Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A hybrid decision-making framework to manage occupational stress in project-based organizations

  • Application of soft computing
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to recent studies in the field of human resource management (HRM), especially in project-based organizations (PBOs), stress is recognized as a factor that has a paramount significance on the performance of staff. Previous studies in organizational stress management have mainly focused on identifying job stressors and their effects on organizations. Contrary to the previous studies, this paper aims to propose a comprehensive decision-support system that includes identifying stressors, assessing organizational stress levels, and providing solutions to improve the performance of the organization. A questionnaire is designed and distributed among 170 senior managers of a major project-based organization in the field of the energy industry in Iran to determine organizational stressors. Based on the questionnaire results and considering the best worst method (BWM) as an approach to determine the weighting vector, the importance degree of each stressor is calculated. In the next stage, a decision-support model is developed to assess the stress level of a PBO through fuzzy inference systems (FIS). Some main advantages of the proposed hybrid decision-support model include (i) achieving high-reliable results by not-so-time-consuming computational volume and (ii) maintaining flexibility in adding new criteria to assess the occupational stress levels in PBOs. Based on the obtained results, six organizational stressors, including job incongruity, poor organizational structure, poor project environment, work overload, poor job promotion, and type A behavior, are identified. It is also found that the level of organizational stress is not ideal. Finally, some main recommendations are proposed to manage occupational stresses at the optimum level in the considered sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Aitken A, Crawford L (2007) Coping with stress: Dispositional coping strategies of project managers. Int J Project Manage 25(7):666–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Kahraman C, Zahid K (2021a) Extension of TOPSIS model to the decision-making under complex spherical fuzzy information. Soft Comput 25(16):10771–10795

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Peng X, Sattar A (2021c) A new decision-making model using complex intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators. Soft Comput 25(10):7059–7086

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Naz S, Edalatpanah SA, Mehreen R (2021b) Group decision-making framework under linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy Einstein models. Soft Comput 25(15):10309–10334

    Google Scholar 

  • Alamroshan F, La’li M, Yahyaei M (2021) The green-agile supplier selection problem for the medical devices: a hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(5):6793–6811

    Google Scholar 

  • Altan A, Karasu S (2019) The effect of kernel values in support vector machine to forecasting performance of financial time series. J Cognit Syst 4(1):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Amindoust A, Saghafinia A (2017) Textile supplier selection in sustainable supply chain using a modular fuzzy inference system model. J Text Inst 108(7):1250–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Amindoust A, Ahmed S, Saghafinia A, Bahreininejad A (2012) Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput 12(6):1668–1677

    Google Scholar 

  • Amole BB, Adebiyi SO, Dakare O (2018) Multi-criteria decision analysis of occupational stress among healthcare professionals in Nigeria. Prog Health Sci 8(1):113–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Aria S, Torabi SA, Nayeri S (2020) A hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach to select the best online-taxis business. Adv Ind Eng 54(2):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Aruna S (2020) Burn-out and stress percipience benefits of a stress management program by autogenic relaxation training for teachers: a pilot study. Int J Res Pharm Sci 11(1):480–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslan, O., Altan, A., & Hacioglu, R. (2017). The control of blast furnace top gas pressure by using fuzzy PID. In: proceedings of the fifth international conference on advances in mechanical and robotics engineering–AMRE, pp. 22–26

  • Bachkirova T (2012a) The role of the self and identification with an organisation as factors influencing work-related stress: implications for helping. Couns Psychol Q 25(1):49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Beehr TA (2014) Psychological stress in the workplace (psychology revivals). Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle BJ (1986) Recent developments in role theory. Ann Rev Sociol 12(1):67–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen P, Edwards P, Lingard H, Cattell K (2014) Occupational stress and job demand, control and support factors among construction project consultants. Int J Project Manage 32(7):1273–1284

    Google Scholar 

  • Calitz T, Roux A, Strydom H (2014) Factors that affect social workers’ job satisfaction, stress and burnout. Soc Work 50(2):153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvin B, Rohmer O, Spitzenstetter F, Raffin D, Schimchowitsch S, Louvet E (2014) Assessment of job stress factors in a context of organizational change. Revue Européenne De Psychologie Appliquée/european Review of Applied Psychology 64(6):299–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. H., & Hsieh, C. H. (1999). Optimization of fuzzy simple inventory models. In: FUZZ-IEEE’99. 1999 IEEE international fuzzy systems. Conference proceedings (Cat. No. 99CH36315), vol. 1, pp. 240–244

