Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Light microscopy image de-noising using optimized LPA-ICI filter

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microscopic images are often corrupted by noise, where Poisson noise is one of the major types that can damage them. The local polynomial approximation (LPA) filter supported by the intersection confidence interval (ICI) rule was considered as an efficient filter for image de-noising. However, this filter depends on several parameters that affect its performance. In order to determine the optimal parameters, the present study employed the classic LPA-ICI (C-LPA-ICI) filter supported by optimization algorithms, namely the genetic algorithm (GA) and the particle swarm optimization (PSO) in the context of light microscopy imaging systems. Nevertheless, inclusion of the optimization algorithms increased the computational time. A novel automatic technique entitled “Standard Optimized LPA-ICI” (SO-LPA-ICI) is proposed. In this context, the average of the optimized ICI parameters was calculated, which obtained from both LPA-ICI-based GA (G-LPA-ICI) and LPA-ICI-based PSO (P-LPA-ICI). Thus, the proposed SO-LPA-ICI is included the optimal ICI parameters without optimization iterations. This procedure is proposed to speed up the optimized filter. A pool of 50 rats’ renal microscopic images is involved to test the proposed approach. A comparative study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the four methods, namely C-LPA-ICI, G-LPA-ICI, P-LPA-ICI, and the SO-LPA-ICI for de-noising in the presence of Poisson noise. The experimental results established the outstanding performance of the SO-LPA-ICI in terms of the PSNR, MAE, and MSSIM with 28.27, 7.65, and 0.93 values, respectively. In addition, the proposed approach achieved fast de-noising compared to the G-LPA-ICI and the P-LPA-ICI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee K, Kim K, Jung J, Heo J, Cho S, Lee S, Chang G, Jo Y, Park H, Park Y (2013) Quantitative phase imaging techniques for the study of cell pathophysiology: from principles to applications. Sensors 13:4170–4191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Timpson P, McGhee E, Anderson K (2011) Imaging molecular dynamics in vivo—from cell biology to animal models. J Cell Sci 124(17):2877–2890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mavandadi S, Dimitrov S, Feng S, Yu F, Sikora U, Lidere O, Padmanabhan S, Nielsen K, Ozcan A (2012) Distributed medical image analysis and diagnosis through crowd-sourced games: a malaria case study. PLoS ONE 7(5):e37245. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dey N, Ashour AS, Ashour AS, Singh A (2015) Digital analysis of microscopic images in medicine. J Adv Microsc Res 10:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hore S, Chakroborty S, Ashour AS, Dey N, Ashour AS, Sifaki-pistolla D, Bhattacharya T, Chaudhuri SRB (2015) Finding contours of hippocampus brain cell using microscopic image analysis. J Adv Microsc Res 10(2):93–103. doi:10.1166/jamr.2015.1245

  6. Murphy DB (2001) Fundamentals of light microscopy and electronic imaging. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K, Astola J (2002) Adaptive window size image de-noising based on intersection of confidence intervals (ICI) rule. J Math Imaging Vis 16:223–235

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu Y, Jiang X, Xin F, Zhang T, Yuan J, Zhai L, Guo C (2008) An algorithm on processing medical image based on rough-set and genetic algorithm. In: International conference on information technology and applications in biomedicine, (2008.ITAB 2008), pp 109–111

  9. Samanta S, Dey N, Das P, Acharjee S, Chaudhuri S (2012) Multilevel threshold based gray scale image segmentation using cuckoo search. In: International conference on emerging trends in electrical, communication and information technologies (ICECIT)

  10. Chakraborty S, Pal A, Dey N, Das D, Acharjee S (2014) Foliage area computation using monarch butterfly algorithm. In: 2014 International conference on non conventional energy (ICONCE 2014)

  11. Acharjee S, Dey N, Samanta S, Das D, Roy R, Chakraborty S, Chaudhuri S (2014) ECG signal compression using ant weight lifting algorithm for tele-monitoring. J Med Imaging Health Inform

