Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Novel mislabeled training data detection algorithm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a kind of noise, mislabeled training data exist in many applications. Because of their negative effects on learning, many filter techniques have been proposed to identify and eliminate them. Ensemble learning-based filter (EnFilter) is the most widely used filter which employs ensemble classifiers. In EnFilter, first the noisy training dataset is divided into several subsets. Each noisy subset is then checked by the multiple classifiers which are trained based on other noisy subsets. It is noted that since the training data used to train multiple classifiers are noisy, the quality of these classifiers cannot be guaranteed, which might generate poor noise identification result. This problem is more serious when the noise ratio in the training dataset is high. To solve this problem, a straightforward but effective approach is proposed in this work. Instead of using noisy data to train the classifiers, nearly noise-free (NNF) data are used since they are supposed to train more reliable classifiers. To this end, a novel NNF data extraction approach is also proposed. Experimental results on a set of benchmark datasets illustrate the utility of our proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guan D, Yuan W, Lee YK (2009) Nearest neighbor editing aided by unlabeled data. Inf Sci 179(13):2273–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van J, Khoshgoftaar T, Huang H (2007) The pairwise attribute noise detection algorithm. Knowl Inf Syst 11(2):171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van J, Khoshgoftaar T (2009) Knowledge discovery from imbalanced and noisy data. Data Knowl Eng 68(12):1513–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu XQ, Wu XD (2004) Class noise vs. attribute noise: a quantitative study. Artif Intell Rev 22(3):177–210

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu XQ, Wu XD, Yang Y (2004) Dynamic classifier selection for effective mining from noisy data streams. In: Proceedings of fourth IEEE international conference on data mining, pp 305–312

  6. Ma T, Zhou J, Tang M (2015) Social network and tag sources based augmenting collaborative recommender system. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 98(4):902–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bi Y, Jeske DR (2010) The efficiency of logistic regression compared to normal discriminant analysis under class-conditional classification noise. J Multivar Anal 101(7):1622–1637

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Nettleton D, Orriols-Puig A, Fornells A (2010) A study of the effect of different types of noise on the precision of supervised learning techniques. Artif Intell Rev 33(4):275–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang J, Yang Y (2003) Robustness of regularized linear classification methods in text categorization. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp 190–197

  10. Opitz D, Maclin R (1999) Popular ensemble methods: an empirical study. J Artif Intell Res 11:169–198

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dietterich TG (2000) An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: bagging, boosting, and randomization. Mach Learn 40(2):139–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ratsch G, Onoda T, Muller K (2001) Soft margins for AdaBoost. Mach Learn 42(3):287–320

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. West M et al (2001) Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles. In: Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, pp 11462–11467

  14. Hickey RJ (2006) Noise modelling and evaluating learning from examples. Artif Intell 82(1):157–179

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Pechenizkiy M, Tsymbal A, Puuronen S, Pechenizkiy O (2006) Class noise and supervised learning in medical domains: the effect of feature extraction. In: Proceedings of 19th IEEE symposium on computer-based medical systems, pp 708–713

  16. Bootkrajang J, Kaban A (2013) Classification of mislabelled microarrays using robust sparse logistic regression. Bioinformatics 29(7):870–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saez J, Galar M, Luengo J, Herrera F (2012) A first study on decomposition strategies with data with class noise using decision trees. Hybrid Artif Intell Syst (Lect Notes Comput Sci) 7209:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beigman E, Klebanov BB (2009) Learning with annotation noise. In: Proceedings of the joint conference of the 47th annual meeting of the ACL and the 4th international joint conference on natural language processing, pp 280–287

  19. Sastry PS, Nagendra GD, Manwani N (2010) A team of continuous action learning automata for noise-tolerant learning of half-spaces. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 40(1):19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Manwani N, Sastry PS (2013) Noise tolerance under risk minimization. IEEE Trans Cybern 43(3):1146–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abellan J, Masegosa AR (2010) Bagging decision trees on data sets with classification noise. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on foundations of information and knowledge systems, pp 248–265

