Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new denoising method for fMRI based on weighted three-dimensional wavelet transform

  • New Trends in data pre-processing methods for signal and image classification
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a new three-dimensional discrete wavelet transform (3D-DWT)-based denoising method for functional magnetic resonance images (fMRI). This method is called weighted three-dimensional discrete wavelet transform (w-3D-DWT), and it is based on the principle of weighting the volume subbands which are obtained by 3D-DWT. Briefly, classical DWT denoising consists of wavelet decomposition, thresholding, and image reconstruction steps. In the thresholding algorithm, the thresholding value for each image cannot be chosen exclusively. Namely, a specific thresholding value is chosen and it is used for all images. The proposed algorithm in this study can be considered as a data-driven denoising model for fMRI. It consists of three-dimensional wavelet decomposition, subband weighting, and image reconstruction. The purposes of subband weighting algorithm are to increase the effect of the subband which represents the image better and to decrease the effect of the subband which represents the image in the worst way and thus to reduce the noises of the image adaptively. fMRI is one of the popular methods used to understand brain functions which are often corrupted by noises from various sources. The traditional denoising method used in fMRI is smoothing images with a Gaussian kernel. This study suggests an adaptive approach for fMRI filtering different from Gaussian smoothing and 3D-DWT thresholding. In this study, w-3D-DWT denoising results were evaluated with mean-square error (MSE), peak signal/noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity (SSIM) metrics, and the results were compared with Gaussian smoothing and 3D-DWT thresholding methods. According to this comparison, w-3D-DWT gave low-MSE and high-PSNR results for fMRI data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Graph 1
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Onut I V, Ghorbani AA (2004) Classifying cognitive states from fMRI data using neural networks. Ieee. Conf. Neural Networks, Vols 1–4, Proc. 2871–2875\n3302

  2. Billor N, Godwin J (2015) Variable selection for functional logistic regression in fMRI data analysis. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Biostatistics 7(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lindquist MA., Wager TD (2014) Principles of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Handbook of neuroimaging data analysis, London Chapman &Hall, 3–48

  4. Yue YR, Loh JM, Lindquist M (2010) Adaptive spatial smoothing of fMRI images. Stat Interface 3:3–13

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Khullar S, Michael A, Correa N, Adali T, Baum SA, Calhoun VD (2011) Wavelet-based fMRI analysis: 3-D denoising, signal separation, and validation metrics. NeuroImage 54:2867–2884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wink AM, Roerdink JBTM (2004) Denoising functional MR images: a comparison of wavelet denoising and Gaussian smoothing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(3):374–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang X, Fei B (2011) A wavelet multiscale denoising algorithm for magnetic resonance (MR) images. Meas Sci Technol 22(2):025803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Donoho DL, Johnstone JM (1994) Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81(3):425–455

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Che X, Ma S (2012) Nonlinear filtering based on 3D wavelet transform for MRI denoising. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2012:40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kadah YM, Member S (2004) Adaptive denoising of event-related functional using spectral subtraction. 51, 1944–1953

  11. Tabelow K, Polzehl J, Voss HU, Spokoiny V (2006) Analyzing fMRI experiments with structural adaptive smoothing procedures. NeuroImage 33:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Monir SMG, Siyal MY (2009) Denoising functional magnetic resonance imaging time-series using anisotropic spatial averaging. Biomed Signal Process Control 4:16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital image processing, Prentice Hall Inc., 349–408

  14. Prochazka A, Grafova L, Vysata O (2011) Three-dimensional wavelet transform in multidimensional biomedical volume processing. Proc. of the IASTED Int. Conf. Graphics and Virtual Reality, Cambridge, UK

  15. Yavariabdi A, Bartoli A (2011) 3D medical image enhancement based on wavelet transforms. ALCOV-ISIT Fr. 3–7

  16. Brammer MJ (2008) Multidimensional wavelet analysis of functional magnetic resonance images. 18, 773–778

  17. Gibbs P, Buckley DL, BlackbandSJ HA (1996) Tumour volume determination from MR images by morphological segmentation. Phys Med Biol 41:2437–2446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Materka A, Strzelecki M (1998) Texture analysis methods—a review. Methods 11:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  19. Skea J, Anderson D, GreenT GR, Heptonstall P, Leach M (2008) Intermittent renewable generation and maintaining power system reliability. IET generation, transmission & distribution 2(1):82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Panda R, Khobragade PS, Jambhule PD, Jengthe SN, Pal PR, Gandhi TK (2010) Classification of EEG signal using wavelet transform and support vector machine for epileptic seizure diction. 2010 Int. Conf. Syst. Med. Biol. 405–408

  21. Sidhu KS, Khaira BS, Virk IS (2012) Medical image denoising in the wavelet domain using haar and db3 filtering International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science 1.1, 001–008. 1, 1–8

  22. Rees G, Friston K, Single subject epoch (block) auditory fMRI activation data. http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/data/ Accessed 10 Oct 2016

  23. Hu J, Pu Y, Wu X, Zhang Y, Zhou J (2012) Improved DCT-based nonlocal means filter for MR images denoising Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

  24. Wink AM, Roerdink JBTM (2006) BOLD noise assumptions in fMRI International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

  25. Burrell LS (2008) Feature analysis of functional MRI data for mapping epileptic networks Feature Analysis Proquest. 36–37

  26. Kong H (2010) A Bayesian model selection approach to fMRI activation detection Abd-Krim Seghouane and Ju Lynn Ong National ICT Australia, Canberra Research Laboratory The Australian National University, College of Engineering and Computer Science. Analysis. 4401–440

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey

    Güzin Özmen

  2. Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey

    Seral Özşen

Authors
  1. Güzin Özmen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seral Özşen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Güzin Özmen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özmen, G., Özşen, S. A new denoising method for fMRI based on weighted three-dimensional wavelet transform. Neural Comput & Applic 29, 263–276 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2995-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2995-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation