Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical modelling for pulsatile flow of Casson fluid along with magnetic nanoparticles in a stenosed artery under external magnetic field and body acceleration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper, the magnetohydrodynamics effects on flow parameters of blood carrying magnetic nanoparticles flowing through a stenosed artery under the influence of periodic body acceleration are investigated. Blood is assumed to behave as a Casson fluid. The governing equations are nonlinear and solved numerically using finite difference schemes. The effects of stenotic height, yield stress, magnetic field, particle concentration and mass parameters on wall shear stress, flow resistance and velocity distribution are analysed. It is found that wall shear stress and flow resistance values are considerably enhanced when an external magnetic field is applied. The velocity values of fluid and particles are appreciably reduced when a magnetic field is applied on the model. It is significant to note that the presence of nanoparticles, magnetic field and yield stress tend to increase the plug core radius. Increased wall shear stress and flow resistance affects the circulation of blood in the human cardiovascular system. The results obtained from the study can be used in normalizing the values of the model parameters and hence can be used for medical applications. The presence of magnetic field helps to slow down the flow of fluid and magnetic particles associated with it. The magnetic particles of nanosize developed in recent days are biodegradable and used in biomedical applications. Biomagnetic principles and biomagnetic particles as drug carriers are used in cancer treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Young DF (1968) Effects of a time-dependent stenosis on flow through a tube. J Eng Ind Trans ASME 90:248–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Young DF, Tsai FY (1973) Flow characteristic in models of arterial stenosis-I. Steady flow. J Biomech 6:395–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ponalagusamy R (1986) Blood flow through Stenosed tube, Ph.D Thesis, IIT, Bombay

  4. Young DF (1979) Fluid mechanics of arterial stenosis. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 101:157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caro CG (1981) Arterial fluid mechanics and atherogenesis, recent advances. Cardiovasc Dis 2(Supplement):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ku DN (1997) Blood flow in arteries. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 29:399

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar S, Kumar S, Kumar D (2009) Oscillatory MHD flow of blood through an artery with mild stenosis. IJE Trans A Basics 22:125–130

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramzan M, Bilal M, Chung JD (2016) Effects of MHD homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions on third grade fluid flow with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux. J Mol Liq 223:1284–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramzan M, Bilal M, Chung JD (2017) MHD stagnation point Cattaneo–Christov heat flux in Williamson fluid flow with homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions and convective boundary condition A numerical approach. J Mol Liq 225:856–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen QD, Boger DV (1992) Measuring the flow properties of yield stress fluids. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 24:47

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodkiewicz CM, Sinha P, Kennedy JS (1990) On the application of a constitutive equation for whole human blood. Trans ASME 112:198–206

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scott Blair GW (1959) An equation of blood plasma flow and serum through glass capillaries. Nature 183:p613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Charm SE, Kurland GS (1965) Viscometry of human blood for shear rate of 0 100,000 sec\(^{-1}\). Nature 206:p617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Merill EW, Benis AM, Gilliland ER, Sherwood TK, Salzman EW (1965) Pressure-flow relations of human blood in hollow fibers at low flow rates. J Appl Physiol 20:p954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blair GWS, Spanner DC (1974) An introduction to biorheology. Elsevier Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Siddiqui SU, Verma NK, Mishra S, Gupta RS (2009) Mathematical modelling of pulsatile flow of Casson’s fluid in arterial stenosis. Appl Math Comput 210:1–10

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaturani P, Ponnalagarsamy R (1986) Pulsatile flow of a Casson fluid through stenosed arteries with applications to blood flow. Biorheology 23:499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bali R, Awasthi U (2012) A Casson fluid model for multiple stenosed artery in the presence of magnetic field. Appl Math 3(5):436–441

