Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An efficient simulation–neural network–genetic algorithm for flexible flow shops with sequence-dependent setup times, job deterioration and learning effects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents an integrated approach based on artificial neural network (ANN), genetic algorithm (GA) and computer simulation to explore all the solution space in stochastic flexible flow shop with sequence-dependent setup times, job deterioration and learning effects. The objective of this study is minimizing total tardiness of jobs in the sequences. In this study, the outputs of ANN are inputted to GA and outputs of simulation model are inputted to ANN. We consider learning effects in this problem which means that workers become more experienced with the passage of time, and thus, the processing duration decreases. Deterioration of job means that processing time is a decreasing function of its execution start time. It is not possible to propose a mathematical optimization model for the stated problem; therefore, a simulation optimization approach based on ANN–GA is introduced for a relatively large problem. Finally, actual experiments are conducted to show the applicability of the proposed novel algorithm in finding near-optimal solutions with normal, uniform and exponential processing and setup times. This is the first study that presents an integrated intelligent approach for optimal solution of stochastic flexible flow shop problem with sequence-dependent setup times, job deterioration and learning effects in a real case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Yaurima V, Burtseva L, Tchernykh A (2009) Hybrid flow shop with unrelated machines, sequence-dependent setup time, availability constraints and limited buffers. Comput Ind Eng 56:1452–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koulamas C, Kyparisis GJ (2000) Asymptotically optimal linear time algorithms for two-stage and three-stage flexible flow shops. Nav Res Logist (NRL) 47(3):259–268

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Jungwatanakit J, Reodecha M, Chaovalitwongse P, Werner F (2008) Algorithms for flexible flow shop problems with unrelated parallel machines, setup times, and dual criteria. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:354–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Iranpoor M, Ghomi SF, Zandieh M (2012) Machine scheduling in the presence of sequence-dependent setup times and a rate-modifying activity. Int J Prod Res 50(24):7401–7414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kononov A, Gawiejnowicz S (2001) NP-hard cases in scheduling deteriorating jobs on dedicated machines. J Oper Res Soc 52:708–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dawande M, Gavirneni S, Rachamadugu R (2006) Scheduling a two-stage flowshop under makespan constraint. Math Comput Model 44:73–84

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Vahedi Nouri B, Fattahi P, Ramezanian R (2013) Hybrid firefly-simulated annealing algorithm for the flow shop problem with learning effects and flexible maintenance activities. Int J Prod Res 51(12):3501–3515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ng CT, Wang JB, Cheng TCE, Liu LL (2010) A branch-and-bound algorithm for solving a two-machine flow shop problem with deteriorating jobs. Comput Oper Res 37:83–90

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Azizoglu M, Cakmak E, Kondakci S (2001) A flexible flow shop problem with total flow time minimization. Eur J Oper Res 132:528–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Z, Xing W, Bai F (2005) No-wait flexible flow shop scheduling with no-idle machines. Oper Res Lett 33:609–614

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Pan QK, Wang L, Qian B (2008) A novel multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for no-wait flow shop scheduling problems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 222(4):519–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akrami B, Karimi B, Moattar Hosseini SM (2006) Two metaheuristic methods for the common cycle economic lot sizing and scheduling in flexible flow shops with limited intermediate buffers: the finite horizon case. Appl Math Comput 183:634–645

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Khalouli S, Ghedjati F, Hamzaoui A (2010) A meta-heuristic approach to solve a JIT scheduling problem in hybrid. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23:765–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee WC, Wu CC, Liu MF (2009) A single-machine bi-criterion learning scheduling problem with release times. Expert Syst Appl 36:10295–10303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lai TC, Sotskov YN, Werner F (1997) Optimal make span scheduling with given bounds of processing times. Math Comput Model 26:67–86

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai TC, Sotskov YN (1999) Sequencing with uncertain numerical data for make span minimization. J Oper Res Soc 50:230–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Allahverdi A, Sotskov YN (2003) Two-machine flow shop minimum length scheduling problem with random and bounded processing times. Int Trans Oper Res 10:65–76

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsveichuk NM, Sotskov YN, Egorova NG, Lai TC (2009) Schedule execution for two-machine flow-shop with interval processing times. Math Comput Model 49:991–1011

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Allahverdi A (2006) Two-machine flow shop scheduling problem to minimize total completion time with bounded setup and processing times. Int J Prod Econ 103:386–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Almeder C, Hartl RF (2013) A metaheuristic optimization approach for a real-world stochastic flexible flow shop problem with limited buffer. Int J Prod Econ 145:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang K, Choi SH (2014) A holonic approach to flexible flow shop scheduling under stochastic processing times. Comput Oper Res 43:157–168

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Kianfar K, Fatemi Ghomi SMT, Oroojlooy Jadid A (2012) Study of stochastic sequence-dependent flexible flow shop via developing a dispatching rule and a hybrid GA. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25:494–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Honkomp SJ, Mockus L, Reklaitis GV (1999) A framework for schedule evaluation with processing uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng 23:595–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khademi Zare H, Fakhrzad MB (2011) Solving flexible flow-shop problem with a hybrid genetic algorithm and data mining: a fuzzy approach. Expert Syst Appl 38:7609–7615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Azadeh A, Hosseini N, Abdolhossein Zadeh S, Jalalvand F (2015) A hybrid computer simulation-adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system algorithm for optimization of dispatching rule selection in job shop scheduling problems under uncertainty. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rezaeian J, Javadian N, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Jolai F (2011) A hybrid approach based on the genetic algorithm and neural network to design an incremental cellular manufacturing system. Appl Soft Comput 11(6):4195–4202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gourgand M, Grangeon N, Norre S (2003) A contribution to the stochastic flow shop scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 151:415–433

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Zandieh M, Fatemi Ghomi SMT, Moattar Husseini SM (2006) An immune algorithm approach to hybrid flow shops scheduling with sequence-dependent setup times. Appl Math Comput 180:111–127

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Browne S, Yechiali U (1990) Scheduling deteriorating jobs on a single processor. Oper Res 38:495–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang JB, Huang X, Wang XY, Yin N, Wang LY (2009) Learning effect and deteriorating jobs in the single machine scheduling problems. Appl Math Model 33:3848–3853

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang DL, Kuo WH (2011) Scheduling with deteriorating jobs and learning effects. Appl Math Comput 218:2069–2073

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Low C, Lin WY (2013) Some scheduling problems with time-dependent learning effect and deteriorating jobs. Appl Math Model 37:8865–8875

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang XY, Wang JJ (2014) Scheduling deteriorating jobs with a learning effect on unrelated parallel machines. Appl Math Model 38:5231–5238

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Sabuncuoglu L, Gurgun B (1996) A neural network model for scheduling problems. Eur J Oper Res 93:288–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Akyol DE (2004) Application of neural networks to heuristic scheduling algorithms. Comput Ind Eng 46:679–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chiang T (2009) The minimum-cost PD process planning and control methodology with the consideration of resource/time constraints and skill levels. Concur Eng Res Appl 17:257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Asadzadeh SM, Azadeh A, Ziaeifar A (2011) A neuro-fuzzy-regression algorithm for improved prediction of manufacturing lead time with machine breakdowns. Concur Eng Res Appl 19:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Seidgar H, Zandieh M, Fazlollahtabar H, Mahdavi I (2015) Simulated imperialist competitive algorithm in two-stage assembly flow shop with machine breakdowns and preventive maintenance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 230:934–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Figielska E (2009) A genetic algorithm and a simulated annealing algorithm combined with column generation technique for solving the problem of scheduling in the hybrid flow shop with additional resources. Comput Ind Eng 56:142–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Behnamian J, Fatemi Ghomi SMT (2011) Hybrid flowshop scheduling with machine and resource-dependent processing times. Appl Math Model 35:1107–1123

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Xie J, Wang X (2005) Complexity and algorithms for two-stage flexible flow shop scheduling with availability constraints. Comput Math Appl 50:1629–1638

