Skip to main content
Log in

Drill flank wear estimation using supervised vector quantization neural networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drill wear detection and prognosis is one of the most important considerations in reducing the cost of rework and scrap and to optimize tool utilization in hole making industry. This study presents the development and implementation of two supervised vector quantization neural networks for estimating the flank-land wear size of a twist drill. The two algorithms are; the learning vector quantization (LVQ) and the fuzzy learning vector quantization (FLVQ). The input features to the neural networks were extracted from the vibration signals using power spectral analysis and continuous wavelet transform techniques. Training and testing were performed under a variety of speeds and feeds in the dry drilling of steel plates. It was found that the FLVQ is more efficient in assessing the flank wear size than the LVQ. The experimental procedure for acquiring vibration data and extracting features in the time-frequency domain using the wavelet transform is detailed. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed neural network algorithms were effective in estimating the size of the drill flank wear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaldor S, Lenz E (1981) Investigation in tool life of twist drill. Ann CIRP 30(1):

    Google Scholar 

  2. El-Wardany I, Gao D, Elbestawi MA (1996) Tool condition monitoring in drilling using vibration signature analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(6):687–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Looney CG (1997) Pattern recognition using neural networks, theory and algorithms for engineers and scientists. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li PG, Wu S, Wu M (1994) Monitoring drilling wear states by a fuzzy pattern recognition technique. ASME J Eng Ind 110:297–300

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu TI, Wu S, Wu M (1990) On-Line detection of drill wear. ASME J Eng Ind 112:299–302

    Google Scholar 

  6. Govekar E, Grabec I (1994) Self-organizing neural network application to drill wear classification. ASME J Eng Ind 116:233–238

    Google Scholar 

  7. Govekar E, Madsen H, Grabec I (1991) Estimation of drill wear from AE signals using a self-organizing neural network. Proceedings of 4th World Meeting on AE and 1st Inf. Conf. on AE in Manufacturing, Boston, pp 65–71

  8. Liu TI, Anantharaman KS (1994) Intelligent classification and measurement of drill wear. ASME J Eng Ind 116:392–397

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lin SC, Ting CJ (1996) Drill wear monitoring using neural networks. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(4):465–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li X, Dong S, Venuvinod PK (2000) Hybrid learning for tool wear monitoring. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 16:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu TI, Chen WY (1998) Intelligent detection of drill wear. Mech Sys Sig Proc 12(6):863–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiaoli Li, Tso SK (1999) Drill wear monitoring based on current signals. Wear 231:172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tansel IN, Mekdeci C, Rodriguez O, Uragun B (1993) Monitoring drill conditions with wavelet based encoding and neural networks. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 33:559–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dimla DE, Lister PM, Leighton NJ (1997) Neural network solutions to the tool condition monitoring problem in metal cutting - a critical review of methods. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37(9):1219–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohonen T (1986) Learning vector quantization for pattern recognition. Technical Report TKK-F-A601, Helsinki University of Technology

  16. Chung FL, Lee T (1995) Fuzzy competitive learning. Neural Networks 7(3):539–551

    Google Scholar 

  17. MATLAB (2000) Signal processing toolbox user’s guide. The Math Works In, Natick

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marple SL (1987) Chapter 7 In: Digital spectral analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  19. Romberg TM, Cassar AG, Harris RW (1984) A comparison of traditional Fourier and maximum entropy spectral method for vibration analysis. ASME J Vib Ac Str Rel Des 106:36–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Issam Abu-Mahfouz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abu-Mahfouz, I. Drill flank wear estimation using supervised vector quantization neural networks. Neural Comput & Applic 14, 167–175 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-004-0436-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-004-0436-x

Keywords

Navigation