  22. Abellan J, Moral S (2003) Building classification trees using the total uncertainty criterion. Int J Intell Syst 18(12):1215–1225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Brodley CE, Friedl MA (1996) Improving automated land cover mapping by identifying and eliminating mislabeled observations from training data. In: Proceedings of geoscience and remote sensing symposium, pp 1379–1381

  24. Brodley CE, Friedl MA (1999) Identifying mislabeled training data. J Artif Intell Res 11:131–167

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Chaudhuri BB (1996) A new definition of neighborhood of a point in multi-dimensional space. Pattern Recognit Lett 17:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Guan D, Yuan W et al (2011) Identifying mislabeled training data with the aid of unlabeled data. Appl Intell 35(3):345–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. John GH (1995) Robust decision trees: removing outliers from databases. In: Proceeding of international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 174–179

  28. Marques AI et al (1876) Decontamination of training data for supevised pattern recognition. Adv Pattern Recognit Lect Notes Comput Sci 2000:621–630

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marques AI et al (2003) Analysis of new techniques to obtain quality training sets. Pattern Recognit Lett 24:1015–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Metxas et al (2004) Distinguishing mislabeled data from correctly labeled data in classifier design. In: Proceedings of 16th IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence, pp 668–672

  31. Verbaeten S, Assche, AV (2003) Ensemble methods for noise elimination in classification problems. In: Proceeding of 4th international workshop on multiple classifier systems, pp 317–325

  32. Wilson DL (1992) Asymptotic properties of nearest neighbor rules using edited data. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2(3):431–433

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu X, Zhu X, Chen Q (2003) Eliminating class noise in large datasets. In: Proceeding of international conference on machine learning, pp 920–927

  34. Young J, Ashburner J, Ourselin S (2013) Wrapper methods to correct mislabeled training data. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on pattern recognition in neuroimaging, pp 170–173

  35. Zhou ZH, Jiang Y (2004) Editing training data for kNN classifiers with neural network ensemble. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3173:356–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gu B, Sheng VS, Tay KY et al (2015) Incremental support vector learning for ordinal regression. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(7):1403–1416

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Gu B, Sheng VS (2016) A robust regularization path algorithm for-support vector classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2527796

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gu B, Sun XM, Sheng VS (2016) Structural Minimax Probability Machine. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2544779

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gu B, Sheng VS, Wang Z et al (2015) Incremental learning for-support vector regression. Neural Netw 67:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wen X, Shao L, Xue Y et al (2015) A rapid learning algorithm for vehicle classification. Inf Sci 295:395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yuan W, Guan D, Shen L et al (2014) An empirical study of filter-based feature selection algorithms using noisy training data. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international conference on information science and technology, pp 209–212

  42. Guan D et al (2014) Detecting potential labeling errors for bioinformatics by multiple voting. Knowl Based Syst 66:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nicholson B, Zhang J, Sheng VS (2015) Label noise correction methods. In: Proceedings of 2015 IEEE international conference on data science and advanced analytics, pp 1–9

  44. Frenay B, Verleysen M (2014) Classification in the presence of label noise: a survey. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 25(5):845–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Triguero I, Saez JA, Luengo J (2014) On the characterization of noise filters for self-training semi-supervised in nearest neighbor classification. Neurocomputing 132:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” No. NS2016089.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 211-106, Jiangsu, China

    Weiwei Yuan, Donghai Guan & Qi Zhu

  2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210-023, China

    Weiwei Yuan, Donghai Guan & Qi Zhu

  3. Jiangsu Engineering Centre of Network Monitoring, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210-044, Jiangsu, China

    Tinghuai Ma

Authors
  1. Weiwei Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donghai Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qi Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tinghuai Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donghai Guan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, W., Guan, D., Zhu, Q. et al. Novel mislabeled training data detection algorithm. Neural Comput & Applic 29, 673–683 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2589-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2589-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation