Abstract
Maintenance strategy selection is an important step in maintenance management, which is the basis for implementing maintenance optimization and formulating specific maintenance schemes. This paper takes the meta-action unit (MU) as the research object, considers the randomness and fuzziness of expert evaluation and the interaction between evaluation criteria in the selection process of maintenance strategy, and proposes a maintenance strategy selection method based on cloud DEMATEL-ANP. Firstly, DEMATEL based on cloud model is used to establish the interaction model between the main criteria, determine the weighted cloud weight of the super matrix and the inner dependencies of the sub-criteria under the same main criteria. Then, the cloud-ANP model is used to determine the outer dependencies relationship and construct the cloud super matrix, so as to obtain the cloud weight of each evaluation criteria in maintenance strategy selection. By using the subjective and objective weighting method, the evaluation of different experts on different maintenance strategy criteria is integrated, and the priority of alternative maintenance strategies of MU is obtained. Finally, different methods are used to sort and compare the alternative maintenance strategies of the rotating body rotation MU of the CNC turntable, which verifies the scientificity and effectiveness of the maintenance strategy selection method based on cloud DEMATEL-ANP are verified.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
References
Aghaee M, Fazli S (2012) An improved MCDM method for maintenance approach selection: a case study of auto industry. Manag Sci Lett 2:137–146. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2011.09.012
Animah I, Shafiee M (2021) Maintenance strategy selection for critical shipboard machinery systems using a hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE and cost benefit analysis: a case study. J Mar Eng Technol 20:312–323
Arjomandi MA, Dinmohammadi F, Mosallanezhad B, Shafiee M (2021) A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP-VIKOR analytical model for maintenance strategy selection of safety critical assets. Adv Mech Eng 13:1–21
Labib AW (1998) World-class maintenance using a computerised maintenance management system. J Qual Maint Eng 4:66–75
Asuquo MP, Wang J, Zhang L, Phylip-Jones G (2019) Application of a multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) model for selecting appropriate maintenance strategy for marine and offshore machinery operations. Ocean Eng 179:246–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.065
Avakh Darestani S, Palizban T, Imannezhad R (2022) Maintenance strategy selection: a combined goal programming approach and BWM-TOPSIS for paper production industry. J Qual Maint Eng 28:14–36
Bevilacqua M, Braglia M, Gabbrielli R (2000) Monte Carlo simulation approach for a modified FMECA in a power plant. Qual Reliab Eng Int 16:313–324
Büyüközkan G, Güleryüz S (2016) An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey. Int J Prod Econ 182:435–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.015
Carpitella S, Mzougui I, Benítez J et al (2021) A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: the case of a marine salt manufacture firm. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 205:107265
Chan FTS, Prakash A (2012) Maintenance policy selection in manufacturing firms using the fuzzy MCDM approach. Int J Prod Res 50:7044–7056. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.653451
Ding S-H, Kamaruddin S, Azid IA (2014a) Development of a model for optimal maintenance policy selection. Eur J Ind Eng 8:50–68
Ding SH, Goh TT, Tan PS et al (2012) Implementation of decision tree for maintenance policy decision making-a case study in semiconductor industry. Adv Mater Res 591–593:704–707
Ding SH, Kamaruddin S (2015) Maintenance policy optimization—literature review and directions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:1263–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6341-2
Ding SH, Kamaruddin S, Azid IA (2014b) Maintenance policy selection model-a case study in the palm oil industry. J Manuf Technol Manag 25:415–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2012-0032
Emovon I, Norman RA, Murphy AJ (2018) Hybrid MCDM based methodology for selecting the optimum maintenance strategy for ship machinery systems. J Intell Manuf 29:519–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1133-6
Fathi MR, Momeni M, Zarchi MK, Azizollahi S (2011) A fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach to maintenance strategy selection: a case study. Middle-East J Sci Res 8:699–706
Fernandez O, Labib A, Walmsley R, Petty D (2003) A decision support maintenance management system. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20:965–979
Gao H, Ju Y, Gonzalez EDRS et al (2021) Identifying critical causal criteria of green supplier evaluation using heterogeneous judgements: an integrated approach based on cloud model and DEMATEL. Appl Soft Comput 113:107882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107882
Ge Y, Xiao M, Yang Z et al (2017) An integrated logarithmic fuzzy preference programming based methodology for optimum maintenance strategies selection. Appl Soft Comput 60:591–601
Gedikli T, Ervural BC (2023) Evaluation of maintenance policies using a two-stage pythagorean-based group decision-making approach. Int J Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01476-3
Gholami J, Razavi A, Ghaffarpour R (2022) Decision-making regarding the best maintenance strategy for electrical equipment of buildings based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; case study: elevator. J Qual Maint Eng 28:653–668. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-03-2020-0015
Gölcük I, Baykasoʇlu A (2016) An analysis of DEMATEL approaches for criteria interaction handling within ANP. Expert Syst Appl 46:346–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.041
Goossens AJM, Basten RJI (2015) Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy process; an application for naval ships. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 142:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.014
Grinstead CM, Snell JL (2006) Introduction to probability. American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island
Gupta S, Maiti J, Kumar R, Kumar U (2009) A control chart guided maintenance policy selection. Int J Mining, Reclam Environ 23:216–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930902916478
Hasheminezhad A, Hadadi F, Shirmohammadi H (2021) Investigation and prioritization of risk factors in the collision of two passenger trains based on fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy DEMATEL methods. Soft Comput 25:4677–4697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05478-3
