Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental investigations to the joint resistance of bolted substation and transmission line connectors and its conformity to test standards

  • cigre 2010
  • Published:
e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper summarizes the experimental investigations on joint resistance and current distribution of connections with straight connectors. Different sizes (2–4 covers) and types of contact surface (as cast, riffled) are reviewed. Connectors with 2 covers have the lowest joint resistance whereas connectors with 4 covers do have the best performance factor. The kind of contact surface does not affect the initial joint resistance. To compare these two conductor groove shapes long term tests are necessary. Calculations using a resistance network prove the measured initial joint resistances. The current distribution in the connector body is influenced insignificantly by the joint resistance. The more covers a connector possesses the longer is the estimated lifetime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergmann, R. (1995): Zum Langzeitverhalten des Widerstandes elektrischer Verbindungen. Dresden, 26–31

  • Bergmann, R., Löbl, H., Böhme, H., Grossmann, S. (1996): Model to assess the reliability of electrical joints. 18th Int. Conf. on Electrical Contacts, Chicago 16–20 September 1996: 173–179

  • Bergmann, R., Löbl, H., Böhme, H., Grossmann, S. (1997): Calculation of the Lifetime of Electrical Busbar Joints. ETEP, Vol. 7, No. 5, September/October 1997

  • Blumenroth, F, Löbl, H., Großmann, S., Puffer, R., Hussels, D. (2007): Ageing of high current joints in power transmission and distribution systems. CIRED 19th Int. Conf. on Electricity Distribution, Vienna, 21–24 May 2007

  • Böhme, H., Löbl, H. (1983): Resistanz von Aluminiumschraubverbindungen in Geräten der Elektroenergieübertragung und ihr Einfluss auf deren Zuverlässigkeit. VII. Kontakt-Tagung 1983, Karl-Marx-Stadt: 163–167

  • Bürkner, J. (1995): Grundlagenuntersuchungen zur Diagnose an Verbindungen der Elektrotechnik. Dresden: 4–20

  • EN 50182 (2001): Leiter für Freileitungen. Leiter aus konzentrisch verseilten runden Drähten. p. 57

  • EN 61284 (1995): Freileitungen. Anforderungen und Prüfungen für Armaturen (IEC 1284:1995): 9–12

  • Moustafa, G., Grossmann, S., Abdel-Salam, M., Dessouky, S. S., El-Makkawy, S. M. (2009): Joint resistance of bolted copper bus-bar connections as influenced by mechanical contact devices material and configuration. 13th Middle East Power Systems Conf. MEPCON' 2009, Assiut University, Egypt, December 20–23, 2009

  • Singer, M. T., Kshonze, K. (1991): Electrical resistance of random rough contacting surfaces using fractal surface modeling. Proc. of the 37th IEEE Holm Conf. on Electrical Contacts, 6–9 Oct. 1991: 73–82

  • http://www.werner-electronics.de/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bily, L., Hildmann, C., Moustafa, G. et al. Experimental investigations to the joint resistance of bolted substation and transmission line connectors and its conformity to test standards. Elektrotech. Inftech. 127, 358–361 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-010-0792-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-010-0792-4

Keywords

Navigation