  12. Day N, Samanta S, Chakraborty S, Das A, Chaudhuri S, Suri J (2014) Firefly algorithm for optimization of scaling factors during embedding of manifold medical information: an application in ophthalmology imaging. J Med Imaging Health Inform 4(3):384–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bai Q (2010) Analysis of particle swarm optimization algorithm. Comput Inf Sci 3(1):180–184

    Google Scholar 

  14. George G, Raimond K (2013) A survey on optimization algorithms for optimizing the numerical functions. Int J Comput Appl 61(6):41–46

    Google Scholar 

  15. Willett RM, Nowak RD (2004) Fast multiresolution photon-limited image reconstruction. In: IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: nano to macro, vol 2, pp 1192–1195

  16. Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K (2007) Image denoising by sparse 3d-transform domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(8):2080–2095

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodrigues I, Sanches J (2009) Fluorescence microscopy imaging denoising with log-Euclidean priors and photobleaching compensation.In: 16th IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), pp 809–812

  18. Homem MRP, Zorzan MR, Mascarenhas NDA (2011) Poisson noise reduction in deconvolution microscopy. J Comput Interdiscip Sci 2(3):173–177

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luisier F, Blu T, Unser M (2011) Image denoising in mixed Poisson–Gaussian noise. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(3):696–708

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jezierska A, Talbot H, Chaux C, Pesquet J, Engler G (2012) Poisson–Gaussian noise parameter estimation in fluorescence microscopy imaging. In: International symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI), Barcelona

  21. Katkovnik V (2005) Multiresolution local polynomial regression: a new approach to pointwise spatial adaptation. Digit Sig Process 15:73–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K, Astola J (2005) A spatially adaptive nonparametric regression image deblurring. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(10):1469–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ercole C, Foiá A, Katkovnik V, Egiazaria K (2005) Spatio-temporal pointwise adaptive denoising of video: 3d non-parametric regression approach. Workshop on video processing and quality metrics for consumer electronics

  24. Tan X, Sun C, Pham TD (2014) Multipoint filtering with local polynomial approximation and range guidance. In: CVPR ‘14: proceedings of the 2014 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 2941–2948

  25. Misra D, Sarker S, Dhabal S, Ganguly A (2013) Effect of using genetic algorithm to denoise MRI images corrupted with Rician noise. in: 2013 IEEE international conference on emerging trends in computing, communication and nanotechnology (ICECCN 2013), pp 146–151

  26. Liu Y, Ma Y, Liu F, Zhang X, Yang Y (2014) The research based on the genetic algorithm of wavelet image denoising threshold of medicine. J Chem Pharm Res 6:2458–2462

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar M, Mishra SK (2015) Particle swarm optimization-based functional link artificial neural network for medical image denoising. Computational vision and robotics. Springer India, pp 105–111

  28. Boyat AK, Joshi BK (2015) A review paper: noise models in digital image processing. Sig Image Process 6(2):63–75

    Google Scholar 

  29. Foi A, Trimeche M, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K (2008) Practical Poissonian–Gaussian noise modeling and fitting for singleimage raw-data. IEEE Trans Image Process 17(10):1737–1754

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Hasinoff SW, Durand F, Freeman WT (2010) Noise-optimal capture for high dynamic range photography. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 553–560

  31. Dey N, Karâa WB (2015) Biomedical Image analysis and mining techniques for improved health outcomes. Advances in bioinformatics and biomedical engineering (ABBE) book series, 414 p. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8811-7

  32. Dey N, Nandi B, Roy AB, Biswas D, Das A, Chaudhuri S (2013) Analysis of blood cell smears using stationary wavelet transform & harris corner detection. recent advances in computer vision and image processing: methodologies and applications, pp 357–370

  33. N Dey, B Nandi, P Das, A Das, SS Chaudhuri, Retention Of Electrocardiogram Features Insignificantly Devalorized as an Effect of Watermarking for a Multi-Modal Biometric Authentication System. Advances in Biometrics for Secure Human Authentication and Recognition, 1-450 (2013)

  34. Dey N, Samanta S, Yang XS, Chaudhri S, Das A (2013) Optimisation of scaling factors in electrocardiogram signal watermarking using cuckoo search. Int J Bio-Inspir Comput 5(5):315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dey N, Roy A, Pal M, Das A (2012) FCM based blood vessel segmentation method for retinal images. Int J Comput Sci Netw 1(3):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dey N, Pal M, Das A (2012) A session based watermarking technique within the NROI of retinal fundus images for authencation using DWT, spread spectrum and Harris corner detection. Int J Mod Eng Res 2(3):749–757

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roy P, Goswami S, Chakraborty S, Azar AT, Dey N (2014) Image segmentation using rough set theory: a review. Int J Rough Sets Data Anal 1(2):62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nandi D, Ashour AS, Samanta S, Chakraborty S, Salem M, Dey N (2015) Principal component analysis in medical image processing: a study. Int J Image Mining 1(1):65–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ashour AS, Samanta S, Dey N, Kausar N, Karaa WB, Hassanien AE (2015) Computed tomography image enhancement using Cuckoo search: a log transform based approach. J Sig Inform Process 6(4):244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dey N, Das P, Biswas D, Maji P, Das A, Chaudhuri SS (2013) Visible watermarking within the region of non-interest of medical images based on fuzzy C-means and Harris corner detection. The fourth international workshop communications security and information assurance (CSIA-2013), Delhi

  41. Tran G, Shi Y (2015) Fiber orientation and compartment parameter estimation from multi-shell diffusion imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34(11):2320–2332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Samanta S, Dey N, Das P, Acharjee S, Chaudhuri SS (2012) Multilevel threshold based gray scale image segmentation using Cuckoo search. In: International conference on emerging trends in electrical, communication and information technologies-ICECIT

  43. Samanta S, Chakraborty S, Acharjee S, Mukherjee A, Dey N (2013) Solving 0/1 knapsack problem using ant weight lifting algorithm. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and computing research (ICCIC), Madurai

  44. Chakraborty S, Samanta S, Mukherjee A, Dey N, Chaudhuri SS (2013) Particle swarm optimization based parameter optimization technique in medical information hiding. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and computing research (ICCIC), Madurai

  45. Gaber T, Kotyk T, Dey N, Ashour A, Victoria ADC, Hassanien AE, Snasel V (2015) Detection of dead stained microscopic cells based on color intensity and contrast. In: International conference on advanced intelligent systems and informatics. BeniSuef University, BeniSuef

  46. Dey N, Das P, Roy AB, Das A, Chaudhuri SS (2012) Detection and measurement of arc of lumen calcification from intravascular ultrasound using Harris corner detection. In: National conference on computing and communication systems (NCCCS), Durgapur

  47. Dey N, Ashour AS, Beagum S, Sifaki-Pistola D, Gospodinov M, Gospodinova EP, Tavares JMRS (2015) Parameter optimization for local polynomial approximation based intersection confidence interval filter using genetic algorithm: an application for brain MRI image de-noising. J Imaging 1:60–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wand MP, Jones MC (1995) Kernel smoothing. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ashour A, Elkamchouchi H (2007) Enhancement of moving targets tracking performance using the ICI rule. Alex Eng J 46:673–682

    Google Scholar 

  50. Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K, Astola J (2006) Local approximation techniques in signal and image processing. SPIE, Bellingham

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Toledo CFM, Oliveira L, Silva RD, Pedrini H (2013) Image denoising based on genetic algorithm. In: 2013 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), pp 1294–1301

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amira S. Ashour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashour, A.S., Beagum, S., Dey, N. et al. Light microscopy image de-noising using optimized LPA-ICI filter. Neural Comput & Applic 29, 1517–1533 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2678-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2678-9

Keywords

Navigation