Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Dispatching and rebalancing for ride-sharing autonomous mobility-on-demand systems based on a fuzzy multi-criteria approach

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an integrated approach, of a multi-criteria decision-making framework and fuzzy multi-objective programming to optimize dispatching and rebalancing for Ride-sharing Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand (RAMoD) systems, whereby, a fleet of self-driving electric vehicles are coordinated to service on-demand travel requests and eventually allowing multiple passengers to share rides. Specifically, the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and the Fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution are first integrated in order to analyze customer preferences, prioritize their attitudes toward autonomous vehicles, and then to rank fleet vehicles according to these prioritizations. Next, leveraging the ranks of vehicles, we introduce a new Multi-Objective Possibilistic Linear Programming (MOPLP) model, considering realistic constraints and handling the uncertain nature of some critical data affecting RAMoD systems. Three conflicting goals are considered simultaneously which are (i) to minimize the lost customer requests, (ii) to minimize the total transportation cost and (iii) to improve customer satisfaction. This MOPLP model is converted to an equivalent crisp MOLP through applying appropriate strategies and the goal programming method is called to solve this MOLP and find an efficient compromise solution. Finally, the applicability and efficiency of the proposed approach are presented through an illustrative example. Collectively, this work provides a unified framework for controlling and analyzing RAMoD systems, which includes a wide range of modeling options (e.g., the inclusion of the uncertain future demand), and provides the first correlation between the dispatching and rebalancing decisions, and the process of analyzing customer preferences toward autonomous vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

  • Abdel-Basset M, Gamal A, Chakrabortty RK, Ryan M (2021) A new hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for location selection of sustainable offshore wind energy stations: a case study. J Clean Prod 280:124462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abduljabbar R, Dia H, Liyanage S, Bagloee SA (2019) Applications of artificial intelligence in transport: an overview. Sustainability 11(1):189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agatz N, Erera A, Savelsbergh M, Wang X (2012) Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: a review. Eur J Oper Res 223(2):295–303

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akbar MA, Mahmood S, Shafiq M, Alsanad A, Alsanad AAA, Gumaei A (2020) Identification and prioritization of DevOps success factors using fuzzy-AHP approach. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05150-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksaraylı M, Pala O (2018) A polynomial goal programming model for portfolio optimization based on entropy and higher moments. Expert Syst Appl 94:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin F, Fahmi A, Abdullah S (2019) Dealer using a new trapezoidal cubic hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS method and application to group decision-making program. Soft Comput 23(14):5353–5366

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barma PS, Dutta J, Mukherjee A (2019) A 2-opt guided discrete antlion optimization algorithm for multi-depot vehicle routing problem. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 2(2):112–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Başhan V, Demirel H, Gul M (2020) An FMEA-based TOPSIS approach under single valued neutrosophic sets for maritime risk evaluation: the case of ship navigation safety. Soft Comput 24(24):18749–18764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05108-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskett F, Chandy KM, Muntz RR, Palacios FG (1975) Open, closed, and mixed networks of queues with different classes of customers. J ACM 22(2):248–260

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beirigo B, Schulte F, Negenborn RR (2019) A business class for autonomous mobility-on-demand: modeling service quality in dynamic ridesharing systems. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30633.34400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan G, Feyzıo\(\tilde{{\rm g}}\)lu O (2004) A fuzzy-logic-based decision-making approach for new product development. Int J Prod Econ 90(1):27–45

  • Büyüközkan G, Gocer F (2017) An intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM approach for effective hazardous waste management. In: Kahraman C, Sari İU (eds) Intelligence systems in environmental management: theory and applications. Springer, Cham, pp 21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y, Wang H, Ong GP, Meng Q, Lee DH (2019) Investigating user perception on autonomous vehicle (AV) based mobility-on-demand (MOD) services in Singapore using the logit kernel approach. Transportation 46(6):2063–2080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95(3):649–655

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CT (2007) Binary fuzzy goal programming. Eur J Oper Res 180(1):29–37

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Ferguson RO (1995) Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Manag Sci 1(2):138–151

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen IS (2016) A combined MCDM model based on DEMATEL and ANP for the selection of airline service quality improvement criteria: a study based on the Taiwanese airline industry. J Air Transp Manag 57:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TD, Kockelman KM, Hanna JP (2016) Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transp Res Part a Policy Pract 94:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Y, Liu W, RaniAlrasheedi PM (2021) Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers for the circular economy using Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo decision-making approach in the manufacturing sector. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 171:120951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das SK, Mandal T, Edalatpanah SA (2017) A new approach for solving fully fuzzy linear fractional programming problems using the multi-objective linear programming. RAIRO-Oper Res 51(1):285–297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Das SK, Edalatpanah SA, Mandal T (2018) A proposed model for solving fuzzy linear fractional programming problem: numerical Point of View. J Comput Sci 25:367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De M, Das B, Maiti M (2020) EPL models with fuzzy imperfect production system including carbon emission: a fuzzy differential equation approach. Soft Comput 24(2):1293–1313

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dhahri I, Chabchoub H (2007) Nonlinear goal programming models quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chain based on ARIMA parameters. Eur J Oper Res 177(3):1800–1810

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Z, Tan W, Lee WJ, Pan X, Gao S (2021) Integrated operation model for autonomous mobility on demand fleet and battery swapping station. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 57:5593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (2012) Possibility theory: an approach to computerized processing of uncertainty. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Fargier H, Fortemps P (2003) Fuzzy scheduling: modelling flexible constraints vs. coping with incomplete knowledge. Eur J Oper Res 147(2):231–252

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Edalatpanah SA (2020) Neutrosophic structured element. Expert Syst 37(5):e12542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehsani E, Kazemi N, Olugu EU, Grosse EH, Schwindl K (2017) Applying fuzzy multi-objective linear programming to a project management decision with nonlinear fuzzy membership functions. Neural Comput Appl 28(8):2193–2206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erceg Ž, Mularifović F (2019) Integrated MCDM model for processes optimization in supply chain management in wood company. Oper Res Eng Sci Theory Appl 2(1):37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker C, Gast N (2016) Incentives and redistribution in homogeneous bike-sharing systems with stations of finite capacity. Eur J Transp Log 5(3):261–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaderi H, Moini A, Pishvaee MS (2018) A multi-objective robust possibilistic programming approach to sustainable switchgrass-based bioethanol supply chain network design. J Clean Prod 179:368–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasempoor Anaraki M, Vladislav DS, Karbasian M, Osintsev N, Nozick V (2021) Evaluation and selection of supplier in supply chain with fuzzy analytical network process approach. J Fuzzy Extens Appl 2(1):69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Günay EE, Gül E, Okudan K, Atousa Z (2021) A multi-objective robust possibilistic programming approach to sustainable public transportation network design. Fuzzy Sets Syst 422:106–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gündoğdu FK, Kahraman C (2020) A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application. Soft Comput 24(6):4607–4621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörl S, Ruch C, Becker F, Frazzoli E, Axhausen KW (2019) Fleet operational policies for automated mobility: a simulation assessment for Zurich. Transp Res Part c Emerg Technol 102:20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörl S, Becker F, Axhausen KW (2021) Simulation of price, customer behaviour and system impact for a cost-covering automated taxi system in Zurich. Transp Res Part c Emerg Technol 123:102974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu HM, Wang WP (2001) Possibilistic programming in production planning of assemble-to-order environments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 119(1):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu H, Li J, Li X (2018) A credibilistic goal programming model for inventory routing problem with hazardous materials. Soft Comput 22(17):5803–5816

