Skip to main content
Log in

Intelligent supervision approach based on multilayer neural PCA and nonlinear gain scheduling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is mainly aimed at developing an off-line supervision approach geared to complex processes. This approach consists of two parts: the first part is the fault detection and isolation and the second one is the process control. The first part is devoted to the implementation of the multilayer neural PCA which combines the advantage of data reduction provided by the principal component analysis and the power of neural network linearization. The transition to control is conditioned by the absence of faults in the process; if there is a defect, it must be isolated by identifying the defected variables. The second part rests on the combination of two control tools: both the gain scheduling and the feedback linearization yield a new approach called nonlinear gain scheduling. To have our work validated, we applied it to a photovoltaic system and it gave effective results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hwang I et al (2010) A survey of fault detection, isolation, and reconfiguration methods. IEEE Trans Control 18(3):636–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaouch H, Ouni K (2016) Exploiting neural PCA and fisher discriminate analysis for FDI system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:1183–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaouch H, Ouni K, Nabli L (2016) Multi-variable process data compression and defect isolation using wavelet PCA and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-9774-y

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alwi H, et al. (2011) Fault detection and fault-tolerant control using sliding modes. In: Advances in industrial control. Springer, chapter 2, pp 7–27

  5. Jiang L (2011) Sensor fault detection and isolation using system dynamics identification techniques. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Michigan

  6. Liu X et al (2011) Application of nonlinear PCA for fault detection in polymer extrusion processes. Sch Electron Electr Eng Comput Sci 6(5):1141–1148

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taouali O et al (2015) New fault detection method based on reduced kernel principal component analysis (RKPCA). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Y et al (2014) Online fault detection and fault tolerance in electrical energy storage systems. In: IEEE conference publications, pp 1–5

  9. He Z et al (2010) Fault detection and classification in EHV transmission line based on wavelet singular entropy. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 25(4):2156–2163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanwani A, Dominguez-Garcia AD, Liberzon D (2011) An inversion based approach to fault detection and isolation in switching electrical networks. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 19(5):1059–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salehi R, Vossoughi G, Alasty A (2015) A second-order sliding mode observer for fault detection and isolation of turbocharged SI engines. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(12):7795–7803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alwi H et al (2011) Fault tolerant control and fault detection and isolation. In: Chapter 2, Part of the series advances in industrial control, pp 7–27

  13. Samy I, Gu D-W (2014) Fault detection and isolation (FDI). In: Fault detection and flight data measurement (lecture notes in control and information sciences), pp 5–17

  14. Gonzalez R, Huang B, Lau E (2015) Process monitoring using kernel density estimation and Bayesian networking with an industrial case study. ISA Trans 58:330–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou J et al (2014) Fault detection and identification spanning multiple processes by integrating PCA with neural network. Sci Dir Appl Soft Comput A 14:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou B et al (2014) Gain scheduled control of linear systems subject to actuator saturation with application to space craft rendezvous. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 22(5):2031–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. White A, Zhu G, Choi J (2011) Hardware-in-the-loop simulation of robust gain-scheduling control of port-fuel-injection processes. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 19(6):1433–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ku C-C et al (2015) Gain-scheduled controller design for discrete-time linear parameter varying systems with multiplicative noises. Int J Control Autom Syst 13(6):1382–1390

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwon H-Y, Choi H-L (2014) Gain scheduling control of nonlinear systems based on approximate input–output linearization. Int J Control Autom Syst 12(5):1131–1137

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang W et al (2012) Two-state dynamic gain scheduling control applied to an F16 aircraft model. Int J Non Linear Mech 47(10):1116–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Veselý V et al (2015) Design of robust gain-scheduled PI controllers. J Frankl Inst 352(4):1476–1494

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Arif J, Ray S, Chaudhuri B (2014) Multivariable self-tuning feedback linearization controller for power oscillation damping. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 22(4):1519–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Angue Mintsa H et al (2012) Feedback linearization-based position control of an electrohydraulic servo system with supply pressure uncertainty. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 20(4):1092–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Y, Tao G, Chen M (2015) Relative degrees and adaptive feedback linearization control of T–S Fuzzy systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(6):2215–2230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Krener AJ (2014) Feedback linearization of nonlinear systems. In: Encyclopedia of systems and control (living reference work entry). Springer, pp 1–14

  26. Venkat V et al (2003) A review of process fault detection and diagnosis, part III: process history based methods. Comput Chem Eng 27:327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Luo M (2006) Data-driven fault detection using trending analysis. Ph.D., M.S., Tennessee Tech, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge

  28. Venkat V, Rengaswamy R, Kavuri SN (2003) A review of process fault detection and diagnosis, part II: qualitative models and search strategies. Comput Chem Eng 27:313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pedro I, Dahunsi O (2011) Neural network based feedback linearization control of a servo-hydraulic vehicle suspension system. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 21(1):137–147

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Tehrani ES, Khorasani K (2009) Fault diagnosis of nonlinear systems using a hybrid approach. Springer, Dordrecht

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Jerbi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaouch, H., Charfedine, S., Ouni, K. et al. Intelligent supervision approach based on multilayer neural PCA and nonlinear gain scheduling. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 1153–1163 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3147-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3147-9

Keywords

Navigation