Skip to main content
Log in

Mixing of capacity preserving dynamical systems

  • Fuzzy systems and their mathematics
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to probe the transformations that preserve capacities, their ergodicity and mixing behaviors. Firstly, definitions of different levels of mixing and ergodicity are introduced. Then attention is paid to continuous transformations on topological spaces with invariant capacities on Borel \(\sigma \)-algebra. The main results include that strong mixing implies ergodicity and weak mixing implies weak ergodicity. Moreover, limit properties of mixing capacity preserving dynamical systems and connections between a capacity preserving dynamical system and its product system are also discussed. The novelty of this study is that we present several topological characterizations of ergodic and mixing capacity preserving dynamical systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

  • Ali Shah R, Asghar Z, Ali N (2022) Mathematical modeling related to bacterial gliding mechanism at low Reynolds number with Ellis Slime. Eur Phys J Plus 13:137:600

    Google Scholar 

  • Asghar Z, Waqas M et al (2020) Locomotion of an efficient biomechanical sperm through viscoelastic medium. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19:2271–2284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asghar Z, Ali N (2021) Dynamical interaction effects on soft-bodied organisms in a multi-sinusoidal passage. Eur Phys J Plus 136:693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerreia-Vioglio S, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2016) Ergodic theorems for lower probabilities. Proc Amer Math Soc 144:3381–3396

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Choquet G (1954) Theory of capacities. Ann Inst Fourier Grenoble 5:131–295

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Denneberg D(1994) Non-additive measure and integral. Theory and decision library. Series B: mathematical and statistical methods 27. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht. (1994)

  • Feng CR, Wu PY, Zhao HZ (2020) Ergodicity of invariant capacities. Stoch Proc Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2020.02.010

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I (1987) Expected utility theory with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J Math Econ 16:65-68

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I (2004) Uncertainty in economic theory: essays in honor of David Schmeidler’s 65th birthday. Routledge, New York, Routledge Frontiers of Political Economy, p 63

  • Gu LJ, Li ZM Metric entropy of capacity preserving dynamical systems. Fuzzy Set Syst

  • Huber PJ (1973) The use of Choquet capacities in statistics. Bull Inst Int Stat 45:181–191

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kakutani S (1973) Examples of ergodic measure preserving transformations which are weakly mixing but not strongly mixing. In: Beck A (ed) Recent advances in topological dynamics. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan M, Asghar Z (2018) A novel construction of substitution box for image encryption applications with Gingerbreadman chaotic map and \(S_{8}\) permutation. Neural Comput Appl 29(4):993–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BD (2007) Uncertainty theory. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BD (2010) Uncertainty theory: a branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2005) A strong law of large number for capacities. Ann Probab 33:1171–1178

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marinacci M (1999) Limit laws for non-additive probabilities and their frequentist interpretation. J Econom Theory 84:145–195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marinacci M, Montrucchio L (2004) Introduction to the mathematics of ambiguity. In: Gilboa I. (ed) Uncertainty in economic theory: essays in Honor of David Schmeidler’s 65th Birthday. Routledge: New York. pp. 46-107

  • Peng SG(2010) Nonlinear expectations and stochastic calculus under uncertainty-with robust central limit theorem and G-Brownian motion. Available at arXiv:1002.4546v1

  • Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57:571–587

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Terán P (2014) Laws of large numbers without additivity. Trans Amer Math Soc 366:5431–5451

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wakker P (2004) Testing and characterizing properties of nonadditive measures through violations of the sure-thing principle. Econometrica 69:1039–1059

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Walley P (1991) Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Walters P (1982) An introduction to ergodic theory. Graduate texts in mathematics 79, Springer-Verlag: New York-Berlin

  • Wang ZY, Klir GJ (2008) Generalized measure theory, vol 25. IFSR international series on systems science and engineering. Springer, New York-Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZY, Klir GJ (1992) Fuzzy measure theory. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu HY, Li ZM (2022) Ergodic theorems for capacity preserving \({\mathbb{Z} }_+^d\)-actions. Int J Approx Reason 146:1–20

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Ke H (2014) Poinc\(\acute{a}\) recurrence theorem in regular uncertain dynamic system. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 13:319–328

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This second author is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12271432) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2020JC-39).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LG was responsible for conceptualization and writing the original draft. GW polished the language and edited the manuscript, ZL took part in supervision, and writing, reviewing and editing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiming Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, L., Wei, G. & Li, Z. Mixing of capacity preserving dynamical systems. Soft Comput 27, 219–225 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07576-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07576-w

Keywords

Navigation