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu YP, You XY, Wang L, Liu HC (2019) An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis based on uncertain linguistic GRA–TOPSIS method. Soft Comput 23(18):8801–8814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias R, Rossi F, Zhang R (2019) Pavone M (2019) A BCMP network approach to modeling and controlling autonomous mobility-on-demand systems. Int J Robot Res 38(2–3):357–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias R, Rossi F, Wang K, Hallac D, Leskovec J, Pavone M (2018) Data-driven model predictive control of autonomous mobility-on-demand systems. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) 2018 May 21 (pp. 1–7). IEEE

  • Jabbarzadeh A (2018) Application of the AHP and TOPSIS in project management. J Project Manag 3(2):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JR (1957) Networks of waiting lines. Oper Res 5(4):518–521

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jain P, Tiwari AK, Som T (2020) A fitting model based intuitionistic fuzzy rough feature selection. Eng Appl Artif Intell 89:103421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javanshour F, Dia H, Duncan G (2019) Exploring the performance of autonomous mobility on-demand systems under demand uncertainty. Transp Transp Sci 15(2):698–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones D, Tamiz M (2010) Practical goal programming, vol 141. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kane L, Sidibe H, Kane S, Bado H, Konate M, Diawara D, Diabate L (2021) A simplified new approach for solving fully fuzzy transportation problems with involving triangular fuzzy numbers. J Fuzzy Extens Appl 2(1):89–105

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karasan A, Ilbahar E, Kahraman C (2019) A novel pythagorean fuzzy AHP and its application to landfill site selection problem. Soft Comput 23(21):10953–10968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaska M, Tolga A C (2020) Blockchain software selection for a maritime organization with MCDM method. In: International conference on intelligent and fuzzy systems (pp. 543–549). Springer, Cham

  • Kaucic M, Barbini F, Verdù FJC (2020) Polynomial goal programming and particle swarm optimization for enhanced indexation. Soft Comput 24(12):8535–8551

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1988) Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science. North Holland, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1991) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic. Van Nostrand, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kettani O, Aouni B, Martel JM (2004) The double role of the weight factor in the goal programming model. Comput Oper Res 31(11):1833–1845

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Kaushik, M.K., Kumar, R. and Khan, W.(2022) Investigating the barriers of blockchain technology integrated food supply chain: a BWM approach. Benchmark Int J

  • Khemiri R, Elbedoui-Maktouf K, Grabot B, Zouari B (2017a) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for managing performance and risk in integrated procurement–production planning. Int J Prod Res 55(18):5305–5329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khemiri R, Naija M, Exposito E (2021) Shared autonomous mobility on demand: a fuzzy-based approach and its performance in the presence of uncertainty. In: van Sinderen M, Maciaszek LA, Fill H-G (eds) Software technologies: 15th international conference, ICSOFT 2020, Online Event, July 7–9, 2020, Revised Selected Papers. Springer, Cham, pp 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83007-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khemiri R, Expósito E (2020) Fuzzy Multi-objective Optimization for Ride-sharing Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems. (ICSOFT) (pp. 284–294)

  • Khemiri R, Elbedoui-Maktouf K, Grabot B, Zouari B (2017a) Integrating fuzzy TOPSIS and goal programming for multiple objective integrated procurement-production planning. In: 2017b 22nd IEEE International conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA) 2017b Sep 12 (pp. 1–8). IEEE

  • Kilic HS, Yalcin AS (2020) Modified two-phase fuzzy goal programming integrated with IF-TOPSIS for green supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 93:106371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi H, Gerla M (1983) Optimal routing in closed queueing networks. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 13(2):26–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger R, Rashidi TH, Rose JM (2016) Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part c Emerg Technol 69:343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Sah B, Singh AR, Deng Y, He X, Kumar P, Bansal RC (2017) A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:596–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Aswin A, Gupta H (2020) Evaluating green performance of the airports using hybrid BWM and VIKOR methodology. Tour Manag 1(76):103941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahri V, Shaw K, Ishizaka A (2021) Sustainable supply chain network design problem: using the integrated BWM, TOPSIS, possibilistic programming, and ε-constrained methods. Expert Syst Appl 168:114373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai YJ, Hwang CL (1994) Fuzzy multiple objective decision making-methods and applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer, Berlin

