Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Mutual information-based optimization of sparse spatio-spectral filters in brain–computer interface

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, neuro-rehabilitation based on brain–computer interface (BCI) has been considered one of the important applications for BCI. A key challenge in this system is the accurate and reliable detection of motor imagery. In motor imagery-based BCIs, the common spatial patterns (CSP) algorithm is widely used to extract discriminative patterns from electroencephalography signals. However, the CSP algorithm is sensitive to noise and artifacts, and its performance depends on the operational frequency band. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel optimized sparse spatio-spectral filtering (OSSSF) algorithm. The proposed OSSSF algorithm combines a filter bank framework with sparse CSP filters to automatically select subject-specific discriminative frequency bands as well as to robustify against noise and artifacts. The proposed algorithm directly selects the optimal regularization parameters using a novel mutual information-based approach, instead of the cross-validation approach that is computationally intractable in a filter bank framework. The performance of the proposed OSSSF algorithm is evaluated on a dataset from 11 stroke patients performing neuro-rehabilitation, as well as on the publicly available BCI competition III dataset IVa. The results show that the proposed OSSSF algorithm outperforms the existing algorithms based on CSP, stationary CSP, sparse CSP and filter bank CSP in terms of the classification accuracy, and substantially reduce the computational time of selecting the regularization parameters compared with the cross-validation approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, Pfurtscheller G, Vaughan TM (2002) Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 113:767–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Birbaumer N (2006) Brain-computer-interface research: coming of age. Clin Neurophysiol 117:479–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolpaw JR, McFarland DJ, Vaughan TM (2000) Brain-computer interface research at the Wadsworth Center. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8:222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C, Flotzinger D, Pregenzer M (1997) EEG-based discrimination between imagination of right and left hand movement. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 103:642–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McFarland DJ, Wolpaw JR (2008) Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface (BCI): model order selection for autoregressive spectral analysis. J Neural Eng 5:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu S, Tian Q, Cao Y, Zhang J, Kong W (2012) Motor imagery classification based on joint regression model and spectral power. Neural Comput Appl 21(7):1–6 doi:10.1007/s00521-012-1244-3

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buch E, Weber C, Cohen LG, Braun C, Dimyan MA, Ard T, Mellinger J, Caria A, Soekadar S, Fourkas A, Birbaumer N (2008) Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke 39:910–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfurtscheller G, Muller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Neuper C (2008) Rehabilitation with brain-computer interface systems. Comput Aided Des 41:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ang KK, Guan C, Chua KSG, Ang TB, Kuah CWK, Wang C, Phua KS, Chin ZY, Zhang H (2011) A large clinical study on the ability of stroke patients to use EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface. Clin EEG Neurosci 42:253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ang KK, Guan C, Chua KSG, Ang TB, Kuah C, Wang C, Phua KS, Chin ZY, Zhang H (2010) Clinical study of neurorehabilitation in stroke using EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface with robotic feedback. In: IEEE 32th annual international conference of the engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 5549–5552

  11. Nunez PL, Srinivasan R, Westdorp AF, Wijesinghe RS, Tucker DM, Silberstein RB, Cadusch PJ (1997) EEG coherency I: statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 103:499–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blankertz B, Tomioka R, Lemm S, Kawanabe M, Müller KR (2008) Optimizing spatial filters for robust EEG single-trial analysis. IEEE Signal Process Mag 25:41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pregenzer M, Pfurtscheller G (1999) Frequency component selection for an EEG-based brain to computer interface. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 7:413–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fukunaga K (1990) Introduction to statistical pattern recognition 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 26–34

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krauledat M, Dornhege G, Blankertz B, Müller, KR (2007) Robustifying EEG data analysis by removing outliers Chaos Complex Lett 2:259–274

