Skip to main content
Log in

3D object recognition based on a geometrical topology model and extreme learning machine

  • Extreme Learning Machine's Theory & Application
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, one geometrical topology hypothesis is present based on the optimal cognition principle, and the single-hidden layer feedforward neural network with extreme learning machine (ELM) is used for 3D object recognition. It is shown that the proposed approach can identify the inherent distribution and the dependence structure for each 3D object along multiple view angles by evaluating the local topological segments with a dipole topology model and developing the relevant mathematical criterion with ELM algorithm. The ELM ensemble is then used to combine the individual single-hidden layer feedforward neural network of each 3D object for performance improvements. The simulation results have shown the excellent performance and the effectiveness of the developed scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Clark A (2001) Mindware: an introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shimshoni I, Ponce J (2000) Probabilistic 3D object recognition. Int J Comput Vis 36(1):51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma Y, Soatto S, Kosecka J, Sastry S (2003) An invitation to 3-D vision: from images to geometric models. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pope AR, Lowe DG (2000) Probabilistic models of appearance for 3-D object recognition. Int J Comput Vis 40(2):149–167

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cyr CM, Kimia BB (2004) A similarity-based aspect-graph approach to 3D object recognition. Int J Comput Vis 57(1):5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Javed O, Shah M, Comaniciu D (2004) A probabilistic framework for object recognition in video. International Conference on Image Processing, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher RA (1952) Contributions to mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Verleysen M, Voz JL, Thissen P, Legat JD (1995) A statistical neural network for high-dimensional vector classification. IEEE international conference on neural networks, ICNN’95, Perth, pp 990–994

  10. Huang D-S (1996) Systematic theory of neural networks for pattern recognition. Publishing House of Electronic Industry of China, Beijing, pp 70–78

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nian R, Ji G-R, Zhao W-C, Feng C (2007) Probabilistic 3D object recognition from 2D invariant view sequence based on similarity. Neurocomputing 70(4–6):785–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vapnik VN (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu L (2002) Bayesian Ying Yang harmony learning. In: Arbib MA (ed) The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang S-J (2003) Biomimetics pattern recognition. INNS, ENNS, JNNS Newletters Elseviers

  15. Nian R, Ji G-R, Zhao W-C, Feng C (2005) ANN hybrid ensemble learning strategy in 3D object recognition and pose estimation based on similarity. Advances in Intelligent Computing, LNCS 3644, ICIC, part 1, pp 650–660

  16. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70:489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang G-B, Ding X, Zhou H (2010) Optimization method based extreme learning machine for classification. Neurocomputing 74:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Man ZH, Lee K, Wang DH, Cao ZW, Miao CY (2011) A modified ELM algorithm for single-hidden layer feedforward neural networks with linear nodes. 2011 6th IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications (ICIEA), pp 2524–2529

  19. Miche Y, Sorjamaa A, Bas P, Simula O, Jutten C, Lendasse A (2010) Optimally-pruned extreme learning machine. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 21:158–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang G-B (2003) Learning capability and storage capacity of two hidden-layer feedforward networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14(2):274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Verleysen M (2003) Learning high-dimensional data. In: Ablameyko S et al (eds) Limitations and future trends in neural computation. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 141–162

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang S-J, Wang B-N (2002) Analysis and theory of high-dimension spatial geometry for artificial neural networks. Acta Electron Sinica 30(1):1–4

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Aupetit M (2007) Visualizing distortions and recovering topology in continuous projection techniques. Neurocomputing 70(7–9):1304–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aupetit M (2005) Learning topology with the generative gaussian graph and the EM algorithm. NIPS, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ji G-R, Nian R, Yang S-M, Zhou L-J, Feng C (2006) Cellular recognition for species of phytoplankton via statistical spatial analysis. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, ICIC, pp 761–766

  26. Koenderink JJ, van Doorn AJ (1976) The singularities of the visual mapping. Biol Cyber 24:51–59

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Basri R, Weinshall D (1996) Distance metric between 3D models and 2D images for recognition and classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 18(4):465–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Casasent DP, Neiberg LM (1995) Classifier and shift-invariant automatic target recognition neural networks. Neural Netw 8(7–8):1117–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lendasse A, Wertz V, Verleysen M (2003) Model selection with cross-validations and bootstraps—application to time series prediction with RBFN models. ICANN 2003, Joint international conference on artificial neural networks, Istanbul (Turkey), volume 2714, pp 573–580

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China (41176076), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of P. R. China (2006AA09Z231), the Science and Technology Development Program of Shandong Province (2008GG1055011, BS2009HZ006), and the Science and Technology Development Program of Qingdao (103413jch).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nian, R., He, B. & Lendasse, A. 3D object recognition based on a geometrical topology model and extreme learning machine. Neural Comput & Applic 22, 427–433 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0892-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0892-7

Keywords