Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of artificial neural network and adaptive neurofuzzy inference system for prediction of compressional wave velocity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, two solutions for prediction of compressional wave velocity (p wave) are presented and compared: artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Series of analyses were performed to determine the optimum architecture of utilized methods using the trial and error process. Several ANNs and ANFISs are constructed, trained and validated to predict p wave in the investigated carbonate reservoir. A comparative study on prediction of p wave by ANN and ANFIS is addressed, and the quality of the target prediction was quantified in terms of the mean-squared errors (MSEs), correlation coefficient (R 2) and prediction efficiency error. ANFIS with MSE of 0.0552 and R 2 of 0.9647, and ANN with MSE of 0.042 and R 2 of 0.976, showed better performance in comparison with MLR methods. ANN and ANFIS systems have performed comparably well and accurate for prediction of p wave.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zoveidavianpoor M, Samsuri A, Shadizadeh SR (2013) Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for compressional wave velocity prediction in a carbonate reservoir. J Appl Geophys 89:96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zoveidavianpoor M, Samsuri A, Shadizadeh SR (2013) Prediction of compressional wave velocity by artificial neural network using some conventional well logs in a carbonate reservoir. J Geophys Eng 10(4):045014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Verma AK, Singh TN (2013) A Neuro-Fuzzy approach for prediction of longitudinal wave velocity. Neural Comput Appl 22(7–8):1685–1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh TN, Sinha S, Singh VK (2007) Prediction of thermal conductivity of rock through physico-mechanical properties. Build Environ 2:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jarrard RD, Niessen F, Brink JD, Bücker C (2000) Effects of cementation on velocities of siliclastic sediments. Geophys Res Lett 27(5):593–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Verma D, Kainthola A, Singh R, Singh TN (2012) A assessment of geo-mechanical properties of some gondwana coal using p-wave velocity. Int Res J Geol Min 2(9):261–274

    Google Scholar 

  7. Singh R, Vishal V, Singh TN (2012) Soft computing method for assessment of compressional wave velocity. Scientia Iranica Trans Civil Eng 19(4):1018–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nabi-Bidhendi M, King MS (1997) A computer-aided method for calculating ultrasonic p- and s-wave velocities in rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 34:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kazatchenko E, Markov M, Mousatov A, Pervago E (2006) Prediction of the s-wave velocity in carbonate formation using joint inversion of conventional well logs. J Geophys Eng 3(4):386–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kazatchenko E, Markov M, Mousatov A (2004) Joint modeling of acoustic velocities and electrical conductivity from unified microstructure of rocks. J Geophys Res 109(B01202):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kalogirou SA (2000) Applications of artificial neural-networks for energy systems. Appl Energy 67:17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1, chapter 8. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

  13. Singh R, Vishal V, Singh TN, Ranjith PG (2013) A comparative study of generalized regression neural network approach and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems for prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rocks. Neural Comput Appl 23:499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kenter J, Podladchikov F, Reinders M, Van der Gaast S, Fouke B, Sonnenfeldet M (1997) Parameters controlling sonic velocities in a mixed carbonate—siliciclastics Permian shelf-margin upper San Andres formation, last chance Canyon, New Mexico. Geophysics 62:505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh VK, Singh D, Singh TN (2001) Prediction of strength properties of some schistose rocks from petrographic properties using artificial neural networks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the financial and administration support to Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), and VOTE No. 10J11. Also, the author wishes to express his thanks and appreciation National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) and his group members in the Faculty of Petroleum Engineering & Renewable Energy Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mansoor Zoveidavianpoor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zoveidavianpoor, M. A comparative study of artificial neural network and adaptive neurofuzzy inference system for prediction of compressional wave velocity. Neural Comput & Applic 25, 1169–1176 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1604-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1604-2

Keywords

Navigation