Abstract
Quality function deployment (QFD) is a planning and problem-solving tool that is gaining acceptance for translating customer requirements into the technical attributes. Deriving the rating of technical attributes (TAs) is a crucial step in QFD. However, the prioritization of TAs may be misleading in conventional QFD because of the uncertainty in linguistic data and result randomness. This study proposes a novel method to rate TAs based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, continuous ordered weighted averaging aggregation operator, Choquet integral, K-additive measures, and mixed integer programming. Firstly, the continuous ordered weighted averaging aggregation operator is proposed under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment to reflect individuals’ risk attitudes. Then, K-additive measures and Choquet integral are integrated to consider the correlation among customer requirements. Finally, the mixed integer programming is employed to prioritize technical attributes when maximizing the utility of design company and minimizing the group disagreements. The proposed method could rank TAs more robustly. An example of robot perception system design is cited to demonstrate the application of the method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data analysed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Abel E, Mikhailov L, Keane J (2018) Inconsistency reduction in decision making via multi-objective optimisation. Eur J Oper Res 267:212–226
Akao J (1990) Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design, translated by glenn h. Productivity Press, Cambridge
Akkawuttiwanich P, Yenradee P (2018) Fuzzy QFD approach for managing SCOR performance indicators. Comput Ind Eng 122:189–201
Atanassov K, Gargov G (1999) Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31:343–349
Babbar C, Amin SH (2018) A multi-objective mathematical model integrating environmental concerns for supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy QFD in beverages industry. Expert Syst Appl 92:27–38
Bevilacqua M, Ciarapica F, Giacchetta G (2006) A fuzzy-QFD approach to supplier selection. J Purch Supply Manag 12:14–27
Buyukozkan G, Cifci G (2015) An extended quality function deployment incorporating fuzzy logic and GDM under different preference structures. Int J Comput Int Sys 8(3):438–454
Candeloro D, Mesiar R, Sambucini AR (2019) A special class of fuzzy measures: Choquet integral and applications. Fuzzy Set Syst 355:83–99
Carnevalli JA, Miguel PC (2008) Review, analysis and classifcation of the literature on QFD-types of research, difculties and benefts. Int J Prod Econ 114(2):737–754
Chan LK, Wu ML (2002) Quality function deployment: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 143:463–497
Chen Y, Fung RY, Tang J (2006) Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator. Eur J Oper Res 174:1553–1566
Chen Y, Ran Y, Huang G, Xiao L, Zhang G (2021) A new integrated MCDM approach for improving QFD based on DEMATEL and extended MULTIMOORA under uncertainty environment. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107222
Chen N, Xu Z, Xia M (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 37:528–540
Combarro EF, Miranda P (2010) On the structure of the k-additive fuzzy measures. Fuzzy Set Syst 161:2314–2327
Dat LQ, Phuong TT, Kao HP, Chou SY, Van Nghia P (2015) A new integrated fuzzy QFD approach for market segments evaluation and selection. Appl Math Model 39:3653–3665
Dinçer H, Yüksel S, Martínez L (2019) Balanced scorecard-based analysis about european energy investment policies: a hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with quality function deployment. Expert Syst Appl 115:152–171
Efe B, Yerlikaya MA, Efe MF (2020) Mobile phone selection based on a novel quality function deployment approach. Soft Comput 24(5):15447–15461
Eleftheriadis S, Duffour P, Mumovic D (2018) Participatory decision-support model in the context of building structural design embedding BIM with QFD. Adv Eng Inform 38:695–711
Fargnoli M, Haber N (2019) A practical ANP-QFD methodology for dealing with requirements’ inner dependency in PSS development. Comput Ind Eng 127:536–548
French S, Maule J, Papamichail N (2009) Decision behaviour, analysis and support. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Guo K, Li W (2010) A C-OWA operator-based method for aggregating intuitionistic fuzzy information and its application to decision making under uncertainty. Int J Digit Content Technol Appl 4:140–147
Haktanır E, Kahraman C (2019) A novel interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy QFD method and its application to solar photovoltaic technology development. Comput Ind Eng 132:361–372
Hammer PL, Holzman R (1992) Approximations of pseudo-Boolean functions; applications to game theory. Zeitschrift Fur Oper Res 36:3–21
Huang J, You XY, Liu HC, Si SL (2019) New approach for quality function deployment based on proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and prospect theory. Int J Prod Res 57(5):1283–1299
Huang J, Mao LX, Liu HC, Song MS (2021) Quality function deployment improvement: a bibliometric analysis and literature review. Qual Quan 1-20
Joshi D, Kumar S (2016) Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 248:183–191
Kahraman C, Ertay T, Buyukozkan G (2006) A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. Eur J Oper Res 171(2):390–411
Kim DH, Kim KJ (2009) Robustness indices and robust prioritization in QFD. Expert Syst Appl 36:2651–2658
Kong D, Chang T, Wang Q, Sun H, Dai W (2018) A threat assessment method of group targets based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making. Appl Soft Comput 67:350–369
