Abstract
In this dynamic environment with unexpected changes and high market rivalry, supply chains focus more on executing responsive strategies with minimum costs. This research paper aims to identify the crucial enablers of responsiveness of the Indian automotive supply chain. Seventeen enablers were identified from the extensive literature and expert interview for supply chain responsiveness and an integrated methodology of Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) using Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS is applied for modelling and prioritising the enablers. The proposed model revealed the most crucial responsiveness enablers for the supply chain. The top three significant causal enablers derived from Fuzzy DEMATEL are Commitment of management and Strategy decision making, Demand forecasting and Continuous improvement. The Fuzzy AHP–Fuzzy TOPSIS result imply that automotive manufacturer should pay close attention towards Commitment of management and Strategy decision making, Waiting period for vehicle's delivery and Demand forecasting. The proposed framework suggests strategic goals to guide different supply chain members and automotive industry decision-makers towards improved supply chain responsiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.
References
Ahmed W, Huma S (2021) Impact of lean and agile strategies on supply chain risk management. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 32:33–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1529558
Amin F, Fahmi A, Abdullah S (2019) Dealer using a new trapezoidal cubic hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS method and application to group decision-making program. Soft Comput 23:5353–5366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3476-3
Araceli R-G-B, Javier L-MF, Perez N-AM, Mark S (2020) Ambidextrous supply chain strategy and supply chain flexibility: the contingent effect of ISO 9001. Ind Manag Data Syst 120:1691–1714. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2020-0038
Arasteh A (2020) Supply chain management under uncertainty with the combination of fuzzy multi-objective planning and real options approaches. Soft Comput 24:5177–5198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04271-1
Arpit S, Misra CS, Vinod K, Uma K (2021) Identification and ordering of safety performance indicators using fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study in Indian construction company. Int J Qual Reliab Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2020-0051
Arshinder KA, Deshmukh SG (2008) Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. Int J Prod Econ 115:316–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.011
Bacudio LR, Benjamin MFD, Eusebio RCP et al (2016) Analyzing barriers to implementing industrial symbiosis networks using DEMATEL. Sustain Prod Consum 7:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.03.001
Beikkhakhian Y, Javanmardi M, Karbasian M, Khayambashi B (2015) The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods. Expert Syst Appl 42:6224–6236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.035
Bhattacharya S (2014) Supply chain management in indian automotive industry: complexities, challenges and way ahead. Int J Manag Value Supply Chain 5:49–62. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2014.5206
Birasnav M, Bienstock J (2019) Supply chain integration, advanced manufacturing technology, and strategic leadership: an empirical study. Comput Ind Eng 130:142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.021
Byoungho J (2004) Achieving an optimal global versus domestic sourcing balance under demand uncertainty. Int J Oper Prod Manag 24:1292–1305. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410569056
Caiado RGG, Scavarda LF, Gavião LO et al (2021) A fuzzy rule-based industry 4.0 maturity model for operations and supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 231:107883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107883
Çalık A (2020) A novel pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the Industry 4.0 era. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05294-9
Chandak A (2019) Analysis of the impact of supply chain flexibility on supply chain performance: an empirical study in the indian automotive industry. Ind Eng J 12:1–16. https://doi.org/10.26488/iej.12.3.1165
Chang T, Hsiao W (2011) Consumers’ automotive purchase decisions: the significance of vehicle-based infotainment systems. Afr J Bus Manag 5:4152–4163. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM10.480
Chang B, Chang C-W, Wu C-H (2011) Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Syst Appl 38:1850–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2010.07.114
Chen YS, Chuang HM, Sangaiah AK et al (2019) A study for project risk management using an advanced MCDM-based DEMATEL-ANP approach. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10:2669–2681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0973-2
Colwell SR, Joshi AW (2013) Corporate ecological responsiveness: antecedent effects of institutional pressure and top management commitment and their impact on organizational performance. Bus Strateg Environ 22:73–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.732
David A, Banumathi M (2018) Factors influencing the purchase decision of passenger cars in puduchery. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2986661
Digalwar A, Raut RD, Yadav VS et al (2020) Evaluation of critical constructs for measurement of sustainable supply chain practices in lean-agile firms of Indian origin: a hybrid ISM-ANP approach. Bus Strateg Environ. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2455
Disney SM, Towill DR (2003) Vendor-managed inventory and bullwhip reduction in a two-level supply chain. Int J Oper Prod Manag 23:625–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310476654
Donegan HA, Dodd FJ (1991) A note on saaty’s random indexes. Math Comput Model 15:135–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(91)90098-R
Dubey R, Luo Z, Gunasekaran A et al (2018) Big data and predictive analytics in humanitarian supply chains: enabling visibility and coordination in the presence of swift trust. Int J Logist Manag 29:485–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2017-0039
