Skip to main content
Log in

A novel IVIF QFD considering both the correlations of customer requirements and the ranking uncertainty of technical attributes

  • Fuzzy systems and their mathematics
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a planning and problem-solving tool that is gaining acceptance for translating customer requirements into the technical attributes. Deriving the rating of technical attributes (TAs) is a crucial step in QFD. However, the prioritization of TAs may be misleading in conventional QFD because of the uncertainty in linguistic data and result randomness. This study proposes a novel method to rate TAs based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, continuous ordered weighted averaging aggregation operator, Choquet integral, K-additive measures, and mixed integer programming. Firstly, the continuous ordered weighted averaging aggregation operator is proposed under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment to reflect individuals’ risk attitudes. Then, K-additive measures and Choquet integral are integrated to consider the correlation among customer requirements. Finally, the mixed integer programming is employed to prioritize technical attributes when maximizing the utility of design company and minimizing the group disagreements. The proposed method could rank TAs more robustly. An example of robot perception system design is cited to demonstrate the application of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Abel E, Mikhailov L, Keane J (2018) Inconsistency reduction in decision making via multi-objective optimisation. Eur J Oper Res 267:212–226

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akao J (1990) Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design, translated by glenn h. Productivity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkawuttiwanich P, Yenradee P (2018) Fuzzy QFD approach for managing SCOR performance indicators. Comput Ind Eng 122:189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov K, Gargov G (1999) Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31:343–349

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Babbar C, Amin SH (2018) A multi-objective mathematical model integrating environmental concerns for supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy QFD in beverages industry. Expert Syst Appl 92:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevilacqua M, Ciarapica F, Giacchetta G (2006) A fuzzy-QFD approach to supplier selection. J Purch Supply Manag 12:14–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyukozkan G, Cifci G (2015) An extended quality function deployment incorporating fuzzy logic and GDM under different preference structures. Int J Comput Int Sys 8(3):438–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candeloro D, Mesiar R, Sambucini AR (2019) A special class of fuzzy measures: Choquet integral and applications. Fuzzy Set Syst 355:83–99

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevalli JA, Miguel PC (2008) Review, analysis and classifcation of the literature on QFD-types of research, difculties and benefts. Int J Prod Econ 114(2):737–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan LK, Wu ML (2002) Quality function deployment: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 143:463–497

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Fung RY, Tang J (2006) Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator. Eur J Oper Res 174:1553–1566

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Ran Y, Huang G, Xiao L, Zhang G (2021) A new integrated MCDM approach for improving QFD based on DEMATEL and extended MULTIMOORA under uncertainty environment. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen N, Xu Z, Xia M (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 37:528–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combarro EF, Miranda P (2010) On the structure of the k-additive fuzzy measures. Fuzzy Set Syst 161:2314–2327

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dat LQ, Phuong TT, Kao HP, Chou SY, Van Nghia P (2015) A new integrated fuzzy QFD approach for market segments evaluation and selection. Appl Math Model 39:3653–3665

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dinçer H, Yüksel S, Martínez L (2019) Balanced scorecard-based analysis about european energy investment policies: a hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with quality function deployment. Expert Syst Appl 115:152–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efe B, Yerlikaya MA, Efe MF (2020) Mobile phone selection based on a novel quality function deployment approach. Soft Comput 24(5):15447–15461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eleftheriadis S, Duffour P, Mumovic D (2018) Participatory decision-support model in the context of building structural design embedding BIM with QFD. Adv Eng Inform 38:695–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fargnoli M, Haber N (2019) A practical ANP-QFD methodology for dealing with requirements’ inner dependency in PSS development. Comput Ind Eng 127:536–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French S, Maule J, Papamichail N (2009) Decision behaviour, analysis and support. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guo K, Li W (2010) A C-OWA operator-based method for aggregating intuitionistic fuzzy information and its application to decision making under uncertainty. Int J Digit Content Technol Appl 4:140–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Haktanır E, Kahraman C (2019) A novel interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy QFD method and its application to solar photovoltaic technology development. Comput Ind Eng 132:361–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer PL, Holzman R (1992) Approximations of pseudo-Boolean functions; applications to game theory. Zeitschrift Fur Oper Res 36:3–21

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, You XY, Liu HC, Si SL (2019) New approach for quality function deployment based on proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and prospect theory. Int J Prod Res 57(5):1283–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Mao LX, Liu HC, Song MS (2021) Quality function deployment improvement: a bibliometric analysis and literature review. Qual Quan 1-20

  • Joshi D, Kumar S (2016) Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 248:183–191

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Ertay T, Buyukozkan G (2006) A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. Eur J Oper Res 171(2):390–411

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Kim KJ (2009) Robustness indices and robust prioritization in QFD. Expert Syst Appl 36:2651–2658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong D, Chang T, Wang Q, Sun H, Dai W (2018) A threat assessment method of group targets based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making. Appl Soft Comput 67:350–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Shen Y, Chen X, Chen Y, Wang X (2014) A partial binary tree DEA-DA cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making problems. Inf Fusion 18:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, You JX, Duan CY (2019) An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int J Prod Econ 207:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, Wu SM, Wang ZL, Li XY (2021) A new method for quality function deployment with extended prospect theory under hesitant linguistic environment. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 68(2):442–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YY, Han YL, Zhou J, Chen YZ, Zhong SY (2018) Establishing the relationship matrix in QFD based on fuzzy regression models with optimized h values. Soft Comput 22(17):5603–5615

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lizarelli FL, Osiro L, Ganga G, Mendes G (2021) Integration of SERVQUAL, analytical Kano, and QFD using fuzzy approaches to support improvement decisions in an entrepreneurial education service. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao Y, Liu Y, Chen Y, Zhou J, Ji P (2017) Two uncertain chance-constrained programming models to setting target levels of design attributes in quality function deployment. Inf Sci 415:156–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistarihi MZ, Okour RA, Mumani AA (2020) An integration of a QFD model with fuzzy-ANP approach for determining the importance weights for engineering characteristics of the proposed wheelchair design. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahm YE, Ishikawa H, Inoue M (2013) New rating methods to prioritize customer requirements in QFD with incomplete customer preferences. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(9–12):1587–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanamoorthy S, Geetha S, Rakkiyappan R, Joo YH (2019) Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy entropy based VIKOR method for industrial robots selection. Expert Syst Appl 121:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TD, Lo AW (2012) Robust ranking and portfolio optimization. Eur J Oper Res 221:407–416

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Partovi FY, Corredoira RA (2002) Quality function deployment for the good of soccer. Eur J Oper Res 137:642–656

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ping Y, Liu R, Lin W, Liu HC (2002) A new integrated approach for engineering characteristic prioritization in quality function deployment. Adv Eng Infdrm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Z, Xu Z, Wang H (2018) Normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to environmental quality evaluation. Knowl-Based Syst 159:286–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song W, Ming X, Han Y (2014) Prioritising technical attributes in QFD under vague environment: a rough-grey relational analysis approach. Int J Prod Res 52(18):5528–5545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2001) Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 118:467–477

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Chin KS (2011) Technical importance ratings in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy normalization and fuzzy weighted average. Comput Math Appl 62:4207–4221

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman GS (1993) On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Trans 25(3):59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei CP, Wang P, Zhang YZ (2011) Entropy, similarity measure of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Inf Sci 181:4273–4286

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu SM, Liu HC, Wang LE (2016) Hesitant fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for quality function deployment: a case study in electric vehicle. Int J Prod Res 55(15):4436–4449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu T, Liu X, Qin J, Herrera F (2021) An interval type-2 fuzzy Kano-prospect-TOPSIS based QFD model: application to Chinese e-commerce service design. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Nie L, Xu M (2017) Robust fuzzy quality function deployment based on the mean-end-chain concept: service station evaluation problem for rail catering services. Eur J Oper Res 263:974–995

