Skip to main content
Log in

A better robustness and fast convergence zeroing neural network for solving dynamic nonlinear equations

  • S.I. : Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a better fast convergence zeroing neural network (BFCZNN) model with a new activation function (AF) for solving dynamic nonlinear equations (DNE) and applying to control of robot manipulator is presented. The proposed BFCZNN model not only finds the solutions of DNE in fixed time, but also has better robustness than most of the previously reported studies. The numerical simulation results of the proposed BFCZNN and the previously reported robust nonlinear zeroing neural network (RNZNN) for solving third-order DNE in the same condition are presented to demonstrate the better robustness of our new BFCZNN model. Moreover, a successful kinematic control of robot manipulator of our new BFCZNN model is used to verify the realistic availability of the proposed BFCZNN model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo D, Zhang Y (2015) ZNN for solving online time-varying linear matrix–vector inequality via equality conversion. Appl Math Comput 259:327–338

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiao L, Zhang Y (2014) Solving time-varying inverse kinematics problem of wheeled mobile manipulators using Zhang neural network with exponential convergence. Nonlinear Dyn 76(2):1543–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li S, Zhang Y, Jin L (2017) Kinematic control of redundant manipulators using neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28(10):2243–2254

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ngoc PHA, Anh TT (2019) Stability of nonlinear Volterra equations and applications. Appl Math Comput 341:1–14

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Peng J, Wang J, Wang Y (2011) Neural network based robust hybrid control for robotic system: an H∞ approach. Nonlinear Dyn 65(4):421–431

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Jin L, Zhang Y (2015) Discrete-time Zhang neural network for online time-varying nonlinear optimization with application to manipulator motion generation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(7):1525–1531

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chun C (2006) Construction of Newton-like iteration methods for solving nonlinear equations. Numerische Mathematik 104(3):297–315

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbasbandy S (2003) Improving Newton-Raphson method for nonlinear equations by modified Adomian decomposition method. Appl Math Comput 145(2–3):887–893

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma JR (2005) A composite third order Newton-Steffensen method for solving nonlinear equations. Appl Mathe Comput 169(1):242–246

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ujevic N (2006) A method for solving nonlinear equations. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 174(2): 1416-1426

  11. Wang J, Chen L, Guo Q (2017) Iterative solution of the dynamic responses of locally nonlinear structures with drift. Nonlinear Dyn 88(3):1551–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Tang, L. Jiang, Y. Hou and R. Wang, (2017) "Contactless Fingerprint Image Enhancement Algorithm Based on Hessian Matrix and STFT," 2017 2nd International Conference on Multimedia and Image Processing (ICMIP), Wuhan, pp. 156-160, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIP.2017.65

  13. Amiri A, Cordero A, Darvishi MT et al (2019) A fast algorithm to solve systems of nonlinear equations. J Comput Appl Math 354:242–258

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Dai P, Wu Q, Wu Y, Liu W (2018) Modified Newton-PSS method to solve nonlinear equations. Appl Math Lett 86:305–312

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Birgin EG, Martínez JM (2019) A Newton-like method with mixed factorizations and cubic regularization for unconstrained minimization. Comput Optim Appl 73(3):707–753

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Saheya B, Chen GQ, Sui YK et al (2016) A new Newton-like method for solving nonlinear equations. SpringerPlus 5(1):1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma JR, Arora H (2016) Improved Newton-like methods for solving systems of nonlinear equations. Sema J 74(2):1–17

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Madhu K, Jayaraman J (2016) Some higher order Newton-like methods for solving system of nonlinear equations and its applications. Int J Appl Comput Math 1–18:2016

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ding F, Zhang H (2014) Brief Paper - Gradient-based iterative algorithm for a class of the coupled matrix equations related to control systems. IET Control Theory Appl 8(15):1588–1595

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Z, Li Z, Zhang Y et al (2015) Neural-Dynamic-method-based dual-arm CMG scheme with time-varying constraints applied to humanoid robots. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(12):3251–3262

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Li S, Zhang Y, Jin L (2017) Kinematic control of redundant manipulators using neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28(10):2243–2254

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Xiao L, Liao B, Li S et al (2018) Design and analysis of FTZNN applied to the real-time solution of a Nonstationary Lyapunov equation and tracking control of a wheeled mobile manipulator. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 14(5):98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Y, Ge SS (2005) Design and analysis of a general recurrent neural network model for time-varying matrix inversion. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw 16(6):1477–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen K, Yi C (2016) Robustness analysis of a hybrid of recursive neural dynamics for online matrix inversion. Appl Math Comput 273:969–975

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen K (2013) Recurrent implicit dynamics for online matrix inversion. Appl Math Comput 219:10218–10224

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Y, Ge SS (2005) Design and analysis of a general recurrent neural network model for time-varying matrix inversion. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16:1477–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li S, Chen S, Liu B (2013) Accelerating a recurrent neural network finite time convergence for solving time-varying Sylvester equation by using signbi-power activation function. Neural Proc Lett 37:189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiao L, Liao B (2016) A convergence-accelerated Zhang neural network and its solution application to Lyapunov equation. Neurocomputing 193:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu F, Liu L, Xiao L, Li K, Cai S (2019) A robust and fixed-time zeroing neural dynamics for computing time-variant nonlinear equation using a novel nonlinear activation function. Neurocomputing 350:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jin Jie, Gong Jianqiang (2020) An interference-tolerant fast convergence zeroing neural network for dynamic matrix inversion and its application to mobile manipulator path tracking. Alex Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiao L, Zhang Y (2014) A new performance index for the repetitive motion of mobile manipulators. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(2):280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shi Y, Jin L, Li S, Qiang J (2020) Proposing, developing and verification of a novel discrete-time zeroing neural network for solving future augmented Sylvester matrix equation. J Franklin Institute 357(6):636–3655

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi Y, Zhang Y (2020) New discrete-time models of zeroing neural network solving systems of time-variant linear and nonlinear inequalities. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern: Syst 50(2):565–576

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Y. Shi, L. Jin, S. Li, J. Li, J. (2020) Qiang, D. K. Gerontitis, Novel Discrete-Time Recurrent Neural Networks Handling Discrete-Form Time-Variant Multi-Augmented Sylvester Matrix Problems and Manipulator Application, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3028136.

  35. Xiao L, Zhang Y (2014) A new performance index for the repetitive motion of mobile manipulators. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(2):280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jin J, Zhao L, Li M et al (2020) Improved zeroing neural networks for finite time solving nonlinear equations. Neural Comput Appl 32:4151–4160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xiao L (2019) A finite-time convergent Zhang neural network and its application to real-time matrix square root finding. Neural Comput Appl 31:793–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Jin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, J., Jin, J. A better robustness and fast convergence zeroing neural network for solving dynamic nonlinear equations. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 77–87 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05617-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05617-9

Keywords

Navigation