Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A tuned NSGA-II to optimize the total cost and service level for a just-in-time distribution network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distribution network planning has attracted the attention of many studies during last decades. Just-in-time (JIT) distribution has a key role in efficient delivery of products within distribution networks. In modeling of JIT distribution networks, the most frequently applied objectives are related to cost and service level. However, evaluating the impact of simultaneously minimizing total costs and balance between distribution network entities in different echelons still rarely complies with the current literature. To remedy this shortcoming and model reality more accurately, this paper develops a multi-objective mixed-integer nonlinear optimization model for a JIT distribution in three-echelon distribution network. The aims are minimization of total logistics cost along with maximization of capacity utilization balance for distribution centers and manufacturing plants. A non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) with three different mutation operators namely swap, reversion and insertion is employed to provide a set of near-optimal Pareto solutions. Then, the provided solutions are verified with non-dominated ranked genetic algorithm (NRGA) as well. The Taguchi method in design of experiments tunes the parameters of both algorithms, and their performances are then compared in terms of some multi-objective performance measures. In addition, a genetic algorithm is used to assess Pareto optimal solutions of NSGA-II. Different problems with different sizes are considered to compare the performance of the suggested algorithms. The results show that the proposed solution approach performs efficiently. Finally, the conclusion and some directions for future research are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amiri A (2006) Designing a distribution network in a supply chain system: formulation and efficient solution procedure. Eur J Oper Res 171(2):567–576

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Sadeghi J et al (2013) Optimizing a multi-vendor multi-retailer vendor managed inventory problem: two tuned meta-heuristic algorithms. Knowl Based Syst 50:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Memari A, Rahim ARBA, Ahmad RB (2014) Production planning and inventory control in automotive supply chain networks. In: Ali M, Pan J-S, Chen S-M, Horng M-F (eds) Modern advances in applied intelligence. Springer, pp 430–439

  4. Lalmazloumian M et al (2013) A robust optimization model for agile and build-to-order supply chain planning under uncertainties. Ann Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10479-013-1421-5

  5. Pasandideh SHR, Niaki STA, Asadi K (2015) Bi-objective optimization of a multi-product multi-period three-echelon supply chain problem under uncertain environments: NSGA-II and NRGA. Inf Sci 292:57–74

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Memari A, Rahim ARA, Ahmad RB (2015) An integrated production-distribution planning in green supply chain: a multi-objective evolutionary approach. Procedia CIRP 26:700–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Memari A, Rahim ARA, Ahmad R (2014) Multi-objective genetic algorithm in green just-in-time logistics. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). IEEE

  8. Sabri EH, Beamon BM (2000) A multi-objective approach to simultaneous strategic and operational planning in supply chain design. Omega 28(5):581–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan FT, Chung S, Wadhwa S (2005) A hybrid genetic algorithm for production and distribution. Omega 33(4):345–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Che Z, Chiang C-J (2010) A modified Pareto genetic algorithm for multi-objective build-to-order supply chain planning with product assembly. Adv Eng Softw 41(7):1011–1022

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasiri GR, Zolfaghari R, Davoudpour H (2014) An integrated supply chain production–distribution planning with stochastic demands. Comput Ind Eng 77:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abbasian-Hosseini SA, Nikakhtar A, Ghoddousi P (2014) Verification of lean construction benefits through simulation modeling: a case study of bricklaying process. KSCE J Civ Eng 18(5):1248–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nikakhtar A et al (2015) Application of lean construction principles to reduce construction process waste using computer simulation: a case study. Int J Serv Oper Manag 20(4):461–480

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang W, Fung RY, Chai Y (2004) Approach of just-in-time distribution requirements planning for supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 91(2):101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farahani RZ, Elahipanah M (2008) A genetic algorithm to optimize the total cost and service level for just-in-time distribution in a supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding H, Benyoucef L, Xie X (2009) Stochastic multi-objective production-distribution network design using simulation-based optimization. Int J Prod Res 47(2):479–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghasimi SA, Ramli R, Saibani N (2014) A genetic algorithm for optimizing defective goods supply chain costs using JIT logistics and each-cycle lengths. Appl Math Model 38(4):1534–1547

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Talbi E-G (2009) Metaheuristics: from design to implementation, vol 74. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Absi N et al (2016) A relax-and-repair heuristic for the Swap-Body Vehicle Routing Problem. Ann Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10479-015-2098-8

  20. Deb K et al (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1917, pp 849–858

  21. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, vol 16. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Al Jadaan O, Rajamani L, Rao CR (2008) Non-dominated ranked genetic algorithm for solving multiobjective optimization problems: NRGA. J Theor Appl Inf Technol 2:60–67

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jayaraman V, Pirkul H (2001) Planning and coordination of production and distribution facilities for multiple commodities. Eur J Oper Res 133(2):394–408

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zarei M et al (2012).Identifying significant factors of brick laying process through design of experiment and computer simulation: a case study. In: Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (WASET)

  25. Taguchi G, Clausing D, Watanabe LT (1987) System of experimental design: engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize costs, vol 1. UNIPUB/Kraus International Publications White Plains, NY

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roy RK (1990) A primer on the Taguchi method. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Taguchi G, Chowdhury S, Wu Y (2005) Taguchi’s quality engineering handbook. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashkan Memari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Memari, A., Abdul Rahim, A.R., Hassan, A. et al. A tuned NSGA-II to optimize the total cost and service level for a just-in-time distribution network. Neural Comput & Applic 28, 3413–3427 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2249-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2249-0

Keywords

Navigation