  • Delice EK, Can GF (2020) A new approach for ergonomic risk assessment integrating KEMIRA, best–worst and MCDM methods. Soft Comput 24(19):15093–15110

    Google Scholar 

  • Deniz N, Noyan A, Ertosun ÖG (2015) Linking person-job fit to job stress: the mediating effect of perceived person-organization fit. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 207:369–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Noia A, Martino A, Montanari P, Rizzi A (2020) Supervised machine learning techniques and genetic optimization for occupational diseases risk prediction. Soft Comput 24(6):4393–4406

    Google Scholar 

  • Eatough EM, Chang C-H, Miloslavic SA, Johnson RE (2011) Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 96(3):619

    Google Scholar 

  • Elovainio M, Kivimauki M, Eccles M, Sinervo T (2002) Team climate and procedural justice as predictors of occupational strain 1. J Appl Soc Psychol 32(2):359–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Enshassi A, El-Rayyes Y, Alkilani S (2015) Job stress, job burnout and safety performance in the Palestinian construction industry. J Financ Manag Prop Constr 20(2):170–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Enshassi, A., & Al Swaity, E. (2015). Key stressors leading to construction professionals’ stress in the Gaza strip, Palestine. Key Stressors Leading to Construction Professionals’ Stress in the Gaza Strip, Palestine, 20(2)

  • Fallahpour A, Wong KY, Rajoo S, Mardani A (2019) An integrated fuzzy carbon management-based model for suppliers’ performance evaluation and selection in green supply chain management. Int J Fuzzy Syst 22(2):712–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser M (1986) A psychobiological framework for research on human stress and coping. In: Appley MH, Trumbull R (eds) Dynamics of stress. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmelch, W. H. (1977). Beyond stress to effective management. OSSC Bulletin Vol. 20, Nos. 9 and 10

  • Hallberg UE, Johansson G, Schaufeli WB (2007) Type A behavior and work situation: associations with burnout and work engagement. Scand J Psychol 48(2):135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaney CA, Israel BA, House JS (1994) Chronic job insecurity among automobile workers: effects on job satisfaction and health. Soc Sci Med 38(10):1431–1437

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahangiri M, Molaeifar H, Rajabi F, Banaee S (2020) Occupational stressors among farmers in Iran using fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making methods. J Agromed 25(1):28–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannoo Z, Yap BW, Haron H (2015) Evaluation of the job stress survey and its factor structure. Qual Quant 49(2):711–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz D, Kahn RL (1978) The social psychology of organizations, vol 2. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman RE (1985) Job redesign and productivity: a review of the evidence. Natl Product Rev 4(3):237–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Lait J, Wallace J (2002) Stress at work: a study of organizational-professional conflict and unmet expectations. Relations Industrielles/industrial Relations 57(3):463–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert EG, Qureshi H, Frank J, Klahm C, Smith B (2018) Job stress, job involvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment and their associations with job burnout among Indian police officers: a research note. J Police Crim Psychol 33(2):85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung M, Ng ST, Skitmore M, Cheung S (2005) Critical stressors influencing construction estimators in Hong Kong. Constr Manag Econ 23(1):33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Huang J, Feng Y (2020b) Human performance modeling and its uncertainty factors affecting decision making: a survery. Soft Comput 24(4):2851–2871

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Shu Q, Huang H, Bo W, Wang L, Wu H (2020a) Associations of occupational stress, workplace violence and organizational support on chronic fatigue symptoms among nurses. J Adv Nurs 76(5):1151–1161

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CH (2020) Strategies of managing coach driver job stress for sustainable coach tourism industry—the use of DANP-V model. Sustainability 12(9):3690