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Akbar NS (2015) Influence of magnetic field on peristaltic flow of a Casson fluid in an asymmetric channel: applications in crude oil refinement. J Magn Magn Mater 378:463–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramzan M, Farooq M, Hayat T, Chung JD (2016) Radiative and Joule heating effects in the MHD flow of a micropolar fluid with partial slip and convective boundary condition. J Mol Liq 221:394–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dash RK, Mehta KN (1996) Casson fluid in a pipe filled with a homogeneous porous medium. Int J Eng Sci 34(10):1145–1156

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chaturani P, Palanisamy V (1990) Casson fluid model for pulsatile flow of blood under periodic body acceleration. Biorheology 27(5):619–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shyy W, narayanan R (1999) Fluid dynamics at interfaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Shaylgin AN, Norina SB, Kondorsky EI (1983) Behaviour of erythrocytes in high gradient magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 31:555–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Takeuchi T, Mizuno A, Yamagishi T, HigashiDate M (1995) Orientation of red blood cells in high magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 140–144:1462–1463

  26. Higashi T, Ashida N, Takeuchi T (1997) Orientation of blood cells in static magnetic field. Phys B 237–238:616–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Haik Y, Pai V, Chen CJ (1999) Biomagnetic fluid dynamics at interfaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Haik Y, Pai V, Chen CJ (2001) Apparent viscosity of human blood in a high static magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 225:180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sud VK, Sekhon GS (1989) Blood flow through the human arterial system in the presence of a steady magnetic field. Phys Med Biol 34:795–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma S, Singh U, Katiyar VK (2015) Magnetic field effect on flow parameters of blood along with magnetic particles in a cylindrical tube. J Magn Magn Mater 377:395–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. El-Shahed M (2003) Pulsatile flow of blood through a stenosed porous medium under periodic body acceleration. Appl Math Comput 138:479–488

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Tzirtzilakis EE (2005) A mathematical model for blood flow in magnetic field. Phys Fluids 17:077103

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang Y, Reynolds C, Xiao C, Feng W, Zhou Z, Rodriguez W, Tyagi SC, Eaton JW, Saari JT, Kang YJ (2007) Dietary copper supplementation reverses hypertrophic cardiomyopathy induced by chronic pressure overload in mice. J Exp Med 204:657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramzan M, Inam S, Shehzad SA (2016) Three dimensional boundary layer flow of a viscoelastic nanofluid with Soret and Dufour effects. Alex Eng J 55:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramzan M (2016) Influence of Newtonian heating on three dimensional MHD flow of couple stress nanofluid with viscous dissipation and joule heating. J Mol Liq 223:1284–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ellahi R, Rahman SU, Nadeem S, Akbar NS (2014) Blood flow of nano fluid through an artery with composite stenosis and permeable walls. Appl Nanosci 4:919–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gentile F, Ferrari M, Decuzzi P (2007) The transport of nanoparticles in blood vessels, the effect of vessel permeability and blood rheology. Ann Biomed Eng 36:254–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sharma S, Katiyar VK, Singh U (2015) Mathematical modelling for trajectories of magnetic nanoparticles in a blood vessel under magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 379:102–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nadeem S, Ijaz S (2014) Nanoparticles analysis on the blood flow through a tapered catheterized elastic artery with overlapping stenosis. Eur Phys J Plus. doi:10.1140/epjp/i2014-14249-1

  40. Aman S, Khan I, Ismail Z, Salleh MZ (2016) Impacts of gold nanoparticles on MHD mixed convection Poiseuille flow of nanofluid passing through a porous medium in the presence of thermal radiation, thermal diffusion and chemical reaction. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2688-7

  41. Furlani EP, Furlani EP (2007) A model for predicting magnetic targeting of multifunctional particles in the microvasculature. J Magn Magn Mater 312:187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Womersley JR (1955) Oscillatory motion of a viscous liquid in a thin-walled elastic tube-I: the linear approximation for long waves. Phil Mag 46:199–219

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Chaturani P, Palanisamy V (1990) Pulsatile flow of power-law fluid model for blood flow under periodic body acceleration. Biorheology 27(5):747–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chaturani P, Palanisamy V (1991) Pulsatile flow of blood with periodic body acceleration. Int J Eng Sci 29(1):113–121

