Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing LSB embedding schemes using chaotic maps systems

  • IAPR-MedPRAI
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In our modern life, persons and institutions alike are rapidly embracing the shift toward communication via the Internet. As these entities adopt a faster and efficient communication protocol, information security techniques such as steganography and cryptography become powerful and necessary tools for conducting secure and secrecy communications. Currently, several steganography techniques have been developed, and the least significant bit (LSB) is one of these techniques which is a popular type of steganographic algorithms in the spatial domain. Indeed, as any other existing techniques, the selection of positions for data embedding within a cover signal mainly depends on a pseudorandom number generator without considering the relationship between the LSBs of the cover signal and the embedded data. In this paper and for best pixels’ positions adjustment, in which the visual distortion of the stego-image, as well as the embedding changes, becomes optimum, we propose two new position selection scenarios of LSBs-based steganography. Our new works are to improve the embedding efficiency, that is to say, select the suitable cover image pixels’ values that optimize the expected number of modifications per pixel and the visual distortion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ray PP (2015) Towards an internet of things based architectural framework for defence. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on control instrumentation communication and computational technology, pp 411–416

  2. Chambers J, Yan W, Garhwal A et al (2015) Currency security and forensics: a survey. Multimed Tools Appl 74(11):4013–4043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang CC, Lin CY, Wang YZ (2006) New image steganographic methods using run length approach. Inf Sci 176:3393–3408

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang X, Wang S (2004) Vulnerability of pixel-value differencing steganography to histogram analysis and modification for enhanced security. Pattern Recognit Signal Process Lett 25:331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zujovic J, Pappas TN, Neuhoff DL (2013) Structural texture similarity metrics for image analysis and retrieval. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(7):2545–2558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee D, Plataniotis K (2015) Towards a full-reference quality assessment for color images using directional statistics. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(11):3950–3965

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ker AD , Bohme R (2008) Revisiting weighted stego-image steganalysis. In: Electronic imaging, security, forensics, steganography, and watermarking of multimedia contents X, San Jose, CA. Proceedings SPIE, January 2731, vol 6819, pp 5:1–5:17

  8. Li X, Yang B, Cheng D, Zeng T (2009) A generalization of LSB matching. Signal Process Lett IEEE 16:69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang CH, Weng CY, Wang SJ, Sun HM (2008) Adaptive data hiding in edge areas of images with spatial LSB domain systems. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 3(3):488–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo W, Huang F, Huang J (2010) Edge adaptive image steganography based on LSB matching revisited. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 5(2):201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Volkhonskiy D, Borisenko B, Evgeny B (2016) Generative adversarial networks for image steganography. In: ICLR 2016, open review

  12. Shi H, Dong J, Wang W, Qian Y, Zhang XX (2018) Secure steganography based on generative adversarial networks. In: Advances in multimedia information processing PCM 2017. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 10735. Springer, Berlin

  13. Baluja S (2017) Hiding images in plain sight: deep steganography. In: Proceedings of advances in neural information processing systems 30 (NIPS), pp 2069–2079

  14. Zhang N, Ding S, Zhang J, Xue Y (2017) Research on point-wise gated deep networks. Appl Soft Comput 52:1210–12221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang N, Ding S (2017) Unsupervised and semi-supervised extreme learning machine with wavelet kernel for high dimension data. Memet Comput 9(2):129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang N, Ding S, Zhang J, Xue Y (2018) An overview on restricted Boltzmann machines. Neurocomputing 275:1186–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bohme R, Grossklags J (2011) The security cost of cheap user interaction. In: Proceedings of the new security paradigms workshop. ACM, New York, pp 67–82

  18. Khalil-Hani M, Marsono MN, Bakhteri R (2013) Biometric encryption based on a fuzzy vault scheme with a fast chaff generation algorithm. Future Gener Comput Syst 29:800–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Verma AK, Patvardhan C, Lakshmi CV (2015) Robust adaptive watermarking based on image contents using wavelet technique. J Image Graph Signal Process 2:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheddad A, Condell J, Curran K, McKevitt P (2010) Digital image steganography: survey and analysis of current methods. Sig Process 90:727–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malina L, Popelova L, Dzurenda P, Hajny J, Martinasek Z (2018) On feasibility of post-quantum cryptography on small devices. In: IFAC-papers on line, vol 51, no 6, pp 462–467

