Skip to main content
Log in

Neural network-based analog fault diagnosis using testability analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fault diagnosis procedure for analog linear circuits is presented. It uses an off-line trained neural network as a classifier. The innovative aspect of the proposed approach is the way the information provided by testability and ambiguity group determination is exploited when choosing the neural network architecture. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is shown by comparing with similar work that has already appeared in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu RW (1991) Testing and diagnosis of analog circuits and systems. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

  2. Bandler JW, Salama AE (1985) Fault diagnosis of analog circuits. P IEEE 73:1279–1325

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu D, Starzyk JA (2002) A generalized fault diagnosis method in dynamic analog circuits. Int J Circ Theor App 30:487–510

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Spina R, Upadhyaya S (1997) Linear circuit fault diagnosis using neuromorphic analyzers. IEEE T Circuits–II 44:188–196

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aminian M, Aminian F (2000) Neural network based analog-circuit fault diagnosis using wavelet transform as preprocessor. IEEE T Circuits–II 47:151–156

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aminian F, Aminian M, Collin HW (2002) Analog fault diagnosis of actual circuits using neural networks. IEEE T Instrum Meas 51:544–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Catelani M, Fort A (2002) Soft fault detection and isolation in analog circuits: some results and a comparison between a fuzzy approach and radial basis function networks. IEEE T Instrum Meas 51:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alippi C, Catelani M, Fort A, Mugnaini M (2002) SBT soft fault diagnosis in analog electronic circuits: a sensitivity-based approach by randomized algorithms. IEEE T Instrum Meas 51:1116–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alippi C, Catelani M, Fort A, Mugnaini M (2003) Methods for the automated selection of test frequencies for fault diagnosis in analog electronic circuits: a comparison. In: Proc 20th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf, Vail, CO, 20–22 May, 2003, pp 60–64

  10. Sen N, Saeks R (1979) Fault diagnosis for linear systems via multifrequency measurement. IEEE T Circuits Syst 26:457–465

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen H, Saeks R (1979) A search algorithm for the solution of multifrequency fault diagnosis equations. IEEE T Circuits Syst 26:589–594

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fedi G, Manetti S, Piccirilli MC, Starzyk J (1999) Determination of an optimum set of testable components in the fault diagnosis of analog linear circuit. IEEE T Circuits–I 46:779–787

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duda RO, Hart PE (1973) Pattern classification and scene analysis. Wiley, New York

  14. Fanni A, Giua A, Marchesi M, Montisci A (1999) A neural network diagnosis approach for analog circuits. Appl Intell 11:169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dague Ph, Jehl O, Deves Ph, Luciani P, Taillibert P (1991) When oscillators stop oscillating. In: Proc 12th Int Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia, 24–30 August 1991, pp 1109–1115

  16. Kirkland LV, Dean JS (1994) Monitoring power supply current and using a neural network routine to diagnose circuit faults. AUTOTESTCON’94, Anaheim, CA, 20–22 September 1994, pp 649–651

  17. Spence HF, Burris DP, Lopez J, Houston RA (1991) An artificial neural network printed circuit board diagnostic system based on infrared energy emission. AUTOTESTCON’91 Anheim, CA, 24–26 September 1991, pp 41–45

  18. Spence HF (1994) Printed circuit board diagnosis using artificial neural networks and circuit magnetic fields. IEEE Aero El Sys Mag 9:20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. The Mathworks, Inc. (2004) Matlab user’s guide, Rel 13. The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA

  20. Meador J, Wu A, Tseng CT, Lin TS (1991) Fast diagnosis of integrated circuit faults using feedforward neural networks. In: IEEE Int Joint Conf on Neural Networks, Seattle, WA, 18–21 November 1991, pp 269–273

  21. Rutkowsky G (1992) A neural network approach to fault location in non linear DC circuits. In: 3rd Int Conf on Artificial Neural Networks, Brighton, UK, 4–7 September 1992, pp 1123–1126

  22. Czaja Z, Zielonko R (2003) Fault diagnosis in electronic circuits based on bilinear transformation in 3-D and 4-D spaces. IEEE T Instrum Meas 52:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liberatore A, Manetti S, Piccirilli MC (1994) A new efficient method for analog circuit testability measurement. In: IEEE Instrumentation and Measurements Technology Conf (IMTC), Hamamatsu, Japan, 10–12 May 1994, pp 193–196

  24. Manetti S, Piccirilli MC (2003) A singular-value decomposition approach for ambiguity group determination in analog circuits. IEEE T Circuit–I 50:477–487

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Fanni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cannas, B., Fanni, A., Manetti, S. et al. Neural network-based analog fault diagnosis using testability analysis. Neural Comput & Applic 13, 288–298 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-004-0423-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-004-0423-2

Keywords

Navigation