Abstract
Recently, power-supply failures have caused major social losses. Therefore, power-supply systems need to be highly reliable. The objective of this study is to present a significant and effective method of determining a productive investment to protect a power-supply system from damage. In this study, the reliability and risks of each of the units are evaluated with a variance–covariance matrix, and the effects and expenses of replacement are analyzed. The mean–variance analysis is formulated as a mathematical program with the following two objectives: (1) to minimize the risk and (2) to maximize the expected return. Finally, a structural learning model of a mutual connection neural network is proposed to solve problems defined by mixed-integer quadratic programming and is employed in the mean–variance analysis. Our method is applied to a power system network in the Tokyo Metropolitan area. This method enables us to select results more effectively and enhance decision making. In other words, decision-makers can select the investment rate and risk of each ward within a given total budget.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nash HO, Wells MF (1984) Power system disturbances and considerations for power conditioning. In: Conference of recommended industrial and commercial power system technical conferences, pp 1–10
National Fire Protection Association (2006) NFPA 70B: recommended practice for electrical equipment maintenance. In: 2006 Edition
IEEE-SA Standards Board (1997) IEEE recommended practice for the design of reliable industrial and commercial power systems. In: Revision of IEEE Std, pp 493–1997
Handa K, Matsumoto S, Nakamoto M, Uchihira N (2005) An optimization method for investment and maintenance planning of power plants under uncertain environments. IEICE Trans Fundam E88-A(6):1481–1486
Ang BW, Huang JP, Poh KL (1999) Break-even price of distributed generation under uncertainty. Ene J 24(7):579–589
Hoff TE (1997) Using distributed resources to manage risk caused by demand uncertainty. Ene J 21(Special Issue Distributed Resources):63–83
Markowitz H (1987) Mean–variance analysis in portfolio choice and capital markets. In: Blackell
Wei J, Takahashi T, Watada J (2006) Mean–variance approach to replacing unreliable units in a power system. In: International conference on condition monitoring and diagnosis
Toni J, Ahti S (2009) Multicriteria partner selection in virtual organizations with transportation costs and other network interdependencies. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev l 39(1):124–129
Lin C-J, Chen C-H, Lin C-T (2009) A hybrid of cooperative particle swarm optimization and cultural algorithm for neural fuzzy networks and its prediction applications. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 39(1):55–68
Chen J, Lin S (2004) A neural network approach-decision neural network (DNN) for preference assessment. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 34(2):219–225
Yu L, Zhang Y-Q (2005) Evolutionary fuzzy neural networks for hybrid financial predictions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 35(2):244–249
Figueiredo M, Ballini R, Soares S, Andrade M, Gomide F (2004) Learning algorithm for a class of neurofuzzy network and application. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 34(3):293–301
Tan KK, Huang SN, Lim SY, Leow YP, Liaw HC (2006) Geometrical error modeling and compensation using neural networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 36(6):797–809
Shouhong W, Hai W (2008) Password authentication using Hopfield neural network. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 38(2):265–268
Pei-Chang C, Chin-Fuan F, Chen-Hao L (2009) Integrating a piecewise linear representation method and a neural network model for stock trading points prediction. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 39(1):80–92
Dongsong Z, Lina Z (2004) Discovering golden nuggets: data mining in financial application. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 34(4):513–522
Ackley DH, Hinton GE, Sejnowski TJ (1985) A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines. Cogn Sci 9:147–169
Hopfield JJ (1982) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. In: Proceedings of national science, pp 2554–2558
Watada J (1997) Fuzzy portfolio selection and its applications to decision making. Tatra Moutains Math Publ 13:219–248
Watanabe T, Watada J, Oda K (1999) Hierarchical decision making in strategic investment by a Boltzmann machine. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Syst 7(4):429–437
Watada J, Oda K (2000) Formulation of a two-layered Boltzmann machine for portfolio selection. Int J Fuzzy Syst 2(1):39–44
Watanabe T, Watada J (2004) A meta-controlled Boltzmann machine for rebalancing portfolio selection. Cent Euro J Oper Res 12(1):93–103
Hobbs BF (1995) Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning. Euro J Oper Res 83(1):1–20
Nishikawa Y, Tezuka T, Kita H, Nakano S (1992) An optimal electric power-plant planning under uncertainty of demand by means of the scenario aggregation algorithm. The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan Trans. Electron Inform Syst 112-C(6):356–363
Yasuda K, Tsunematsu M, Watanabe T (2001) A study on the robust generation mix under uncertain environments. The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan Trans. Power Ene 121-B(2):164–171
Muraoka Y, Oyama T (2003) Generation planning including distributed generator under uncertainty of demand growth. The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan Trans. Power Ene 123-B(2):162–168
Acknowledgments
The first author would like to thank Universiti Malaysia Perlis and the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia for a study leave in Waseda University under the SLAI-KPT scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yaakob, S.B., Watada, J., Takahashi, T. et al. Reliability enhancement of power systems through a mean–variance approach. Neural Comput & Applic 21, 1363–1373 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0580-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0580-z