Faisal MN, Banwet DK, Shankar R (2006) Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers. Bus Process Manag J 12:535–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610678113
Fatorachian H, Kazemi H (2021) Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance. Prod Plan Control 32:63–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1712487
Feizabadi J (2020) Machine learning demand forecasting and supply chain performance. Int J Logist Res Appl. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1803246
Francesca M (2008) Internet and supply chain management: adoption modalities for Italian firms. Manag Res News 31:359–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170810865163
Gedam VV, Raut RD, Priyadarshinee P et al (2021) Analysing the adoption barriers for sustainability in the Indian power sector by DEMATEL approach. Int J Sustain Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1874072
Gopal PRC, Thakkar J (2016) Sustainable supply chain practices: an empirical investigation on Indian automobile industry. Prod Plan Control 27:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1060368
Griffiths J, Margetts D (2000) Variation in production schedules — implications for both the company and its suppliers. J Mater Process Technol 103:155–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00408-8
Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT (2005) Build-to-order supply chain management: a literature review and framework for development. J Oper Manag 23:423–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.10.005
Gunasekaran A, Lai KH, Edwin-Cheng TC (2008) Responsive supply chain: a competitive strategy in a networked economy. Omega 36:549–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.12.002
Gupta V, Syed AA, Chaturvedi M (2017) A study on the purchase behaviour of customers of hatchback cars in Delhi/NCR region. Pac Bus Rev Int 9:7–16
Gupta S, Huddar N, Iyer B (2018) The future of the automobile industry in India | McKinsey
Han Y, Deng Y (2018) An enhanced fuzzy evidential DEMATEL method with its application to identify critical success factors. Soft Comput 22:5073–5090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3311-x
Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2009) An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Prod Oper Manag. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x
Holweg M (2005a) The three dimensions of responsiveness. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25:603–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510605063
Holweg M (2005b) An investigation into supplier responsiveness: empirical evidence from the automotive industry. Int J Logist Manag 16:96–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090510617376
Hsieh T-Y, Lu S-T, Tzeng G-H (2004) Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. Int J Proj Manag 22:573–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.002
India Brand Equity Foundation (2019) Indian automobile industry report-July 2019
Jain N, Singh AR, Upadhyay RK (2020) Sustainable supplier selection under attractive criteria through FIS and integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques. Int J Sustain Eng 13:441–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1737751
Jesus RM, Eliany RI, Edgar R, Stefano PA (2020) The value of supply chain integration in the latin American agri-food industry: trust, commitment and performance outcomes. Int J Logist Manag 32:281–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2020-0097
Kannabiran G, Bhaumik S (2005) Corporate turnaround through effective supply chain management: The case of a leading jewellery manufacturer in India. Supply Chain Manag Int J 10:340–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540510624160
Kannan G, Pokharel S, Kumar PS (2009) A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.06.004
Kaur J, Sidhu R, Awasthi A et al (2018) A DEMATEL based approach for investigating barriers in green supply chain management in Canadian manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Res 56:312–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1395522
Khompatraporn C, Somboonwiwat T (2017) Causal factor relations of supply chain competitiveness via fuzzy DEMATEL method for thai automotive industry. Prod Plan Control 28:538–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1309713
Kim M, Suresh NC, Kocabasoglu-Hillmer C (2013) An impact of manufacturing flexibility and technological dimensions of manufacturing strategy on improving supply chain responsiveness: business environment perspective. Int J Prod Res 51:5597–5611. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.790569
Krajewski L, Wei JC, Tang L-L (2005) Responding to schedule changes in build-to-order supply chains. J Oper Manag 23:452–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.10.006
Kritchanchai D, MacCarthy BL (1999) Responsiveness of the order fulfilment process. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19:812–833. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910274419
Kumar R, Singh RK, Shankar R (2014) Strategy development by Indian SMEs for improving coordination in supply chain an empirical study. Compet Rev 24:414–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-2012-0016
Lee SK, Mogi G, Hui KS (2013) A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)/data envelopment analysis (DEA) hybrid model for efficiently allocating energy R&D resources: In the case of energy technologies against high oil prices. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.067
Lu D, Fan X, Cao P (2019) Achieving responsiveness through supply chain integration: a moderating effect of industry-4.0. J Bus Adm Res 2:20–32. https://doi.org/10.30564/jbar.v2i4.1186
Lyu HM, Sun WJ, Shen SL, Zhou AN (2020) Risk assessment using a new consulting process in Fuzzy AHP. J Constr Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001757
Mahmoudi S, Jalali A, Ahmadi M et al (2019) Identifying critical success factors in heart failure self-care using fuzzy DEMATEL method. Appl Soft Comput J 84:105729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105729