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Akbarzadeh P (2016) Pulsatile magneto-hydrodynamic blood flows through porous blood vessels using a third grade non-Newtonian fluids model. Comput Meth Prog Biomedicine 126:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Srivastava VP, Rastogi R (2010) Blood flow through a stenosed catheterized artery: effects of hematocrit and stenosis shape. Comput Math Appl 59:1377–1385

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Nacev A, Beni C, Bruno O, Shapiro B (2011) The behaviors of ferromagnetic nano-particles in and around blood vessels under applied magnetic fields. J Magn Magn Mater 323:651–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mekheimer KS, Kot MAEI (2008) Influence of magnetic field and hall currents on blood flow through a stenotic artery. Appl Math Mech Engl Ed 29(8):1093–1104

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Shaw S, Murthy PVSN, Pradhan SC (2010) The effect of body acceleration on two dimensional flow of Casson fluid through an artery with asymmetric stenosis. Open Transport Phenom J 2:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

One of the authors Ms. S. Priyadharshini is thankful to the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), the Government of India, for the grant of research fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Priyadharshini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors do not have any conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Appendix

Appendix

The continuity and momentum equations governing the pulsatile flow of Casson fluid through stenosed artery with the influence of magnetic field and periodic body acceleration may be written as

$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{\partial \bar{v}_f}{\partial \bar{r}}+\frac{\bar{v}_f}{\bar{r}}+\frac{\partial \bar{u}_f}{\partial \bar{z}} = 0 \end{aligned}$$
(35)
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{\partial \bar{u}_f}{\partial \bar{t}}+\bar{v}_f \frac{\partial \bar{u}_f}{\partial \bar{r}}+\bar{u}_f\frac{\partial \bar{u}_f}{\partial \bar{z}} = -\frac{1}{\bar{\rho }_f}\frac{\partial \bar{p}}{\partial \bar{z}}\nonumber \\&\quad -\frac{1}{\bar{\rho }_f}\left[ \frac{1}{\bar{r}}\frac{\partial }{\partial \bar{r}}(\bar{r}\bar{\tau }_{rz})+\frac{\partial }{\partial \bar{z}}(\bar{\tau }_{zz})\right] +\frac{1}{\bar{\rho }_f} \bar{K}\bar{N}\left( \bar{u}_p-\bar{u}_f\right) -\frac{\bar{\sigma }\bar{B}_0^2\bar{u}_f}{\bar{\rho }_f}+\bar{F}(\bar{t}) \end{aligned}$$
(36)
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{\partial \bar{v}_f}{\partial \bar{t}}+\bar{v}_f\frac{\partial \bar{v}_f}{\partial \bar{r}}+\bar{u}_f\frac{\partial \bar{v}_f}{\partial \bar{z}} = -\frac{1}{\bar{\rho }_f}\frac{\partial \bar{p}}{\partial \bar{r}}\nonumber \\&\quad -\frac{1}{\bar{\rho }_f}\left[ \frac{1}{\bar{r}}\frac{\partial }{\partial \bar{r}}(\bar{r}\bar{\tau }_{rr})+\frac{\partial }{\partial \bar{z}}(\bar{\tau }_{rz})\right] +\frac{1}{\bar{\rho }_f} \bar{K}\bar{N}\left( \bar{v}_p-\bar{v}_f\right) \end{aligned}$$
(37)

where \(\bar{u}_f\) and \(\bar{v}_f\) are the axial and radial components of fluid velocity, respectively, \(\bar{\rho }_f\) is the density of fluid, \(\bar{p}\) is the pressure, \(\bar{K}\) denotes the Stoke’s constant, \(\bar{N}\) represents the number of nanoparticles per unit volume, \(\bar{u}_p\) and \(\bar{v}_p\) are the axial and radial components of particle velocity, respectively, \(\bar{\sigma }\) is the electrical conductivity, \(\bar{B_0}\) is the strength of external magnetic field and the body acceleration is expressed as \(\bar{F}(\bar{t}) = \bar{A} \cos (\bar{\omega _b}\bar{t}+\phi )\), \(\bar{A}\) is the amplitude of body acceleration, \(\phi\) is the phase lag and \(\bar{\omega }_b = 2\pi \bar{f}_b\), \(\bar{f}_b\) is the frequency of body acceleration which is assumed to be small and hence the wave effects can be neglected.

