Skip to main content
Log in

A novel approach for automated detection of focal EEG signals using empirical wavelet transform

  • New Trends in data pre-processing methods for signal and image classification
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The determination of epileptogenic area is a prime task in presurgical evaluation. The seizure activity can be prevented by operating the affected areas by clinical surgery. In this paper, an automatic approach has been presented to detect electroencephalogram (EEG) signals of non-focal and focal groups. The proposed approach can be used to determine the area linked to the focal epilepsy. In our method, the EEG signal is decomposed into rhythms using empirical wavelet transform technique. The two-dimensional (2D) projections of the reconstructed phase space (RPS) have been obtained for the rhythms. Area measures for various RPS plots are estimated using central tendency measure (CTM) parameter. The area parameters are used with least-squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) classifier to classify the focal and non-focal classes of EEG signals. In this work, we have achieved a maximum classification accuracy of 90%, sensitivity and specificity of 88 and 92%, respectively, using 50 pairs of focal and non-focal EEG signals. The same method has achieved maximum classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 82.53, 81.60 and 83.46%, respectively, with 750 pairs of signals. The developed prototype can be used for the epileptic patients and aid the clinicians to confirm diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acharya UR, Sree SV, Swapna G, Martis RJ, Suri JS (2013) Automated EEG analysis of epilepsy: a review. Knowl Based Syst 45:147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrzejak RG, Schindler K, Rummel C (2012) Nonrandomness, nonlinear dependence, and nonstationarity of electroencephalographic recordings from epilepsy patients. Phys Rev E 86(4):046206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bajaj V, Pachori RB (2012) Separation of rhythms of EEG signals based on Hilbert–Huang transformation with application to seizure detection. In: Convergence and hybrid information technology, pp 493–500

  4. Cohen ME, Hudson DL, Deedwania PC (1996) Applying continuous chaotic modeling to cardiac signal analysis. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 15(5):97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Das AB, Bhuiyan MIH (2016) Discrimination and classification of focal and non-focal EEG signals using entropy-based features in the EMD-DWT domain. Biomed Signal Process Control 29:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Daubechies I et al (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets, vol 61. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Freund RJ, Wilson WJ, Mohr DL (2010) Statistical methods, 3rd ed. Academic Press, Burlington, MA, USA  

  8. Ghorbani MA, Kisi O, Aalinezhad M (2010) A probe into the chaotic nature of daily streamflow time series by correlation dimension and largest Lyapunov methods. Appl Math Model 34(12):4050–4057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilles J (2013) Empirical wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Signal Process 61(16):3999–4010

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Heal K, Navarro K, Wollner M, Gilles EYJ, Kerr W, Douglas PK, Meyer T (2013) Epilepsy classification, EEG analysis, and EEG-FMRI fusion. Technical report. http://www.math.ucla.edu/~bertozzi/WORKFORCE/REU%202013/Epilepsy/epilepsy_eeg_fmri_report.pdf

  11. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen NC, Tung CC, Liu HH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. In: Proceedings of the royal society of London A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, vol 454. The Royal Society, pp 903–995

  12. Kantz H, Schreiber T (2004) Nonlinear time series analysis, vol 7. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kohavi R et al (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: 14th international joint conference on artificial intelligence,  pp 1137–1145  

  14. Kroemer KHE, Kroemer HJ (1997) Engineering physiology: bases of human factors/ergonomics. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Newton MR et al (1995) SPECT in the localisation of extratemporal and temporal seizure foci. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 59(1):26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pachori RB, Sharma R, Patidar S (2015) Classification of normal and epileptic seizure EEG signals based on empirical mode decomposition. In: Zhu Q, Azar AT (eds) Complex system modelling and control through intelligent soft computations. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 319. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 367–388

  17. Pachori RB, Sircar P (2008) EEG signal analysis using FB expansion and second-order linear TVAR process. Sig Process 88(2):415–420

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Patidar S, Pachori RB (2014) Classification of cardiac sound signals using constrained tunable-Q wavelet transform. Expert Syst Appl 41(16):7161–7170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patidar S, Pachori RB, Garg N (2015) Automatic diagnosis of septal defects based on tunable-Q wavelet transform of cardiac sound signals. Expert Syst Appl 42(7):3315–3326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pachori RB, Hewson D, Snoussi H, Duchêne J (2009) Postural time-series analysis using empirical mode decomposition and second-order difference plots. In: IEEE International conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, pp 537–540

  21. Roulston MS (1999) Estimating the errors on measured entropy and mutual information. Phys D 125(3):285–294

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Salisbury JI, Sun Y (2004) Assessment of chaotic parameters in nonstationary electrocardiograms by use of empirical mode decomposition. Ann Biomed Eng 32(10):1348–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Savic I, Thorell JO, Roland P (1995) [11C] Flumazenil positron emission tomography visualizes frontal epileptogenic regions. Epilepsia 36(12):1225–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schiff SJ, Aldroubi A, Unser M, Sato S (1994) Fast wavelet transformation of EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91(6):442–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Seeck M et al (1998) Non-invasive epileptic focus localization using EEG-triggered functional MRI and electromagnetic tomography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 106(6):508–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah M, Saurav S, Sharma R, Pachori RB (2014) Analysis of epileptic seizure EEG signals using reconstructed phase space of intrinsic mode functions. In: 9th International conference on industrial and information systems, pp 1–6

  27. Sharma R, Pachori RB (2015) Classification of epileptic seizures in EEG signals based on phase space representation of intrinsic mode functions. Expert Syst Appl 42(3):1106–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharma R, Pachori RB, Acharya UR (2015) An integrated index for the identification of focal electroencephalogram signals using discrete wavelet transform and entropy measures. Entropy 17(8):5218–5240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma R, Pachori RB, Acharya UR (2015) Application of entropy measures on intrinsic mode functions for the automated identification of focal electroencephalogram signals. Entropy 17(2):669–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma R, Pachori RB, Gautam S (2014) Empirical mode decomposition based classification of focal and non-focal EEG signals. In: International conference on medical biometrics, pp 135–140

  31. Sircar P, Pachori RB, Kumar R (2009) Analysis of rhythms of EEG signals using orthogonal polynomial approximation. In: Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on hybrid information technology, pp 176–180

  32. Snoussi H, Amoud H, Doussot M, Hewson D, Duchêne J (2006) Reconstructed phase spaces of intrinsic mode functions. Application to postural stability analysis. In: 28th Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 4584–4589

  33. Suykens JAK, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9(3):293–300

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Thakor NV, Xin-Rong G, Yi-Chun S, Hanley DF (1993) Multiresolution wavelet analysis of evoked potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40(11):1085–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang N, Lyu MR (2015) Extracting and selecting distinctive EEG features for efficient epileptic seizure prediction. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 19(5):1648–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang L, Zhou W, Jiao L (2004) Wavelet support vector machine. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 34(1):34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhong J, Shuren Q, Chenglin P (2008) Study on separation for the frequency bands of EEG signal and frequency band relative intensity analysis based upon EMD. In: 7th WSEAS international conference on signal processing, robotics and automation, University of Cambridge, UK, pp 20–22

  39. Zhu G, Li Y, Wen PP, Wang S, Xi M Epileptogenic focus detection in intracranial EEG based on delay permutation entropy. In: Proceedings of AIP conference, vol 1559. American Institute of Physics, pp 31–36

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhijit Bhattacharyya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacharyya, A., Sharma, M., Pachori, R.B. et al. A novel approach for automated detection of focal EEG signals using empirical wavelet transform. Neural Comput & Applic 29, 47–57 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2646-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2646-4

Keywords

Navigation