Liu B, Shen Y, Chen X, Chen Y, Wang X (2014) A partial binary tree DEA-DA cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making problems. Inf Fusion 18:119–130
Liu HC, You JX, Duan CY (2019) An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int J Prod Econ 207:163–172
Liu HC, Wu SM, Wang ZL, Li XY (2021) A new method for quality function deployment with extended prospect theory under hesitant linguistic environment. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 68(2):442–451
Liu YY, Han YL, Zhou J, Chen YZ, Zhong SY (2018) Establishing the relationship matrix in QFD based on fuzzy regression models with optimized h values. Soft Comput 22(17):5603–5615
Lizarelli FL, Osiro L, Ganga G, Mendes G (2021) Integration of SERVQUAL, analytical Kano, and QFD using fuzzy approaches to support improvement decisions in an entrepreneurial education service. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107786
Miao Y, Liu Y, Chen Y, Zhou J, Ji P (2017) Two uncertain chance-constrained programming models to setting target levels of design attributes in quality function deployment. Inf Sci 415:156–170
Mistarihi MZ, Okour RA, Mumani AA (2020) An integration of a QFD model with fuzzy-ANP approach for determining the importance weights for engineering characteristics of the proposed wheelchair design. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106136
Nahm YE, Ishikawa H, Inoue M (2013) New rating methods to prioritize customer requirements in QFD with incomplete customer preferences. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(9–12):1587–1604
Narayanamoorthy S, Geetha S, Rakkiyappan R, Joo YH (2019) Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy entropy based VIKOR method for industrial robots selection. Expert Syst Appl 121:28–37
Nguyen TD, Lo AW (2012) Robust ranking and portfolio optimization. Eur J Oper Res 221:407–416
Partovi FY, Corredoira RA (2002) Quality function deployment for the good of soccer. Eur J Oper Res 137:642–656
Ping Y, Liu R, Lin W, Liu HC (2002) A new integrated approach for engineering characteristic prioritization in quality function deployment. Adv Eng Infdrm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101099
Ren Z, Xu Z, Wang H (2018) Normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to environmental quality evaluation. Knowl-Based Syst 159:286–297
Song W, Ming X, Han Y (2014) Prioritising technical attributes in QFD under vague environment: a rough-grey relational analysis approach. Int J Prod Res 52(18):5528–5545
Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2001) Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 118:467–477
Wang YM, Chin KS (2011) Technical importance ratings in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy normalization and fuzzy weighted average. Comput Math Appl 62:4207–4221
Wasserman GS (1993) On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Trans 25(3):59–65
Wei CP, Wang P, Zhang YZ (2011) Entropy, similarity measure of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Inf Sci 181:4273–4286
Wu SM, Liu HC, Wang LE (2016) Hesitant fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for quality function deployment: a case study in electric vehicle. Int J Prod Res 55(15):4436–4449
Wu T, Liu X, Qin J, Herrera F (2021) An interval type-2 fuzzy Kano-prospect-TOPSIS based QFD model: application to Chinese e-commerce service design. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107665
Wu X, Nie L, Xu M (2017) Robust fuzzy quality function deployment based on the mean-end-chain concept: service station evaluation problem for rail catering services. Eur J Oper Res 263:974–995
Xu Z (2006) AC-OWA operator-based approach to decision making with interval fuzzy preference relation. Int J Intell Syst 21:1289–1298
Xu Z, Xia M (2012) Hesitant fuzzy entropy and cross-entropy and their use in multiattribute decision-making. Int J Intell Syst 27:799–822
Yan HB, Ma T (2015) A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority. Eur J Oper Res 241(3):815–829
Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18:183–190
Yazdani M, Kahraman C, Zarate P, Onar SC (2019) A fuzzy multi attribute decision framework with integration of QFD and grey relational analysis. Expert Syst Appl 115:474–485
Yazdani M, Wang ZX, Chan F (2020) A decision support model based on the combined structure of DEMATEL. QFD and fuzzy values. Soft Comput 24(16):12449–12468
Yu L, Wang L, Bao Y (2018) Technical attributes ratings in fuzzy QFD by integrating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and Choquet integral. Soft Comput 22:2015–2024
Zhang Z (2013) Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their application in group decision-making. J Appl Math 2013:1–33
Zhang H, Zhang W, Mei C (2009) Entropy of interval-valued fuzzy sets based on distance and its relationship with similarity measure. Knowl-Based Syst 22:449–454
Zhong S, Zhou J, Chen Y (2014) Determination of target values of engineering characteristics in QFD using a fuzzy chance-constrained modelling approach. Neurocomputing 142:125–135
Funding
This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, “Research on Random Symmetrical Cone Complementarity Problems and Related Topics” (No: 11671250).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to this work.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
According to Möbius transformation, we could get the fuzzy measures of CRs.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L., Yu, L. & Ni, Z. A novel IVIF QFD considering both the correlations of customer requirements and the ranking uncertainty of technical attributes. Soft Comput 26, 4199–4213 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06892-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06892-5