The pulsatile pressure gradient acting on the fluid is expressed as \(-\frac{\partial \bar{p}}{\partial \bar{z}} = \bar{A}_0+\bar{A}_1 \cos (\bar{\omega }_p\bar{t})\), where \(\bar{A}_0\) and \(\bar{A}_1\) are the constant amplitudes of steady-state and pulsatile pressure gradients, respectively, \(\bar{\omega }_p\) is the angular frequency and is given by \(\bar{\omega }_p = 2\pi \bar{f}_p\), \(\bar{f}_p\) being the frequency of heart pulse.

The stress components for the rheology of Casson fluid are given by

$$\begin{aligned} \bar{\tau }_{zz}= 2\bar{\mu }(\bar{J}_2)\left( \frac{\partial \bar{u}_f}{\partial \bar{z}}\right) , \end{aligned}$$
(38)
$$\begin{aligned} \bar{\tau }_{rr}= 2\bar{\mu }(\bar{J}_2)\left( \frac{\partial \bar{v}_f}{\partial \bar{r}}\right) , \end{aligned}$$
(39)
$$\begin{aligned} \bar{\tau }_{rz}= \bar{\mu }(\bar{J}_2)\left( \frac{\partial \bar{u}_f}{\partial \bar{r}}+\frac{\partial \bar{v}_f}{\partial \bar{z}}\right) , \end{aligned}$$
(40)
$$\begin{aligned} \bar{\mu }(\bar{J}_2)= (\bar{\mu }_c^{\frac{1}{2}}\bar{J}_2^{\frac{1}{4}}+2^{-\frac{1}{2}}\bar{\tau _y}^{\frac{1}{2}})^2 \bar{J}_2^{-\frac{1}{2}}, \end{aligned}$$
(41)
$$\begin{aligned} \bar{J_2}= 2\left\{ \left( \frac{\partial \bar{v}_f}{\partial \bar{r}}\right) ^2 + \left( \frac{\bar{v}_f}{\bar{r}}\right) ^2 + \left( \frac{\partial \bar{u}_f}{\partial \bar{z}}\right) ^2\right\} +\left( \frac{\partial \bar{v}_f}{\partial \bar{z}}+\frac{\partial \bar{u}_f}{\partial \bar{r}}\right) ^2, \end{aligned}$$
(42)

where \(\bar{\mu }(\bar{J}_2)\) is the apparent viscosity, \(\bar{\tau _y}\) is the yield stress and \(\bar{\mu _c}\) is Casson viscosity (\('-'\) over the letter denotes the corresponding dimensional quantity).

Using non-dimensionalization defined in (5), the governing equations in dimensionless form are

$$\begin{aligned}&\delta _s\left( \frac{\partial v_f}{\partial r}+\frac{v_f}{r}\right) +\frac{\partial u_f}{\partial z} = 0 \end{aligned}$$
(43)
$$\begin{aligned}&\alpha ^2\frac{\partial u_f}{\partial t}+Re\left[ \delta _sv_f\frac{\partial u_f}{\partial r}+u_f\frac{\partial u_f}{\partial z}\right] = -\frac{\partial p}{\partial z}-\left[ \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial }{\partial r}(r\tau _{rz})+\frac{\partial \tau _{zz}}{\partial z}\right] \nonumber \\&\quad +R_1(u_p-u_f)-M^2u_f+F(t) \end{aligned}$$
(44)
$$\begin{aligned}\delta _s\alpha ^2 \frac{\partial v_f}{\partial t}+Re\left[ \delta _s^2 v_f\frac{\partial v_f}{\partial r}+ \delta _s u_f \frac{\partial v_f}{\partial z}\right] &= -\frac{\partial p}{\partial r}-\left[ \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial }{\partial r}(r\tau _{rr})+\frac{\partial \tau _{rz}}{\partial z}\right] \nonumber \\&\quad +\,\delta _s R_1(v_p-v_f) \end{aligned}$$
(45)