Hayati J, Abdollahzadeh S (2021) An integrated simulation and virtual cellular manufacturing system concept approach for maintenance policy selection. Math Probl Eng 2021:1306742. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1306742
Hemmati N, Rahiminezhad Galankashi M, Imani DM, Farughi H (2018) Maintenance policy selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach. J Manuf Technol Manag 29:1253–1268. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2017-0109
Jamali N, Feylizadeh MR, Liu P (2021) Prioritization of aircraft maintenance unit strategies using fuzzy analytic network process: a case study. J Air Transp Manag 93:102057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102057
Jia X, Xu J (2014) Cloud model-based seismic risk assessment of road in earthquake region. J Tongji Univ Sci 42:1352–1358
Karatuğ Ç, Arslanoğlu Y, Guedes Soares C (2022) Determination of a maintenance strategy for machinery systems of autonomous ships. Ocean Eng 266:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113013
Kiani Mavi R, Standing C (2018) Critical success factors of sustainable project management in construction: a fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP approach. J Clean Prod 194:751–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.120
Kirubakaran B, Ilangkumaran M (2016) Selection of optimum maintenance strategy based on FAHP integrated with GRA–TOPSIS. Ann Oper Res 245:285–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1775-3
Li D, Gao J (2010) Study and application of Reliability-centered Maintenance considering Radical Maintenance. J Loss Prev Process Ind 23:622–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.06.008
Li D, Liu C (2004) Study on the universality of the normal cloud model. Eng Sci 6:28–34
Li D, Liu C, Gan W (2009) A new cognitive model: cloud model. Int J Intell Syst 24:357–375
Li X, Ran Y, Wan F et al (2022a) Condition-based maintenance strategy optimization of meta-action unit considering imperfect preventive maintenance based on Wiener process. Flex Serv Manuf J 34:204–233
Li X, Ran Y, Yu H et al (2021a) Maintenance decision of meta-action unit based on Grey-BWM. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Xian, p 032032
Li X, Ran Y, Zhang G (2022b) Optimization of equal-cycle maintenance strategy considering imperfect preventive maintenance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 236:1392–1402
Li X, Ran Y, Zhang G, He Y (2020a) A failure mode and risk assessment method based on cloud model. J Intell Manuf 31:1339–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01513-9
Li X, Ran Y, Zhang G, Yu H (2021b) Selective maintenance of multi-state series systems considering maintenance quality uncertainty and failure effects. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 235:1363–1374
Li Y, Zhang X, Ran Y et al (2020b) Research on meta-action decomposition and meta-action unit modeling technology for electromechanical product. Qual Reliab Eng Int 36:268–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2570
Mathew M, Chakrabortty RK, Ryan MJ (2022) Selection of an optimal maintenance strategy under uncertain conditions: an interval type-2 fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 69:1121–1134
Meshram SG, Alvandi E, Singh VP, Meshram C (2019) Comparison of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for prioritization of watersheds. Soft Comput 23:13615–13625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03900-z
Özcan EC, Ünlüsoy S, Eren T (2017) A combined goal programming–AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78:1410–1423
Rosqvist T, Laakso K, Reunanen M (2009) Value-driven maintenance planning for a production plant. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.018
Sadeghi A, Manesh RA (2012) The application of fuzzy group analytic network process to selection of best maintenance strategy-a case study in mobarakeh steel company. Iran Procedia Soc Behav Sci 62:1378–1383
Seiti H, Tagipour R, Hafezalkotob A, Asgari F (2017) Maintenance strategy selection with risky evaluations using RAHP. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 24:257–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1618
Shyjith K, Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S (2008) Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry. J Qual Maint Eng 14:375–386
Tan Z, Li J, Wu Z et al (2011) An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk based inspection. Saf Sci 49:852–860
Tiejun C, Yundong M (2016) Study on importance of factor of roadway roof fall based on ANP-ECM. Appliction Res Comput 33:3307–3310
Vahdani B, Hadipour H (2011) Extension of the ELECTRE method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Soft Comput 15:569–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-010-0563-5
Vahdani B, Hadipour H, Sadaghiani JS, Amiri M (2010) Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47:1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2241-2
Waeyenbergh G, Pintelon L (2004) Maintenance concept development: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 89:395–405
Waeyenbergh G, Pintelon L (2002) A framework for maintenance concept development. Int J Prod Econ 77:299–313
Wang L, Chu J, Wu J (2007) Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 107:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.005
Yang X, Yan L, Zeng L (2013) How to handle uncertainties in AHP: the Cloud Delphi hierarchical analysis. Inf Sci (ny) 222:384–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.08.019
Yu H, Zhang G, Ran Y (2019) A more reasonable definition of failure mode for mechanical systems using meta-action. IEEE Access 7:4898–4904. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2888542
Yu H, Zhang G, Ran Y et al (2020) A reliability allocation method for mechanical product based on meta-action. IEEE Trans Reliab 69:373–381. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2019.2907517
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51835001), the Independent Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, China (SKLMT-ZZKT-2021R06).
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XL: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. YR: Conceptualization, Methodology. FC: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. XZ: Writing – review & editing. HW: Validation. GZ: Funding acquisition.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
See Tables 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26.
Appendix B
See Tables 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39.
Appendix C
See Tables 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Ran, Y., Fafa, C. et al. A maintenance strategy selection method based on cloud DEMATEL-ANP. Soft Comput 27, 18843–18868 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09035-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09035-6