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CH, Tzeng GH, Lee MH, Tseng HL, Lee PY (2012) Using a hybrid MCDM model combining fuzzy DEMATEL technique to examine the job stress of coach driver. In: Watada J, Watanabe T, Phillips-Wren G, Howlett RJ, Jain LC (eds) Intelligent decision technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre PD, Gregersen T, Mercer S (2020) Language teachers’ coping strategies during the Covid-19 conversion to online teaching: correlations with stress, wellbeing and negative emotions. System 94:102352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald N, Ronayne T (1989) Jobs and their environment: the psychological impact of work in noise. Ir J Psychol 10(1):39–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner A, Witt K, LaMontagne AD, Niedhammer I (2018) Authors’ reply:‘response to:‘psychosocial job stressors and suicidality: a meta-analysis and systematic review’by Milneret al.’ Occup Environ Med 75(4):318

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes LC, Pinheiro PR, Pinheiro MCD, Simão Filho M, Nunes REC (2018) Toward a novel method to support decision-making process in health and behavioral factors analysis for the composition of IT projects teams. Neural Comput Appl 32(15):11019–11040

    Google Scholar 

  • Pena J, Nápoles G, Salgueiro Y (2020) Explicit methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study. Artif Intell Rev 53(5):3127–3152

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto JK, Dawood S, Pinto MB (2014a) Project management and burnout: implications of the demand–control–support model on project-based work. Int J Project Manage 32(4):578–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi F, Jahangiri M, Molaeifar H, Honarbakhsh M, Farhadi P (2018) Occupational stress among nurses and pre-hospital emergency staff: application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) method. EXCLI J 17:808

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi F, Molaeifar H, Jahangiri M, Taheri S, Banaee S, Farhadi P (2020) Occupational stressors among firefighters application of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) Techniques. Heliyon 6(4):e03820

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J (2016) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properties and a linear model. Omega 64:126–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J, Nispeling T, Sarkis J, Tavasszy L (2016) A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. J Clean Prod 135:577–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi M, Garosi A (2017) Personality traits predicting job burnout among staff (case study: central bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran). World Sci News 62:64–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayeekumar M, Karthik GM, Puhazholi S (2019) Hybrid intelligence system using fuzzy inference in cluster architecture for secured group communication. Soft Comput 23(8):2727–2734

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmer NK (2006) Job stress interventions and the organization of work. Scand J Work Environ Health 32(6):515–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Senaratne S, Rasagopalasingam V (2016) The causes and effects of work stress in construction project managers: the case in Sri Lanka. Int J Constr Manag 17(1):65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1977) The new science of management decision. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Siu O (2002) Occupational stressors and well-being among Chinese employees: the role of organisational commitment. Appl Psychol 51(4):527–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunay A, Altan A, Belge E, Hacioğlu R (2020) Investigation of route tracking performance with adaptive PID controller in quadrotor. Eur J Tech 10(1):160–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Taap Manshor A, Fontaine R, Siong Choy C (2003) Occupational stress among managers: a Malaysian survey. J Manag Psychol 18(6):622–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry DJ, Tonge L, Callan VJ (1995a) Employee adjustment to stress: the role of coping resources, situational factors, and coping responses. Anxiety Stress Coping 8(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah K, Khan MS, Lakhiar MT, Vighio AA, Sohu S (2018) Ranking of effects of construction delay: evidence from malaysian building projects. J Appl Eng Sci 8(1):79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, V. (1996). The human aspects of project management: human resource skills for the project manager, volume two

  • Wagman P, Ahlstrand I, Björk M, Håkansson C (2020) Occupational balance and its association with life satisfaction in men and women with rheumatoid arthritis. Musculoskeletal Care 18(2):187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte HD (1999) Job insecurity and psychological well-being: Review of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues. Eur J Work Organ Psy 8(2):155–177

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZS: Methodology, modeling, data analysis, and writing—original draft preparation, supervision; SN: Material preparation, modeling, data analysis, and writing—original draft preparation; RM: Material preparation, data collection, modeling, and writing—original draft preparation; MT: Methodology, modeling, and visualization; AF: Methodology, modeling, and data analysis; KYW: Methodology, modeling, data analysis, and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeinab Sazvar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Data avalability

The data sets generated during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 11, 12 and 13 .

Table 11 The experts’ opinions about the criteria for measuring the level of job stress at the organization
Table 12 The nomenclature
Table 13 Experts description

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sazvar, Z., Nayeri, S., Mirbagheri, R. et al. A hybrid decision-making framework to manage occupational stress in project-based organizations. Soft Comput 26, 12445–12460 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07143-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07143-3

Keywords