and the dimensionless stress components are

$$\begin{aligned} \tau _{zz}= 2\mu (J_2)\frac{\partial u_f}{\partial z} \end{aligned}$$
(46)
$$\begin{aligned} \tau _{rr}= 2\mu (J_2)\delta _s \frac{\partial v_f}{\partial r} \end{aligned}$$
(47)
$$\begin{aligned} \tau _{rz}= \mu (J_2)\left( \frac{\partial u_f}{\partial r}+\delta _s \frac{\partial v_f}{\partial z}\right) \end{aligned}$$
(48)
$$\begin{aligned} \mu (J_2)= \left( J_2^{1/4}+2^{-1/2}\tau _y^{1/2}\right) ^2 J_2^{-1/2} \end{aligned}$$
(49)
$$\begin{aligned} J_2= 2\left\{ \delta _s \left[ \left( \frac{\partial v_f}{\partial r}\right) ^2+\left( \frac{v_f}{r}\right) ^2\right] +\left( \frac{\partial u_f}{\partial z}\right) ^2\right\} +\left[ \delta _s \frac{\partial v_f}{\partial z}+\frac{\partial u_f}{\partial r}\right] ^2 \end{aligned}$$
(50)

During the initial development of stenosis (mild stenosis), which means only minimal narrowing of the arterial lumen \(\delta _s = (\frac{\bar{\delta }_s}{\bar{R}_0})<<1\), then from (43), \(\frac{\partial u_f}{\partial z}<<1\). If \(Re \delta _s<<1\),then from (44), it is significant to note that the effects of convective part (inertial terms) are smaller when compared with viscous terms and the radial velocity is negligibly small compared to the axial velocity. Equation (45) indicates that \(\frac{\partial p}{\partial r}<<\frac{\partial p}{\partial z}\) and the variation of pressure along r-direction is negligibly small and can be neglected. Further, the radius of lumen is very small compared to the wavelength of pressure wave, the equation of motion in the radial direction is reduced to \(\frac{\partial p}{\partial r} = 0\). For more details, refer [1, 3, 40, 49].

Using the assumptions and simplifications discussed in Ponalagusamy [3], Mekheimer and EI Kot [48], the appropriate momentum equations describing the pulsatile flow of Casson fluid through stenosed artery in the presence of periodic body acceleration under constant magnetic field in the case of a mild stenosis (\(\delta _s<< 1\)) along with the conditions (Young [1], \(\delta _s Re<< 1\)) are given by

$$\begin{aligned}&\alpha ^2 \frac{\partial u_f}{\partial t} = -\frac{\partial p}{\partial z}-\left[ \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial }{\partial r}(r\tau )\right] +R_1(u_p-u_f)-M^2u_f+F(t) \end{aligned}$$
(51)
$$\begin{aligned}&-\frac{\partial p}{\partial r} = 0 \end{aligned}$$
(52)

\(\tau\) is the shear stress and

$$\begin{aligned} \tau ^{\frac{1}{2}}= \theta _1^{\frac{1}{2}} + {\left( \frac{\partial u_f}{\partial r}\right) }^{\frac{1}{2}}, \tau \ge \theta _1 \end{aligned}$$
(53)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial u_f}{\partial r}= 0, \tau < \theta _1 \end{aligned}$$
(54)

where \(\theta _1 = \frac{\bar{R}_0\bar{\tau }_y}{\bar{u}_0\bar{\mu }_c}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Priyadharshini, S., Ponalagusamy, R. Mathematical modelling for pulsatile flow of Casson fluid along with magnetic nanoparticles in a stenosed artery under external magnetic field and body acceleration. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 813–826 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3111-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3111-8

Keywords