Skip to main content
Log in

Analysing wear behaviour of Al–CaCO3 composites using ANN and Sugeno-type fuzzy inference systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design of experiment for the development of stir cast calcium carbonate-reinforced aluminium composite is a search for optimum combination of material and process control parameters for best physical and mechanical properties. A soft-computing model can accurately learn the complex interactions between process parameters to provide great insights in the development of this composite. This paper demonstrates and analyses the potential of artificial neural network (ANN) and Sugeno-type fuzzy inference systems (FIS) for wear behaviour prediction of calcium carbonate-reinforced aluminium composites. The models were trained with data collected from the experiment. The data consist of filler particle size of 150 μm with weights fractions varied from 0 to 25 wt%, in step of 5. Wear test data at different time of contacts (30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 s) and variable loads of 2.27 N, 4.54 N and 6.80 N were collected, resulting to 120 length vectors. Comparing the experimental results of wear test with those predicted using the ANN and Sugeno-type FIS, the integration of calcium carbonate particulate enhanced the wear characteristics of Al matrix up to 200%. On the use of back-propagation neural network with 4–3–1 architecture for wear prediction, the Levenberg–Marquardt training algorithm performs better. For Sugeno-type FIS, the Gaussian membership function resulted to the best prediction of wear rate. When ANN and Sugeno-type FIS performance on the test set were analysed based on some statistical parameters, the later returned an R2 value of 0.9775 as against ANN’s value of 0.3684. The predicted wear rate using ANFIS with Gaussian membership functions was in good agreement with the experimental values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bodunrin MO, Alaneme KK, Chown LH (2015) Aluminium matrix hybrid composites: a review of reinforcement philosophies; mechanical, corrosion and tribological characteristics. J Mater Res Technol 4(4):434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2016) TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Comput Appl 27(3):727–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burkinshaw SM, Jeong DS (2012) The dyeing of poly (lactic acid) fibres with disperse dyes using ultrasound: part 1—initial studies. Dyes Pigm 92(3):1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kountouras DT, Stergioudi F, Tsouknidas A, Vogiatzis CA, Skolianos SM (2015) Properties of high volume fraction fly Ash/Al alloy composites produced by infiltration process. J Mater Eng Perform 24(9):3315–3322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moses JJ, Dinaharan I, Sekhar SJ (2016) Prediction of influence of process parameters on tensile strength of AA6061/TiC aluminum matrix composites produced using stir casting. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 26(6):1498–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Agbeleye AA, Esezobor DE, Agunsoye JO, Balogun SA, Sosimi AA (2018) Prediction of the abrasive wear behaviour of heat-treated aluminium-clay composites using an artificial neural network. J Taibah Univ Sci 12(2):235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akbari MK, Baharvandi HR, Shirvanimoghaddam K (2015) Tensile and fracture behavior of nano/micro TiB2 particle reinforced casting A356 aluminum alloy composites. Mater Des (1980–2015) 66:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazahery A, Shabani MO (2012) Mechanical properties of squeeze-cast A356 composites reinforced with B4C particulates. J Mater Eng Perform 21(2):247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thapliyal S, Dwivedi DK (2016) Study of the effect of friction stir processing of the sliding wear behavior of cast NiAl bronze: a statistical analysis. Tribol Int 1(97):124–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Özyürek D, Kalyon A, Yıldırım M, Tuncay T, Çiftçi İ (2014) Experimental investigation and prediction of wear properties of Al/SiC metal matrix composites produced by thixomoulding method using artificial neural networks. Mater Des 1(63):270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassan SB, Aigbodion VS (2015) Effects of eggshell on the microstructures and properties of Al–Cu–Mg/eggshell particulate composites. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 27(1):49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kavimani V, Prakash KS, Thankachan T (2017) Surface characterization and specific wear rate prediction of r-GO/AZ31 composite under dry sliding wear condition. Surf Interfaces 1(6):143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao S, Rodrigues LL (2018) Comparative analysis of simulation of different ANN algorithms for predicting drill flank wear in the machining of GFRP composites. Int J Appl Eng Res 13(6):4102–4108

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prajapati DK, Tiwari M (2017) Use of artificial neural network (ANN) to determining surface parameters, friction and wear during pin-on-disc tribotesting. In: Hwang YL, Horng JH (eds) Key engineering materials 2017. Trans Tech Publications, vol 739, pp 87–95. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.739.87

  15. Shirvanimoghaddam K, Khayyam H, Abdizadeh H, Akbari MK, Pakseresht AH, Ghasali E, Naebe M (2016) Boron carbide reinforced aluminium matrix composite: physical, mechanical characterization and mathematical modelling. Mater Sci Eng A 21(658):135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vijayaraghavan V, Castagne S, Srivastava S, Qin CZ (2017) State-of-the-art in experimental and numerical modeling of surface characterization of components in mass finishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(9–12):2885–2899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Senthil Kumar P, Manisekar K, Narayanasamy R (2014) Experimental and prediction of abrasive wear behavior of sintered Cu-SiC composites containing graphite by using artificial neural networks. Tribol Trans 57(3):455–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ikpambese KK, Lawrence EA (2018) Comparative analysis of multiple linear regression and artificial neural network for predicting friction and wear of automotive brake pads produced from palm kernel shell. Tribol Ind 40(4):565–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gurgenc T (2019) Microstructure, mechanical properties and ELM based wear loss prediction of plasma sprayed ZrO2–MgO coatings on a magnesium alloy. Mater Test 61(8):787–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin JL, Lin CL (2002) The use of the orthogonal array with grey relational analysis to optimize the electrical discharge machining process with multiple performance characteristics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(2):237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Salemi A, Mikaeil R, Haghshenas SS (2018) Integration of finite difference method and genetic algorithm to seismic analysis of circular shallow tunnels (case study: Tabriz urban railway tunnels). KSCE J Civ Eng 22(5):1978–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koker R, Altinkok N, Demir A (2007) Neural network-based prediction of mechanical properties of particulate reinforced metal matrix composites using various training algorithms. Mater Des 28(2):616–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Sosimi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sosimi, A.A., Gbenebor, O.P., Oyerinde, O. et al. Analysing wear behaviour of Al–CaCO3 composites using ANN and Sugeno-type fuzzy inference systems. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 13453–13464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04753-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04753-6

Keywords

Navigation