  22. Abdul Manaf A, Bouroujerdizade A, Mojtaba S (2016) Collusion-resistant digital video watermarking for copyright protection application. Int J Appl Eng Res 11:3484–3495

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pradhan A, Sekhar KR, Swain G (2016) Digital image steganography based on seven way pixel value differencing. Indian J Sci Technol 9(37):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee YP, Lee JC, Chen WK, Chang KC, Su IJ, Chang CP (2012) High-payload image hiding with quality recovery using tri-way pixel-value differencing. Inf Sci 191:214–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Shatanawi OM, El-Emam NN (2015) A new image steganography algorithm based on MLSB method with random pixels selection. Int J Net Secur Appl 7(2):37–53

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ker AD (2005) A general framework for the structural steganalysis of LSB replacement. In: Barni M, Herrera-Joancomart J, Katzenbeisser S, Prez-Gonzlez F (eds) Lecture notes in computer science: 7th international workshop on information hiding, Barcelona. Springer, Berlin, pp 296–311

  27. Liu Z, Xi L (2007) Image information hiding encryption using chaotic sequence. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems, pp 202–208

  28. Zhang Y, Zuo F, Zhai Z, Xiaobin C (2008) A new image encryption algorithm based on multiple chaos system. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on electronic-commerce and security (ISECS’08), pp 347–350

  29. Munir R, Riyanto B, Sutikno S, Agung WP (2007) Secure spread spectrum watermarking algorithm based on chaotic map for still images. In: Proceedings of the international conference on electrical engineering and informatics

  30. Dawei Z, Guanrong C, Wenbo L (2004) A chaos-based robust wavelet-domain watermarking algorithm. Chaos Solut Fractals 22(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chergui O, Bendjenna H, Meraoumia A, Patnaik S (2018) Can a chaos system provide secure communication over insecure networks? Online automatic teller machine services as a case study. J Electron Imaging 27(3):033045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ye G, Wong KW (2012) An efficient chaotic image encryption algorithm based on a generalized Arnold map. Nonlinear Dyn 69(4):2079–2087

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Komarasamy G, Wahi A (2012) An optimized K-means clustering technique using Bat algorithm. Eur J Sci Res 84(2):263–273

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yang XS (2010) A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. In: Gonzalez JR et al (eds) Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NISCO 2010), vol 284. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu Y-T, Shih FY (2006) Genetic algorithm based methodology for breaking the steganalytic systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 36(1):24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shao-Hui L, Tian-Hang C, Hong-Xun Y, Wen G (2004) A variable depth LSB data hiding technique in images. In: Proceedings of 2004 international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, vol 7, pp 3990–3994

  38. Fridrich J, Lisonek P, Soukal D (2007) On steganographic embedding efficiency. In: Camenisch J, Collberg C, Johnson N, Sallee P (eds) Information hiding. Springer, Berlin, pp 282–296

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Westfeld A, Pfitzmann A (2001) High capacity despite better steganalysis (F5-a steganographic algorithm). In: Information hiding, 4th international workshop, pp 289–302

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable and helpful comments. This research has been carried out within the PRFU project (Grant: A01L08UN120120180001) of the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Larbi Tebessi, Tebessa. The authors thank the staff of LAMIS laboratory for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Mathematics, Informatics and Systems (LAMIS), University of Larbi Tebessi, Tebessa, Algeria

    Lakhdar Laimeche, Abdallah Meraoumia & Hakim Bendjenna

Authors
  1. Lakhdar Laimeche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdallah Meraoumia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hakim Bendjenna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lakhdar Laimeche.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laimeche, L., Meraoumia, A. & Bendjenna, H. Enhancing LSB embedding schemes using chaotic maps systems. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 16605–16623 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04523-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04523-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation