Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Specificity enhancement in classification of breast MRI lesion based on multi-classifier

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MR-based methods have acceded an important role for the clinical detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast has become a robust and successful method, especially for the diagnosis of high-risk cases due to its higher sensitivity compared to X-ray mammography. In the clinical setting, the ANN has been widely applied in breast cancer diagnosis using a subjective impression of different features based on defined criteria. In this study, several neural networks classifiers like MLP, PNN, GRNN, and RBF has been presented on a total of 112 histopathologically verified breast lesions to classify into benign and malignant groups. Also, support vector machine has been considered as classifier. Before applying classification methods, feature selection has been utilized to choose the significant features for classification. Finally, to improve the performance of classification, three classifiers that have the best results among all applied methods have been combined together that they been named as multi-classifier system. For each lesion, final detection as malignant or benign has been evaluated, when the same results have been achieved from two classifiers of multi-classifier system. Tables of results show that the proposed methods are correctly capable to feature selection and improve classification of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen W, Giger L, Brick U (2006) A fuzzy C-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Acad Radiol 13(1):63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Szabo BK, Wiberg MK, Bone B, Aspelin P (2004) Application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of dynamic MR imaging features of the breast. Eur Radiol 14:1217–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lucht RE, Knopp MV, Brix G (2001) Classification of signal–time curves from dynamic MR mammography by neural networks. Magn Reson Imaging 19:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vergnaghi D, Monti A, Setti E, Musumeci R (2001) A use of a neural network to evaluate contrast enhancement curves in breast magnetic resonance images. J Digit Imaging 14(2 Suppl 1):58–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nie K, Chen J-H, Yu H, Chu Y, Nalcioglu O, Min-Ying S (2008) Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad Radiol 15:1513–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nirooie M, Abdolmaleki P, Tavakoli A, Gity M (2009) Feature selection and classification of breast cancer on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network. J Electr Syst 5(1):5–18

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arbacha L, Stolpenb A, Reinhardta JM (2004) Classification of breats MRI lesions using a backpropagation neural network (BNN). Biomedical imaging: nano to macro, 2004. IEEE international symposium on, vol 1, pp 253–256

  8. Bhooshan N, Giger M, Edwards D, Yuan Y, Jansen S, Li H, Lan L, Sattar H, Newstead G (2011) Computerized three-class classification of MRI-based prognostic markers for breast cancer. Phys Med Biol 56(18):5995–6008

    Google Scholar 

  9. Newel D, Nie K, Chen J-H, Hsu C–C, Yu H-J, Nalcioglu O, Su M-Y (2009) Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: difference in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement. Eur Radiol 20(4):771–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. American College of Radiology (ACR) (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas. ACR, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gibbs P, Turnbull LW (2003) Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Magn Reson Med 50:92–98. doi:10.1002/mrm.10496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Texture features for image classification. IEEE Trans SMC 3:610–621. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Wei D, Petrick N, Helvie MA, Adler DD, Goodsitt MM (1996) Image feature selection by a genetic algorithm: application to classification of mass and normal breast tissue. Med Phys 23:1671–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bajpai P, Kumar M (2010) Genetic algorithm—an approach to solve global optimization problems. Indian J Comput Sci Eng 1(3):199–206

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun Z, Bebis G, Yuanl X, Louis SJ (2002) Genetic feature subset selection for gender classification: a comparison study. Applications of computer vision, proceedings. Sixth IEEE workshop, pp 165–170

  16. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA

  17. Mashor MY, Esugasini S, Mat Isa NA, Othman NH (2007) Classification of breast lesions using artificial neural network. IFMBE Proc 15:45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Daoud E (2009) A comparison between three neural network models for classification problems. J Artif Intell 2:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mao KZ, Tan KC, Ser W (2000) Probabilistic neural-network structure determination for pattern classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 11(4):1009–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Niwa T (2003) Using general regression and probabilistic neural networks to predict human intestinal absorption with topological descriptors derived from two-dimensional chemical structures. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haykin S (2001) Redes Neurais: Princ′ ıpios e Pr′ atica, 2nd edn. Bookman, Porto Alegre

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burges CJC (1998) A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Oliveira Martins L, da Corrˆ ea Silval E, Corrˆ ea Silval A, de Paiva A, Gattass M (2007) Classification of breast masses in mammogram images using Ripley’s K function and support vector machine. Machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4571:784–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Subashini TS, Ramalingam V, Palanivel S (2009) Breast mass classification based on cytological patterns using RBFNN and SVM. Expert Syst Appl 36:5284–5290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ireaneus Anna Rejani Y, Thamarai Selvi S (2009) Early detection of breast cancer using SVM classifier technique. Int J Comput Sci Eng 1(3):127–130

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. International joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzaneh Keyvanfard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keyvanfard, F., Shoorehdeli, M.A., Teshnehlab, M. et al. Specificity enhancement in classification of breast MRI lesion based on multi-classifier. Neural Comput & Applic 22 (Suppl 1), 35–45 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0937-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0937-y

Keywords

Navigation