Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction for network traffic of radial basis function neural network model based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The neural network data are usually characterized by abruptness, nonlinearity and time variability, and thus, it is difficult to yield accuracy results of network traffic prediction based on a traditional radial basis function neural network that has the shortcomings of slow convergence and easily falling to local optimum. To improve the accuracy of network traffic prediction and optimize the method of parameter and structure setting for a neural network, a model of radial basis function neural network with improved particle swarm optimization algorithm is proposed by referring to the related theories of network traffic and phase space reconstruction. The improved particle swarm optimization algorithm can adjust the inertia weight and the learning factors, and make \(t\)-distribution mutation of particles’ positions via global extremum to avoid local convergence and thereby improving its global searching capacity; with such an algorithm, the parameters of radial basis function neural network are optimized; then, in order to verify the algorithm’s effectiveness, the radial basis function neural network is trained to become an optimal prediction model, which is adopted for the prediction of two typical chaotic time series and the real network traffic. It is then compared with the traditional radial basis function neural network model and the radial basis function prediction model by improved particle swarm optimization; and the simulations result shows that the application of this model improves the accuracy of network traffic prediction, and demonstrates the algorithm’s feasibility and effectiveness for network traffic prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leland WE, Taqqu NS, Willinger W et al (1994) On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 2(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beran J, Sherman R, Taqqu MS et al (1995) Long-range dependence in variable-bit-rate video traffic. IEEE Trans Commun 43(2/3/4):1566–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crovella ME, Bestavros A (1997) Self-similarity in world wide web traffic: evidence and possible cause. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw (TON) 5(6):835–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park K, Walter Willinger W (2000) Self-similar network traffic and performance evaluation. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Roughan M, Veitch D, Abry P (2000) Real-time estimation of the parameters of long-range dependence. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw (TON) 8(4):467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi H T (2010) Periodic traffic prediction algorithm of markov based on normal smooth sequence. J Qingdao Agric Univ 27(4):330–333

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sang A, Li SQ (2000) A predictability analysis of network traffic. Comput Netw 1(01):329–345

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou Q, Peng H (2014) Research on network traffic prediction scheme based on autoregressive moving average. Comput Sci 41(4):75–79

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen H, Hu N (2012) Network traffic prediction based on hybrid model of autoregressive and neural networking. Comput Meas Control 20(5):1379–1386

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer W, Meier-Hellstern K (1993) The Markov-Modulated Poisson Process (MMPP) cookbook. Perform Eval 18(2):149–171

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hotnik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feed forward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 1(2):3592366

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wei D (2016) Network traffic prediction based on RBF neural network optimized by improved gravitation search algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 1–10

  13. Atiya AF, Alym A, Parlosa G (2005) Sparse basis selection: new results and application to adaptive prediction of video source traffic. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16(5):1136–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu H (2013) Network traffic prediction based on wavelet analysis and hopfield neural network. Comput Appl Softw 30(6):246–249

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao QY (2013) Network traffic prediction based on neural network optimized by GA. Microelectron Comput 30(3):32–39

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hou Y, Wu ZD (2015) Network traffic prediction based on improved T-S fuzzy neural network. J Univ Jinan 29(4):280–285

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li HY, Li D (2011) Study on network traffic forecasting based on improved neural network. Comput Simul 28(9):132–135

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang JS (2008) Network traffic modeling and prediction based on RBF neural network. Comput Eng Appl 44(13):6–12

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rashedi E, Nezamabadi-pour H, Saryazdi S (2009) DE: a gravitational search algorithm. Inf Sci 179(13):2232–2248

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang C, Xu GL (2014) Prediction for traffic flow of RBF neural network based on cloud genetic algorithm. Comput Eng Appl 50(16):216–220

    Google Scholar 

  21. Packard NH, Crutchfield JP, Farmer JD et al (1980) Shaw geometry from a time series. Phys Lett 45(9):712–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Lecture Notes Math 898:361–381

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Grassberger P, Procaccia I (1983) Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 9(1–2):189–208

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng MY, Ko CH (2006) A Genetic-Fuzzy-Neuro Model Encodes FNNs Using SWRM and BRM. Eng Appl Artif Intell 19(8):891–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang J, Sun L, Fei XY et al (2007) Chaos analysis of the electrical signal time series evoked by Acupuncture. Chaos Solitons Fractals 33(3):901–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Subbaraj P, Rajnarayanan PN (2010) Optimal reactive power dispatch by particle swarm optimization with cauchy and adaptive mutations. In 2010 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information, Telecommunication and Computing (1):110–115

  27. Wu Q (2010) Power load forecasts based on hybrid PSO with Gaussian and adaptive mutation and Wv-SVM. Expert Syst Appl 37(1):194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rathie PN (2012) Stable and generalized-t distributions and applications. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 17(12):5088–5096

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu KJ, Wang TJ (2013) Prediction of chaotic time series based on RBF neural network optimization. Comput Eng 39(10):208–216

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liu ZJ (2009) MATLAB scientific computing and visualization simulation [M]. Electronic industry press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Research Project of Education Department of Jilin Province (No. 199th Document in 2012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dengfeng Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Wei, D. Prediction for network traffic of radial basis function neural network model based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Neural Comput & Applic 29, 1143–1152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2483-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2483-5

Keywords

Navigation