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2006) AC-OWA operator-based approach to decision making with interval fuzzy preference relation. Int J Intell Syst 21:1289–1298

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Xia M (2012) Hesitant fuzzy entropy and cross-entropy and their use in multiattribute decision-making. Int J Intell Syst 27:799–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan HB, Ma T (2015) A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority. Eur J Oper Res 241(3):815–829

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18:183–190

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani M, Kahraman C, Zarate P, Onar SC (2019) A fuzzy multi attribute decision framework with integration of QFD and grey relational analysis. Expert Syst Appl 115:474–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani M, Wang ZX, Chan F (2020) A decision support model based on the combined structure of DEMATEL. QFD and fuzzy values. Soft Comput 24(16):12449–12468

  • Yu L, Wang L, Bao Y (2018) Technical attributes ratings in fuzzy QFD by integrating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and Choquet integral. Soft Comput 22:2015–2024

  • Zhang Z (2013) Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their application in group decision-making. J Appl Math 2013:1–33

  • Zhang H, Zhang W, Mei C (2009) Entropy of interval-valued fuzzy sets based on distance and its relationship with similarity measure. Knowl-Based Syst 22:449–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong S, Zhou J, Chen Y (2014) Determination of target values of engineering characteristics in QFD using a fuzzy chance-constrained modelling approach. Neurocomputing 142:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, “Research on Random Symmetrical Cone Complementarity Problems and Related Topics” (No: 11671250).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongxin Ni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to this work.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

According to Möbius transformation, we could get the fuzzy measures of CRs.

$$\begin{aligned}&W_{\varnothing }=\frac{1}{2}\sum _{i\in {N}}W_{i}-\frac{1}{6}\sum _{i,j\in {N}}I_{ij}\\&\qquad =\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{6}\times {(0.3+0.2+0.1)}=0.4\\&a(\varnothing )=W_{\varnothing }-\frac{1}{2}\sum _{i\in {N}}W_{i}+\frac{1}{6}\sum _{i,j\in {N}}I_{ij}=0\\&a(1)=W_{1}-\frac{1}{2}\sum _{j\in {N/1}}I_{1j}\\&\qquad \,=0.42-\frac{1}{2}\times {(0.3+0.1)}=0.22 a(2)\\&\qquad \,=W_{2}-\frac{1}{2}\sum _{j\in {N/2}}I_{2j}=0.28-\frac{1}{2}\times {(0.3+0.2)}\\&\qquad \,=0.03\\&a(3)=W_{3}-\frac{1}{2}\sum _{j\in {N/3}}I_{3j}=0.30-\frac{1}{2}\times {(0.2+0.1)}\\&\qquad \,\,=0.15\\&a(12)=I_{12}=0.3,a(13)=I_{13}=0.1,a(23)=I_{23}=0.2\\&\varphi {(CR_1)}=a(\varnothing )+a(1)=0.22,\varphi {(CR_2)}=a(\varnothing )+a(2)\\&\qquad \quad \,\,\,\,\,=0.03\\&\varphi {(CR_3)}=a(\varnothing )+a(3)=0.15,\varphi {(CR_1,CR_2)}=a(\varnothing )\\&\quad \qquad \qquad \quad +a(1)+a(2)+a(12)=0.55\\&\varphi {(CR_1,CR_3)}=a(\varnothing )+a(1)+a(3)+a(13)=0.47\\&\varphi {(CR_3,CR_2)}=a(\varnothing )+a(2)+a(3)+a(23)=0.38\\ \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Yu, L. & Ni, Z. A novel IVIF QFD considering both the correlations of customer requirements and the ranking uncertainty of technical attributes. Soft Comput 26, 4199–4213 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06892-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06892-5

Keywords

Navigation