Skip to main content
Log in

Applying the fuzzy lattice neurocomputing (FLN) classifier model to gear fault diagnosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gear faults are among the main causes of rotating machines breakdown in industrial applications. Intelligent condition monitoring for fault diagnosis can be helpful for detecting gear faults in an early stage so as to reduce production loss and, in addition, improve operation safety and reliability. In this work, we present an intelligent gear fault diagnosis scheme based on a novel classification model, namely the fuzzy lattice neurocomputing (FLN) classifier model. Five gear states including one healthy state and four defective states are tested in a two-stage gearbox. Statistical parameters in both the time domain and the frequency domain of vibration signals, acquired from gearbox, are used as features. We conducted experiments on a benchmark dataset as well as on a gear faults dataset to evaluate both the classification performance and the computational cost of the FLN classifier comparatively with alternative classification methods from the literature including artificial neural networks, support vector machines and decision trees. Our study has demonstrated that the FLN model yields better classification performance with smaller computational cost than the aforementioned alternative methods. The FLN classifier can further be used for condition monitoring and fault diagnosis in other mechanical systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McFadden PD (2000) Detection of gear faults by decomposition of matched differences of vibration signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 14:805–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stander CJ, Heyns PS, Schoombie W (2002) Using vibration monitoring for local fault detection on gears operating under fluctuating load conditions. Mech Syst Signal Process 16:1005–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saravanan N, Cholairajan S, Ramachandran KI (2009) Vibration-based fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box using fuzzy technique. Expert Syst Appl 36:3119–3135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barszcz T, Jaboski A (2010) A novel method for the optimal band selection for vibration signal demodulation and comparison with the Kurtogram. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:431–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen D, Wang WJ (2002) Classification of wavelet map patterns using multi-layer neural networks for gear fault detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 16:695–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Samanta B (2004) Gear fault detection using artificial neural networks and support vector machines with genetic algorithms. Mech Syst Signal Process 18:625–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saravanan N, Kumar Siddabattuni VNS, Ramachandran KI (2008) A comparative study on classification of features by SVM and PSVM extracted using Morlet wavelet for fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box. Expert Syst Appl 35:1351–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saravanan N, Ramachandran KI (2009) Fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box using discrete wavelet features and Decision Tree classification. Expert Syst Appl 36:9564–9573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saravanan N, Ramachandran KI (2009) A case study on classification of features by fast single-shot multiclass PSVM using Morlet wavelet for fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box. Expert Syst Appl 36:10854–10862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saravanan N, Ramachandran KI (2010) Incipient gear box fault diagnosis using discrete wavelet transform (DWT) for feature extraction and classification using artificial neural network (ANN). Expert Syst Appl 37:4168–4181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saravanan N, Siddabattuni VNSK, Ramachandran KI (2010) Fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box using artificial neural network (ANN), and proximal support vector machine (PSVM). Appl Soft Comput 10:344–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaburlasos VG, Petridis V (2000) Fuzzy lattice neurocomputing (FLN) models. Neural Netw 13:1145–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Petridis V, Kaburlasos VG (2001) Clustering and classification in structured data domains using fuzzy lattice neurocomputing (FLN). IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 13:245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cripps A, Nguyen N, Kaburlasos VG (2003) Three improved fuzzy lattice neurocomputing (FLN) classifiers. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks, pp 1957–1962

  15. Kaburlasos VG (2006) Towards a unified modeling and knowledge-representation based on lattice theory. Studies in computational intelligence, vol 27. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–242

  16. Cripps A, Nguyen N (2007) Fuzzy lattice reasoning (FLR) classification using similarity measures. Stud Comput Intell 67:263–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaburlasos VG, Athanasiadis IN, Mitkas PA (2007) Fuzzy lattice reasoning (FLR) classifier and its application for ambient ozone estimation. Int J Approx Reason 45:152–188

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaburlasos VG, Moussiades L, Vakali A (2009) Fuzzy lattice reasoning (FLR) type neural computation for weighted graph partitioning. Neurocomputing 72:2121–2133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaburlasos VG, Papadakis SE (2009) A granular extension of the fuzzy-ARTMAP (FAM) neural classifier based on fuzzy lattice reasoning (FLR). Neurocomputing 72:2067–2078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Petridis V, Kaburlasos VG (1998) Fuzzy lattice neural network (FLNN): a hybrid model for learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9:877–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Piedra-Fernandez JA, Canton-Garbin M, Guindos-Rojas F (2007) Application of fuzzy lattice neurocomputing (FLN) in ocean satellite images for pattern recognition. Stud Comput Intell 67:215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalamani D, Balasubramanie P (2006) Age classification using fuzzy lattice neural network. In: Proceedings—ISDA 2006: sixth international conference on intelligent systems design and applications, pp 225–230

  23. Athanasiadis IN, Kaburlasos VG (2006) Air quality assessment using fuzzy lattice reasoning (FLR). In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 29–34

  24. Duin PJ RPW, Paclik P, Pekalska E, de Ridder D, Tax DMJ, Verzakov S (2007) PRTools4.1, a matlab toolbox for pattern recognition. University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang W (2001) Early detection of gear tooth cracking using the resonance demodulation technique. Mech Syst Signal Process 15:887–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions toward improving the presentation of our work. This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50705097) and Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (No. E2007001048).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, B., Zhang, Pl., Mi, Ss. et al. Applying the fuzzy lattice neurocomputing (FLN) classifier model to gear fault diagnosis. Neural Comput & Applic 22, 627–636 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0719-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0719-y

Keywords

Navigation