  • Lai YJ, Hwang CL (1992) A new approach to some possibilistic linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49(2):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lak Kamari M, Isvand H, Alhuyi Nazari M (2020) Applications of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in renewable energy development: a review. Renew Energy Res Appl 1(1):47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin MW, Kockelman KM, Boyles SD, Li T (2017) A general framework for modeling shared autonomous vehicles with dynamic network-loading and dynamic ride-sharing application. Comput Environ Urban Syst 64:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang TF (2006) Distribution planning decisions using interactive fuzzy multi-objective linear programming. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157(10):1303–1316

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, Quan MY, Shi H, Guo C (2019) An integrated MCDM method for robot selection under interval-valued pythagorean uncertain linguistic environment. Int J Intell Syst 34(2):188–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Ruan D (2007) Multi-objective group decision making: methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques. Imperial College Press

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Luhandjula MK (1989) Fuzzy optimization: an appraisal. Fuzzy Sets Syst 30(3):257–282

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Malik M, Gupta SK (2020) Goal programming technique for solving fully interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple objective transportation problems. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04770-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mansory A, Nasiri A, Mohammadi N (2021) Proposing an integrated model for evaluation of green and resilient suppliers by path analysis, SWARA and TOPSIS. J Appl Res Ind Eng 8(2):129–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghdani R, Sana SS, Shahbandarzadeh H (2020) Multi-item fuzzy economic production quantity model with multiple deliveries. Soft Comput 24(14):10363–10387

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed A (2020) Towards a sustainable assessment of suppliers: an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-possibilistic multi-objective approach. Ann Oper Res 293(2):639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed A, Harris I, Soroka A, Nujoom R (2019) A hybrid MCDM-fuzzy multi-objective programming approach for a G-resilient supply chain network design. Comput Ind Eng 127:297–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mula J, Poler R, Garcia-Sabater JP (2007) Material Requirement Planning with fuzzy constraints and fuzzy coefficients. Fuzzy Sets Syst 158(7):783–793

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nassereddine M, Eskandari H (2017) An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran. Transp Res Part a Policy Pract 106:427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemati Y, Alavidoost MH (2019) A fuzzy bi-objective MILP approach to integrate sales, production, distribution and procurement planning in a FMCG supply chain. Soft Comput 23(13):4871–4890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong MC, Leong YT, Wan YK, Chew IML (2021) Multi-objective optimization of integrated water system by FUCOM-VIKOR approach. Process Integr Optim Sustain 5(1):43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega J, Hamadneh J, Esztergár-Kiss D, Tóth J (2020) Simulation of the daily activity plans of travelers using the park-and-ride system and autonomous vehicles: work and shopping trip purposes. Appl Sci 10(8):2912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamučar D, Stević Ž, Sremac S (2018) A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in mcdm models: Full consistency method (fucom). Symmetry 10(9):393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamučar D, Puška A, Stević Ž, Ćirović G (2021) A new intelligent MCDM model for HCW management: the integrated BWM–MABAC model based on D numbers. Expert Syst Appl 175:114862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pati RK, Vrat P, Kumar P (2008) A goal programming model for paper recycling system. Omega 36(3):405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic I, Kankaras M (2020) A hybridized IT2FS-DEMATEL-AHP-TOPSIS multicriteria decision making approach: Case study of selection and evaluation of criteria for determination of air traffic control radar position. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 3(1):146–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popović V, Pamučar D, Stević Ž, Lukovac V, Jovković S (2022) Multicriteria optimization of logistics processes using a grey FUCOM-SWOT model. Symmetry 14(4):794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulhès A, Berrada J (2020) Single vehicle network versus dispatcher: user assignment in an agent-based model. Transp Transp Sci 16(2):270–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero C (2004) A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model. Eur J Oper Res 153(3):675–686