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Gong H, Tang L (2008) A two-stage flexible flow shop problem with deterioration. Comput Comb Lect Notes Comput Sci 5092:651–660

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Kurz ME, Askin RG (2004) Scheduling flexible flow lines with sequence-dependent setup times. Eur J Oper Res 159:66–82

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee WC (2004) A note on deteriorating jobs and learning in single-machine scheduling problems. Int J Bus Econ 3:83–89

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wang JB (2006) A note on scheduling problems with learning effect and deteriorating jobs. Int J Syst Sci 37(12):827–833

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang DL, Kuo WH (2010) Some scheduling problems with deteriorating jobs and learning effects. Comput Ind Eng 58(1):25–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pristker AB, O’Reilly JJ, Laval DK (1999) Simulation with visual Slam and AweSim. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  48. Azadeh A, Faiz ZS (2011) A meta-heuristic framework for forecasting household electricity consumption. Appl Soft Comput 11(1):614–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim HJ, Shin KS (2007) A hybrid approach based on neural networks and genetic algorithms for detecting temporal patterns in stock markets. Appl Soft Comput 7(2):569–576

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Azadeh A, Saberi M, Tavakkoli Moghaddama R, Javanmardi L (2011) An integrated data envelopment analysis-artificial neural network-rough set algorithm for assessment of personnel efficiency. Expert Syst Appl 38:1364–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tseng LY, Lin YT (2010) A hybrid genetic algorithm for no-wait flow shop scheduling problem. Int J Prod Econ 128:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kaushik B, Banka H (2015) Performance evaluation of approximated artificial neural network (AANN) algorithm for reliability improvement. Appl Soft Comput 26:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Gupta JND, Hennig K, Werner F (2002) Local search heuristics for two-stage flow shop problems with secondary criterion. Comput Oper Res 29:123–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chang HC, Liu TK (2015) Optimisation of distributed manufacturing flexible job shop scheduling by using hybrid genetic algorithms. J Intell Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1084-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sule DR (1997) Industrial scheduling. PWS Publishing Company, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from University of Tehran (Grant No. 8106013/1/11). The authors are grateful for the support provided by the College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Center of Excellence for Intelligent Based Experimental Mechanic, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    A. Azadeh, M. Hasannia Kolaee & S. Jebreili

  2. Department of Engineering Research, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    A. Azadeh, M. Hasannia Kolaee & S. Jebreili

  3. Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    A. Hasani Goodarzi

Authors
  1. A. Azadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Hasani Goodarzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Hasannia Kolaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Jebreili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hasani Goodarzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

Data generations in normal and uniform distribution are indicated in following tables (Tables 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). For exponential distribution mean of times is reverse of mean in normal distribution. Some figures of proposed ANN–GA are depicted in this section. Predicted and actual values are shown in Figs. 9, 10, 11 and 12.

Table 6 Mean of processing times of each job with normal distribution
Full size table
Table 7 Limit of ranges for processing times with uniform distribution
Full size table
Table 8 Normally distributed sequence-dependent setup times for stage 1 with standard deviation 1.5
Full size table
Table 9 Normally distributed sequence-dependent setup times for stage 2 with standard deviation 1.5
Full size table
Table 10 Normally distributed sequence-dependent setup times for stage 3 with standard deviation 1.5
Full size table
Fig. 9
figure 9

Proposed ANN–GA with normal processing and setup times (maximum of processing times of each job at all stages)

Full size image
Fig. 10
figure 10

Test plot (maximum processing times of each job at all stages)

Full size image
Fig. 11
figure 11

Proposed ANN–GA with normal processing and setup times (mean of processing times of each job at all stages)

Full size image
Fig. 12
figure 12

Test plot (mean of processing times of each job at all stages)

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azadeh, A., Goodarzi, A.H., Kolaee, M.H. et al. An efficient simulation–neural network–genetic algorithm for flexible flow shops with sequence-dependent setup times, job deterioration and learning effects. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 5327–5341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3368-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3368-6

Keywords