Skip to main content
Log in

Twin-parametric margin support vector machine with truncated pinball loss

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel classifier termed as twin-parametric margin support vector machine with truncated pinball loss (TPin-TSVM), which is motivated by the twin-parametric margin support vector machine (TPMSVM). The proposed TPin-TSVM has the following characteristics. Firstly, it can preserve both sparsity and feature noise insensitivity simultaneously, because it deals with the quantile distance which makes it less sensitive to noises, and most of the correctly classified samples are given equal penalties which makes it have the precious sparsity. Secondly, it is a non-differentiable non-convex optimization problem, we adopt the popular and effective concave–convex procedure (CCCP) to solve it. In each iteration of CCCP, the TPMSVM is utilized as a core of our TPin-TSVM, because it determines two nonparallel hyperplanes by solving two smaller sized quadratic programming problems, which greatly improves the computational speed. Thirdly, we investigate its theoretical properties of noise insensitivity and sparsity, and the proposed TPin-TSVM realizes the between-class distance maximization, within-class scatter and misclassification error minimization together. The experiments on two artificial datasets also verify the properties. We perform numerical experiments on thirty-five benchmark datasets to investigate the validity of our proposed algorithm. Experimental results indicate that our algorithm yields the comparable generalization performance compared with three state-of-the-art algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets.html.

  2. https://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm/.

References

  1. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharan RV, Moir TJ (2015) Noise robust audio surveillance using reduced spectrogram image feature and one-against-all SVM. Neurocomputing 158:90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nayak RK, Mishra D, Rath AK (2019) An optimized SVM-k-NN currency exchange forecasting model for Indian currency market. Neural Comput Appl 31:2995–3021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang X, Shi L, Suykens JAK (2014) Support vector machine classifier with pinball loss. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 36:984–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu Y, Yang Z, Pan X (2017) A novel twin support-vector machine with pinball loss. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28:359–370

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Reshma RNK, Pal A, Chandra S (2018) Generalized pinball loss SVMs. Neurocomputing 322:151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanveer M, Sharma A, Suganthan PN (2019) General twin support vector machine with pinball loss function. Inf Sci 494:311–327

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Shen X, Niu L, Qi Z, Tian Y (2017) Support vector machine classifier with truncated pinball loss. Pattern Recognit 68:199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuille A, Rangarajan A (2003) The concave–convex procedure. Neural Comput 15(4):915–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lipp T, Boyd S (2014) Variations and extension of the convex–concave procedure. Optim Eng 1–25

  11. Jayadeva Khemchandani R, Chandra S (2007) Twin support vector machines for pattern classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29:905–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomar D, Agarwal S (2015) Twin support vector machine: a review from 2007 to 2014. Egypt Inform J 16(1):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar MA, Gopal M (2009) Least squares twin support vector machines for pattern classification. Expert Syst Appl 36:7535–7543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khemchandani R, Saigal P, Chandra S (2016) Improvements on \(\nu\)-twin support vector machine. Neural Netw 79:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parastalooi N, Amiri A, Aliheidari P (2016) Modified twin support vector regression. Neurocomputing 211:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. López J, Maldonado S (2018) Robust twin support vector regression via second-order cone programming. Knowl Based Syst 152:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mello AR, Stemmer MR, Koerich AL (2020) Incremental and decremental fuzzy bounded twin support vector machine. Inf Sci 526:20–38

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Richhariya B, Tanveer M (2020) A reduced universum twin support vector machine for class imbalance learning. Pattern Recognit 102:107150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peng X (2011) TPMSVM: a novel twin parametric-margin support vector machine for pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit 44:2678–2692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rastogi Née Khemchandani R, Saigal P, Chandra S (2018) Angle-based twin parametric-margin support vector machine for pattern classification. Knowl-Based Syst 139:64–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ripley BD (1996) Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomar D, Agarwal S (2015) A comparison on multi-class classification methods based on least squares twin support vector machine. Knowl-Based Syst 81:131–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6(2):65–70

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Demiar J, Schuurmans D (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7(1):1–30

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. García S, Fernández A, Luengo J, Herrera F (2010) Advanced nonparametric tests for multiple comparisons in the design of experiments in computational intelligence and data mining: experimental analysis of power. Inf Sci 180:2044–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J (2010) Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found Trends Mach Learn 3(3):1–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. BLX201928), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11671010) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 4172035). The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers, which have improved the presentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhijian Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Xu, Y. & Zhou, Z. Twin-parametric margin support vector machine with truncated pinball loss. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 3781–3798 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05225-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05225-7

Keywords

Navigation