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kang H, Nam Y, Choi S (2009) Composite common spatial pattern for subject-to-subject transfer. IEEE Sig Proc Let 16:683–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu H, Eng HL, Guan C, Plataniotis KN, Venetsanopoulos AN (2010) Regularized common spatial pattern with aggregation for EEG classification in small-sample setting. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57:2936–2946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blankertz B, Kawanabe M, Tomioka R, Hohlefeld F, Nikulin V, Müller KR (2008) Invariant common spatial patterns: alleviating nonstationarities in brain-computer interfacing. In: Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS 20), pp 113–120

  19. Lotte F, Guan C (2010) Regularizing common spatial patterns to improve BCI designs: unified theory and new algorithms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58:355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arvaneh M, Guan C, Ang KK and Quek HC (2011) Spatially sparsed common spatial pattern to improve BCI performance. In: IEEE international conference acoustics speech and signal process, pp 2412–2415.

  21. Arvaneh M, Guan C, Ang KK and Quek C (2011) Optimizing the channel selection and classification accuracy in EEG-based BCI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58:1865–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lemm S, Blankertz B, Curio G, Müller KR (2005) Spatio-spectral filters for improving the classification of single trial EEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(9):1541–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dornhege G, Blankertz B, Krauledat M, Losch F, Curio G, Müller, KR (2006) Combined optimization of spatial and temporal filters for improving brain-computer interfacing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(11):2274–2281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tomioka R, Dornhege G, Nolte G, Blankertz B, Aihara K, Müller KR (2006) Spectrally weighted common spatial pattern algorithm for single trial EEG classification, Technical report, Department of Mathematical Engineering, University of Tokyo, Japan

  25. Wu W, Gao X, Hong B, Gao S (2008) Classifying single-trial EEG during motor imagery by iterative spatio-spectral patterns learning (ISSPL). IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(6):1733–1743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ang KK, Chin ZY, Zhang H, Guan C (2008) Filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP) in brain-computer interface. In: IEEE international joint conference on neural networks, pp 2391–2398

  27. Ang KK, Chin ZY, Zhang H, Guan C (2011) Mutual information-based selection of optimal spatial-temporal patterns for single-trial EEG-based BCIs. Pattern Recogn Lett 45(6):2137–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dornhege G, Blankertz B, Curio G, Müller KR (2004) Boosting bit rates in noninvasive EEG single-trial classifications by feature combination and multiclass paradigms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:993–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramoser H, Müller-Gerking J, Pfurtscheller G (2000) Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8:441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hurley N, Rickard S (2009) Comparing measures of sparsity. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 55(10):4723–4741

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Powell M (1978) A fast algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations. In: Watson G (ed) Numerical analysis. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 144–157

  32. Battiti R (1994) Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning. IEEE Trans Neural Net 5(4):537–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwak N, Choi CH (2002) Input feature selection by mutual information based on Parzen window. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24:1667–1671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1997) Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: the kernel approach with S-Plus illustrations. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Blankertz B, Müller KR, Krusienski DJ, Schalk G, Wolpaw JR, Schlögl A, Pfurtscheller G, Millan JR, Schröder M, Birbaumer N (1997) The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Samek W, Vidaurre C, Müller KR, Kawanabe M (2012) Stationary common spatial patterns for brain-computer interfacing. J Neural Eng 9(2):026013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sprent P, Smeeton N (2001) Applied nonparametric statistical methods. Chapman & Hall, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Arvaneh M, Guan C, Ang K K, Quek C (2013) EEG data space adaptation to reduce inter-session non-stationarity in brain-computer interface. Neural Comput Appl 25(8):2146–2171

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mahnaz Arvaneh

    Present address: Engineering Building, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Ireland

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore

    Mahnaz Arvaneh & Chai Quek

  2. Institute for Infocomm Research, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 138632, Singapore

    Cuntai Guan & Kai Keng Ang

Authors
  1. Mahnaz Arvaneh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cuntai Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kai Keng Ang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chai Quek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahnaz Arvaneh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arvaneh, M., Guan, C., Ang, K.K. et al. Mutual information-based optimization of sparse spatio-spectral filters in brain–computer interface. Neural Comput & Applic 25, 625–634 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-013-1523-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-013-1523-7

Keywords