Marek P (2008) A local collaboration as the most successful co-ordination scenario in the supply chain. Ind Manag Data Syst 108:22–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810844061
Martinelli EM, Tunisini A (2019) Customer integration into supply chains: literature review and research propositions. J Bus Ind Mark 34:24–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2017-0162
Mehrjerdi YZ (2009) Excellent supply chain management. Assem Autom 29:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150910929866
Menon B (2018) A study on consumer behaviour of passenger car segments through logistic egression modelling. Metamorph A J Manag Res 16:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972622517706876
Mentes A, Akyildiz H, Yetkin M, Turkoglu N (2015) A FSA based fuzzy DEMATEL approach for risk assessment of cargo ships at coasts and open seas of Turkey. Saf Sci 79:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.05.004
Mirzamohammadi S, Karimi S, Pishvaee MS (2019) A novel cost allocation method applying fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2019-0513
Mohammaddust F, Rezapour S, Farahani RZ et al (2017) Developing lean and responsive supply chains: a robust model for alternative risk mitigation strategies in supply chain designs. Int J Prod Econ 183:632–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.012
Mohammadfam I, Mirzaei Aliabadi M, Soltanian AR et al (2019) Investigating interactions among vital variables affecting situation awareness based on fuzzy DEMATEL method. Int J Ind Ergon 74:102842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102842
Moktadir MA, Ali SM, Paul SK, Shukla N (2018) Barriers to big data analytics in manufacturing supply chains: a case study from Bangladesh. Comput Ind Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.013
Moyano-Fuentes J, Sacristán-Díaz M, Garrido-Vega P (2016) Improving supply chain responsiveness through advanced manufacturing technology: the mediating role of internal and external integration. Prod Plan Control 27:686–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2016.1166277
Nilashi M, Samad S, Manaf AA et al (2019) Factors influencing medical tourism adoption in Malaysia: a DEMATEL-fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Comput Ind Eng 137:106005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106005
Nooraie V, Fathi M, Narenji M et al (2019) A multi-objective model for risk mitigating in supply chain design. Int J Prod Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1633024
Ocampo LA (2019) Applying fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS technique in identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing for food production. Environ Dev Sustain 21:2225–2251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0129-8
Opricovic S, Tzeng G-H (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156:445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Öztürk C, Yildizbaşi A (2020) Barriers to implementation of blockchain into supply chain management using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method: a numerical example. Soft Comput 24:14771–14789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04831-w
Pandey M, Litoriya R, Pandey P (2019) Application of fuzzy DEMATEL approach in analyzing mobile app issues. Program Comput Softw 45:268–287. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0361768819050050
Pilevar AR, Matinfar HR, Sohrabi A, Sarmadian F (2020) Integrated fuzzy, AHP and GIS techniques for land suitability assessment in semi-arid regions for wheat and maize farming. Ecol Indic 110:105887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105887
Power DJ, Sohal AS, Rahman SU (2001) Critical success factors in agile supply chain management an empirical study. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 31:247–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030110394923
Prajogo D, Olhager J (2012) Supply chain integration and performance: the effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. Int J Prod Econ 135:514–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.001
Quezada LE, López-Ospina HA, Palominos PI, Oddershede AM (2018) Identifying causal relationships in strategy maps using ANP and DEMATEL. Comput Ind Eng 118:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.02.020
Rajak M, Shaw K (2019) Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Technol Soc 59:101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101186
Rajak S, Parthiban P, Dhanalakshmi R (2016) Sustainable transportation systems performance evaluation using fuzzy logic. Ecol Indic 71:503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2016.07.031
Ravel-Shruti J, Ravi K, Ravi S (2021) Analyzing the critical success factors influencing lean six sigma implementation: fuzzy DEMATEL approach. J Model Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-07-2019-0155
Reichhart A, Holweg M (2007) Creating the customer-responsive supply chain: a reconciliation of concepts. Int J Oper Prod Manag 27:1144–1172. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710830575
Roh J, Hong P, Min H (2014) Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: the case of manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ 147:198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.013
Rubio-Aliaga A, García-Cascales MS, Sánchez-Lozano JM, Molina-Garcia A (2021) MCDM-based multidimensional approach for selection of optimal groundwater pumping systems: Design and case example. Renew Energy 163:213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.079
Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Sahay BS (2003) Understanding trust in supply chain relationships. Ind Manag Data Syst 103:553–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570310497602
Salimian H, Rashidirad M, Soltani E (2020) Supplier quality management and performance: the effect of supply chain oriented culture. Prod Plan Control. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1777478
Seker S, Zavadskas EK (2017) Application of fuzzy DEMATEL method for analyzing occupational risks on construction sites. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112083
Singh RK (2013) Prioritizing the factors for coordinated supply chain using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Meas Bus Excell 17:80–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041311311383
Singh RK (2015) Modelling of critical factors for responsiveness in supply chain. J Manuf Technol Manag 26:868–888. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2014-0042
Singh RK, Sharma MK (2014a) Selecting competitive supply chain using fuzzy AHP and extent analysis. J Ind Prod Eng 31:524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2014.999723
Singh RK, Sharma MK (2014b) Prioritising the alternatives for flexibility in supply chains. Prod Plan Control 25:176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2013.782951
Singh RK, Gunasekaran A, Kumar P (2018) Third party logistics (3PL) selection for cold chain management: a fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Ann Oper Res 267:531–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2591-3
Storey J, Emberson C, Reade D (2005) The barriers to customer responsive supply chain management. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25:242–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510581853
Story WK, Deitz GD, Richey RG (2021) Influence of supply chain technology responsiveness on supply chain and market performance. J Mark Theory Pract 00:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2021.1872388
Sun CC (2010) A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37:7745–7754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066
Syntetos AA, Boylan JE, Disney SM (2009) Forecasting for inventory planning: a 50-year review. J Oper Res Soc 60:S149–S160. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2008.173
Tejpal G, Garg RK, Sachdeva A (2013) Trust among supply chain partners: a review. Meas Bus Excell 17:51–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041311311365
Tigga GA, Kannabiran G, Arumugam V (2021) Exploring relationships among IT advancement, IT assimilation, supply chain capabilities and supply chain performance. J Decis Syst. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.1873022
Tirkolaee EB, Mardani A, Dashtian Z et al (2020) A novel hybrid method using fuzzy decision making and multi-objective programming for sustainable-reliable supplier selection in two-echelon supply chain design. J Clean Prod 250:119517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119517
Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res Policy 24:419–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3
Vanalle RM, Lucato WC, Ganga GMD, Alves Filho AG (2019) Risk management in the automotive supply chain: an exploratory study in Brazil. Int J Prod Res 58:783–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1600762
Vardopoulos I (2019) Critical sustainable development factors in the adaptive reuse of urban industrial buildings, a fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Sustain Cities Soc 50:101684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101684
Vinodh S, Sai Balagi TS, Patil A (2016) A hybrid MCDM approach for agile concept selection using fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:1979–1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7718-6
Wang B, Song J, Ren J et al (2019) Selecting sustainable energy conversion technologies for agricultural residues: a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based prioritization from life cycle perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl 142:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.011
Wu W-W, Lee Y-T (2007) Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst Appl 32:499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005
Xu C, Wu Y, Dai S (2020) What are the critical barriers to the development of hydrogen refueling stations in China? A modified fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Energy Policy 142:111495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111495
Yazdani M, Wang ZX, Chan FTS (2020) A decision support model based on the combined structure of DEMATEL, QFD and fuzzy values. Soft Comput 24:12449–12468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04685-2
Ye F, Xu X (2010) Cost allocation model for optimizing supply chain inventory with controllable lead time. Comput Ind Eng 59:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.03.003
Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Kildienė S (2014) State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20:165–179. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037
Zhao G, Zhuang G, Sun W et al (2021) Asynchronous filtering for delayed Fuzzy jump systems subject to mixed passivity and H∞ performance. Int J Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-01025-2
Zhong RY, Newman ST, Huang GQ, Lan S (2016) Big Data for supply chain management in the service and manufacturing sectors: challenges, opportunities, and future perspectives. Comput Ind Eng 101:572–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.07.013
Zhuang G, Sun W, Su S-F, Xia J (2020a) Asynchronous feedback control for delayed fuzzy degenerate jump systems under observer-based event-driven characteristic. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3027336
Zhuang G, Xia J, Feng J et al (2020b) Admissibilization for implicit jump systems with mixed retarded delays based on reciprocally convex integral inequality and Barbalat’s Lemma. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2020.2964057
Zhuang G, Su S-F, Xia J, Sun W (2021) HMM-based asynchronous H∞ filtering for fuzzy singular markovian switching systems with retarded time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Cybern 51:1189–1203. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.2977127
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organisation for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript, Rinu Sathyan, Dr. P. Parthiban, Dr. R. Dhanalakshmi, Sachin M. S.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sathyan, R., Parthiban, P., Dhanalakshmi, R. et al. An integrated Fuzzy MCDM approach for modelling and prioritising the enablers of responsiveness in automotive supply chain using Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Soft Comput 27, 257–277 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07591-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07591-x