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi F, Zhang R, Hindy Y, Pavone M (2018) Routing autonomous vehicles in congested transportation networks: structural properties and coordination algorithms. Auton Robot 42(7):1427–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roszkowaska E (2013) Rank ordering criteria weighting methods-a comparative overview. Optim Studia Ekonomiczne 5(65):15–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouyendegh BD, Yildizbasi A, Üstünyer P (2020) Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem. Soft Comput 24(3):2215–2228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy T, Dutta RK (2019) Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for multi-objective optimization of electro discharge machining process. Soft Comput 23(13):5053–5063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting. Resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty RW (1987) The analytic hierarchy process: what it is and how it is used. Math Model 9(3–5):161–176

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) The analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2001) Fundamentals of the analytic hierarchy process. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza GA, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A, Roy R (2021) An integrated approach to identify suitable areas for built-up development using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis and AHP in Siliguri planning area. India SN Appl Sci 3(4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa M, Yano H (1989) An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for multiobjective nonlinear programming problems with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst 30(3):221–238

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar M, Lanzetti N, Rossi F, Schiffer M, Pavone M (2019a) Intermodal autonomous mobility-on-demand. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 21:3946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar M, Rossi F, Schiffer M, Onder CH, Pavone M (2018) On the interaction between autonomous mobility-on-demand and public transportation systems. In: 2018 21st international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC) 2018 Nov 4 (pp. 2262–2269). IEEE

  • Salazar M, Tsao M, Aguiar I, Schiffer M, Pavone M (2019b) CARA: a congestion-aware routing algorithm for autonomous 1 mobility-on-demand systems 2. In: Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2019b

  • Sanz D, Valente J, del Cerro J, Colorado J, Barrientos A (2015) Safe operation of mini UAVs: a review of regulation and best practices. Adv Robot 29(19):1221–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaygan A, Testik ÖM (2019) A fuzzy AHP-based methodology for project prioritization and selection. Soft Comput 23(4):1309–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simic V, Gokasar I, Deveci M, Karakurt A (2021) An integrated CRITIC and MABAC based Type-2 neutrosophic model for public transportation pricing system selection. Socio-Econ Plann Sci 80:101157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirbiladze G (2021) New view of fuzzy aggregations: part i: general information structure for decision-making models title. J Fuzzy Extens Appl 2(2):130–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Stević Ž, Pamučar D, Puška A, Chatterjee P (2020) Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Comput Ind Eng 1(140):106231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H, Asai K (1984) Fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 13(1):1

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Telpaz A, Baltaxe M, Hecht RM, Cohen-Lazry G, Degani A, Kamhi G (2018) An approach for measurement of passenger comfort: real-time classification based on in-cabin and exterior data. In: 2018 21st international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC) 2018 Nov 4 (pp. 223–229). IEEE

  • Torabi SA, Hassini E (2009) Multi-site production planning integrating procurement and distribution plans in multi-echelon supply chains: an interactive fuzzy goal programming approach. Int J Prod Res 47(19):5475–5499

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Torkayesh AE, Pamucar D, Ecer F, Chatterjee P (2021) An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe. Socioecon Plann Sci 78:101052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornado Mobility- Fui Project https://www.tornado-mobility.com/index.php/en/home-2/. Accessed 11 April 2020

  • Tosarkani BM, Amin SH (2018) A possibilistic solution to configure a battery closed-loop supply chain: multi-objective approach. Expert Syst Appl 92:12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosarkani BM, Amin SH, Zolfagharinia H (2020) A scenario-based robust possibilistic model for a multi-objective electronic reverse logistics network. Int J Prod Econ 224:107557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsao M, Iglesias R, Pavone M (2018) Stochastic model predictive control for autonomous mobility on demand. In: 2018 21st International conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC) 2018 Nov 4 (pp. 3941–3948). IEEE

  • Tsao M, Milojevic D, Ruch C, Salazar M, Frazzoli E, Pavone M (2019) Model predictive control of ride-sharing autonomous mobility-on-demand systems. In: 2019 International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) 2019 May 20 (pp. 6665–6671). IEEE

  • Tsao YC, Thanh VV (2019) A multi-objective mixed robust possibilistic flexible programming approach for sustainable seaport-dry port network design under an uncertain environment. Transp Res Part e Log Transp Rev 124:13–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulutaş A, Stanujkic D, Karabasevic D, Popovic G, Zavadskas EK, Smarandache F, Brauers WK (2021) Developing of a novel integrated MCDM MULTIMOOSRAL approach for supplier selection. Informatica 32(1):145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahidnia MH, Alesheikh A, Alimohammadi A, Bassiri A (2008) Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process in GIS application. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 37(B2):593–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Voskoglou M (2020) Assessment and linear programming under fuzzy conditions. J Fuzzy Extens Appl 3:189–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang RC, Liang TF (2005) Applying possibilistic linear programming to aggregate production planning. Int J Prod Econ 98(3):328–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Shu YF (2007) A possibilistic decision model for new product supply chain design. Eur J Oper Res 177(2):1044–1061

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Luo Y, Hua Z (2008) On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. Eur J Oper Res 186(2):735–747

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wollenstein-Betech S, Salazar M, Houshmand A, Pavone M, Paschalidis IC, Cassandras CG (2021) Routing and rebalancing intermodal autonomous mobility-on-demand systems in mixed traffic. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3112106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollenstein-Betech S, Paschalidis I.C, Cassandras C.G (2020) Joint pricing and rebalancing of autonomous mobility-on-demand systems. In: 59th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC) pp. 2573–2578

  • Wu H, Yue Q, Guo P, Pan Q, Guo S (2021) Sustainable regional water allocation under water-energy nexus: a chance-constrained possibilistic mean-variance multi-objective programming. J Clean Prod 313:127934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yucesan M, Gul M (2020) Hospital service quality evaluation: an integrated model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Soft Comput 24(5):3237–3255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning: II. Inf Sci 8(4):301–357

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):3–28

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Pavone M (2016) Control of robotic mobility-on-demand systems: a queueing-theoretical perspective. Int J Robot Res 35(1–3):186–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XY, Zhang HY, Wang JQ (2019) Discussing incomplete 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic preference relations in multi-granular linguistic MCGDM with unknown weight information. Soft Comput 23(6):2015–2032

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Jianming Z, Yiyu Y (2020) Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on CVPIFRS models: an application to biomedical problems. Inf Sci 517:315–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Rossi F, Pavone M (2016) Model predictive control of autonomous mobility-on-demand systems. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) 2016 16 (pp. 1382–1389). IEEE

  • Zimmermann HJ (2011) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižović M, Pamucar D (2019) New model for determining criteria weights: level based weight assessment (LBWA) model. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 2(2):126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoto J, La RJ, Hamedi M, Haghani A (2012) Estimation of average vehicle speeds traveling on heterogeneous lanes using Bluetooth sensors. In: 2012 IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall) 2012 Sep 3 (pp. 1–5). IEEE

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is financed by national funds FUI 23 under the French TORNADO project focused on the interactions between autonomous vehicles and infrastructures for mobility services in low-density areas. Further details of the project are available at https://www.tornado-mobility.com/.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universite de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, E2S UPPA, LIUPPA, EA3000, 64600, Anglet, France

    Rihab Khemiri, Mohamed Naija & Ernesto Exposito

Authors
  1. Rihab Khemiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed Naija
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ernesto Exposito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rihab Khemiri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors acknowledged that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Hemen Dutta.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khemiri, R., Naija, M. & Exposito, E. Dispatching and rebalancing for ride-sharing autonomous mobility-on-demand systems based on a fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Soft Comput 27, 2041–2069 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07377-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07377-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation