujita H (2018) An efficient binary salp swarm algorithm with crossover scheme for feature selection problems. Knowl Based Syst 154:43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faris H, Ala’M AZ, Heidari AA, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Hassonah MA, Fujita H (2019) An intelligent system for spam detection and identification of the most relevant features based on evolutionary random weight networks. Inf Fusion 48:67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faris H, Mirjalili S, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Heidari AA (2020) Salp swarm algorithm: theory, literature review, and application in extreme learning machines. In: Mirjalili S, Song Dong J, Lewis A (eds) Nature-inspired optimizers, vol 811. Springer, pp 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12127-3_11

  • Ghasemi M, Ghavidel S, Gitizadeh M, Akbari E (2015) An improved teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm using Lévy mutation strategy for non-smooth optimal power flow. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 65:375–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Holland JH (1988) Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Machine Learn 3:95–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022602019183

  • Habibollahzadeh H, Luo GX, Semlyen A (1989) Hydrothermal optimal power flow based on a combined linear and nonlinear programming methodology. IEEE Trans Power Syst 4(2):530–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegazy AE, Makhlouf MA, El-Tawel GS (2020) Improved salp swarm algorithm for feature selection. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci 32(3):335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hussien AG, Hassanien AE, Houssein EH (2017) Swarming behaviour of salps algorithm for predicting chemical compound activities. In: Eighth international conference on intelligent computing and information systems (ICICIS). IEEE, pp 315–320

  • Ibrahim A, Ahmed A, Hussein S, Hassanien AE (2018) Fish image segmentation using salp swarm algorithm. In: International conference on advanced machine learning technologies and applications. Springer, pp 42–51

  • Ibrahim RA, Ewees AA, Oliva D, Abd Elaziz M, Lu S (2019) Improved salp swarm algorithm based on particle swarm optimization for feature selection. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 10(8):3155–3169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MZ et al (2020) A Harris Hawks optimization based single-and multi-objective optimal power flow considering environmental emission. Sustainability 12(13):5248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jadhav HT, Bamane PD (2016) Temperature dependent optimal power flow using g-best guided artificial bee colony algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 77:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayabarathi T, Sadasivam G, Ramachandran V (1999) Evolutionary programming based economic dispatch of generators with prohibited operating zones. Electric Power Syst Res 52(3):261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayakumar N, Subramanian S, Ganesan S, Elanchezhian EB (2016) Grey wolf optimization for combined heat and power dispatch with cogeneration systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 74:252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur M, Narang N (2020) An integrated optimization technique for optimal power flow solution. Soft Comput 24:10865–10882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04590-3

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (2010) Particle swarm optimization. Encycl Mach Learn 4:760–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Kılıç U (2015) Backtracking search algorithm-based optimal power flow with valve point effect and prohibited zones. Electric Eng 97(2):101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar AR, Premalatha L (2015) Optimal power flow for a deregulated power system using adaptive real coded biogeography-based optimization. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 73:393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Cao Y, Dai LV, Yang X, Nguyen TT (2019) Optimal power flow for transmission power networks using a novel metaheuristic algorithm. Energies 12(22):4310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Gong W, Wang L, Yan X, Hu C (2020) Optimal power flow by means of improved adaptive differential evolution. Energy 198:117314

  • Mafarja M, Aljarah I, Heidari AA, Faris H, Fournier-Viger P, Li X, Mirjalili S (2018a) Binary dragonfly optimization for feature selection using time-varying transfer functions. Knowl Based Syst 161:185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mafarja M, Aljarah I, Heidari AA, Hammouri AI, Faris H, Ala’M AZ, Mirjalili S (2018b) Evolutionary population dynamics and grasshopper optimization approaches for feature selection problems. Knowl Based Syst 145:25–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdad B (2019) Improvement optimal power flow solution under loading margin stability using new partitioning whale algorithm. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 14(1):64–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavi M, Fesanghary M, Damangir E (2007) An improved harmony search algorithm for solving optimization problems. Appl Math Comput 188(2):1567–1579

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Manoranjitham GE, Shunmugalatha A (2015) RETRACTED: application of firefly algorithm on optimal power flow control incorporating simplified impedance UPFC model. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S (2015) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl Based Syst 89:228–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM (2017) Salp swarm algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed A-AA, Mohamed YS, El-Gaafary AA, Hemeida AM (2017) Optimal power flow using moth swarm algorithm. Electric Power Syst Res 142:190–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mota-Palomino R, Quintana VH (1986) Sparse reactive power scheduling by a penalty function-linear programming technique. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1(3):31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niknam T, Narimani MR, Azizipanah-Abarghooee R (2012) A new hybrid algorithm for optimal power flow considering prohibited zones and valve point effect. Energy Convers Manag 58:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ongsakul W, Tantimaporn T (2006) Optimal power flow by improved evolutionary programming. Electric power Comp Syst 34(1):79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman MS, Abo-Sinna MA, Mousa AA (2004) A solution to the optimal power flow using genetic algorithm. Appl Math Comput 155(2):391–405

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pulluri H, Naresh R, Sharma V (2018) A solution network based on stud krill herd algorithm for optimal power flow problems. Soft Comput 22(1):159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qais MH, Hasanien HM, Alghuwainem S (2019) Enhanced salp swarm algorithm: application to variable speed wind generators. Eng Appl Artif Intell 80:82–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao RV, Saroj A (2019) An elitism-based self-adaptive multi-population Jaya algorithm and its applications. Soft Comput 23(12):4383–4406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy SS (2019) Optimal power flow using hybrid differential evolution and harmony search algorithm. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(5):1077–1091

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Roy PK, Paul C (2015) Optimal power flow using krill herd algorithm. Int Trans Electric Energy Syst 25(8):1397–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos AJ, Da Costa GRM (1995) Optimal-power-flow solution by Newton’s method applied to an augmented Lagrangian function. IEE Proc Gen Transmission and Distrib 142(1):33–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savsani VJ, Tejani GG, Patel VK, Savsani P (2017) Modified meta-heuristics using random mutation for truss topology optimization with static and dynamic constraints. J Comput Des Eng 4(2):106–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayah S, Zehar K (2008) Modified differential evolution algorithm for optimal power flow with non-smooth cost functions. Energy Convers Manag 49(11):3036–3042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayed GI, Khoriba G, Haggag MH (2018) A novel chaotic salp swarm algorithm for global optimization and feature selection. Appl Intell 48(10):3462–3481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvakumar AI, Thanushkodi K (2007) A new particle swarm optimization solution to nonconvex economic dispatch problems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(1):42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen AM, El-Sehiemy RA, Farrag SM (2016) Solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem via forced initialised differential evolution algorithm. IET Gen Transmission Distrib 10(7):1634–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen MA, Mekhamer SF, Hasanien HM, Talaat HE (2019) Optimal power flow of power systems using hybrid firefly and particle swarm optimization technique. In 2019 21st international middle east power systems conference (MEPCON). IEEE, pp 232–237

  • Shilaja C, Arunprasath T (2019) Optimal power flow using moth swarm algorithm with gravitational search algorithm considering wind power. Future Gen Comput Syst 98:708–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun DI, Ashley B, Brewer B, Hughes A, Tinney WF (1984) Optimal power flow by Newton approach. IEEE Trans Power Apparat Syst 10:2864–2880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taher MA, Kamel S, Jurado F, Ebeed M (2019) Modified grasshopper optimization framework for optimal power flow solution. Electric Eng 101(1):121–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolba M, Rezk H, Diab AAZ, Al-Dhaifallah M (2018) A novel robust methodology based salp swarm algorithm for allocation and capacity of renewable distributed generators on distribution grids. Energies 11(10):2556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaisakh K, Srinivas LR (2011) Evolving ant direction differential evolution for OPF with non-smooth cost functions. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(3):426–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters DC, Sheble GB (1993) Genetic algorithm solution of economic dispatch with valve point loading. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(3):1325–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Zou F, Hei X, Yang D, Chen D, Jiang Q (2014) An improved teaching–learning-based optimization with neighborhood search for applications of ANN. Neurocomputing 143:231–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Yang M, Han X (2020) Optimal power flow considering transient thermal behavior of overhead transmission lines. Int J Electric Power Energy Syst 114:105396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing H, Song F, Yan L, Pan W (2019) A modified artificial bee colony algorithm for load balancing in network-coding-based multicast. Soft Comput 23(15):6287–6305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The IEEE power Systems test cases. Available: https://labs.ece.uw.edu/pstca/

  • Yan X, Quintana VH (1999) Improving an interior-point-based OPF by dynamic adjustments of step sizes and tolerances. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(2):709–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS (2012) Flower pollination algorithm for global optimization. In: International conference on unconventional computing and natural computation. Springer, pp 240–249

  • Yi W, Gao L, Li X, Zhou Y (2015) A new differential evolution algorithm with a hybrid mutation operator and self-adapting control parameters for global optimization problems. Appl Intell 42(4):642–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younes M, Khodja F, Kherfane RL (2014) Multi-objective economic emission dispatch solution using hybrid FFA (firefly algorithm) and considering wind power penetration. Energy 67:595–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Yuen SY (2015) A directional mutation operator for differential evolution algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 30:529–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Cui G, Wu J, Pan WT, He Q (2016) A novel multi-scale cooperative mutation fruit fly optimization algorithm. Knowl Based Syst 114:24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Wang Z, Luo X (2018) Parameter estimation for soil water retention curve using the salp swarm algorithm. Water 10(6):815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Mao L, Guan C, Zhu L, Wang Y (2020) An improved scatter search algorithm for the corridor allocation problem considering corridor width. Soft Comput 24(1):461–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sánchez CE, Thomas RJ (2010) MATPOWER: steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26(1):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the support of the National Research and Development Agency of Chile (ANID), ANID/Fondap/15110019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan, 81542, Egypt

    Salma Abd el-sattar & Salah Kamel

  2. Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt

    Mohamed Ebeed

  3. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Jaén, 23700 EPS Linares, Jaén, Spain

    Francisco Jurado

Authors
  1. Salma Abd el-sattar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Salah Kamel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed Ebeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francisco Jurado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Jurado.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abd el-sattar, S., Kamel, S., Ebeed, M. et al. An improved version of salp swarm algorithm for solving optimal power flow problem. Soft Comput 25, 4027–4052 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05431-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05431-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation