Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interactivity of English online learning based on neural network

  • Special Issue on Multi-modal Information Learning and Analytics on Big Data
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The operation of the mobile interactive autonomous learning system injects advanced management technology and scientific and reasonable management system for the effective management and arrangement of the school's teaching, enables students to conduct autonomous learning in their spare time, makes full use of students' fragmented time, and improves students' learning enthusiasm and efficiency. Based on the neural network algorithm, this paper constructs an English network learning interactive evaluation model, studies the influence of the flattening layer in the convolutional neural network structure on the structural complexity, and then proposes spatial pyramid weighted average pooling to optimize the traditional flattened layer. Moreover, this paper evaluates RSPP from three aspects: space complexity, training time-consuming, and accuracy. In addition, this paper designs two types of integrated convolutional neural networks, namely Bagging integration and snapshot integration. Finally, this paper evaluates the performance of the model through experiments and counts the experimental results. The research results show that the model constructed in this paper has a certain effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qian Q, Jin R, Yi J et al (2015) Efficient distance metric learning by adaptive sampling and mini-batch stochastic gradient descent (SGD). Mach Learn 99(3):353–372

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Dong H, Gong S, Liu C et al (2017) Large margin relative distance learning for person re-identification. IET Comput Vis 11(6):455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Delgaty L (2015) Twelve tips for academic role and institutional change in distance learning. Med Teacher 37(1):41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stefanovic M, Tadic D, Nestic S et al (2015) An assessment of distance learning laboratory objectives for control engineering education. Comput Appl Eng Educ 23(2):191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Remesh BP (2015) Developing open and distance learning programme in labour and development: results of a needs assessment study. J Nat Hist 196(29):265–291

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu P, Low SP, Liu JY et al (2015) Critical success factors in distance learning construction programs at Central Queensland University: students’ perspective. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract 141(1):05014003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ye HJ, Zhan DC, Jiang Y (2019) Fast generalization rates for distance metric learning: improved theoretical analysis for smooth strongly convex distance metric learning. Mach Learn 108(2):267–295

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo Y, Wen Y, Liu T et al (2019) Transferring knowledge fragments for learning distance metric from a heterogeneous domain. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 41(4):1013–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu CC, Kung CH, Jheng JJ et al (2019) Unsupervised distance learning for extended self-organizing map and visualization of mixed-type data. Intell Data Anal 23(4):799–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Linhares RN, Alcântara CMG, Gonçalves EÁ et al (2017) Teaching evaluation by teachers from Brazil and Portugal: a comparative analysis. Am J Educ Res 5(5):546–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang N (2017) Analysis and design of university teaching evaluation system based on JSP platform. Int J Educ Manag Eng 7(3):43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu S, Chen P (2015) Research on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in practice teaching assessment of computer majors. Int J Modern Educ Comput Sci 7(11):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou L, Li H, Sun K (2016) Teaching performance evaluation by means of a hierarchical multifactorial evaluation model based on type-2 fuzzy sets. Appl Intell 46(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porozovs J, Liepniece L, Voita D (2015) Evaluation of the teaching methods used in secondary school biology lessons. Nephron Clin Pract 7(1):60–66

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oliveros MA, García A, Valdez B (2015) Evaluation of a teaching sequence regarding science, technology and society values in higher education. Creative Educ 6(16):1768–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cerón MS, del Sagrario Corte Cruz FM (2015) The evaluation of teaching: some consequences for Latin America. Rev Mex Investig Educ 20(67):1233–1253

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li A, Li K, Ge Z (2015) Application of data mining in the colleges’ in-class teaching quality evaluation system. J Comput 10(3):166–175

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Brkovic M, Chiles P (2016) ‘Spector—the sustainability inspector’: participatory teaching, learning and evaluation game for architects, architecture students and pupils. Facta Univ 14(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reisenwitz TH (2015) Student evaluation of teaching: an investigation of nonresponse bias in an online context. J Mark Educ 38(4):139–144

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang Y, Wang Y (2016) Evaluation of teaching quality of public physical education in colleges based on the fuzzy evaluation theory. J Comput Theor Nanosci 13(12):9848–9851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Royal K (2016) A guide for making valid interpretations of student evaluation of teaching (SET) results. J Vet Med Educ 44(2):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eckler U, Greisberger A, Höhne F et al (2017) Blended learning versus traditional teaching–learning–setting: evaluation of cognitive and affective learning outcomes for the inter-professional field of occupational medicine and prevention. Nephron Clin Pract 4(2):109–121

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garofalo F, Mota-Moya P, Munday A et al (2017) Total extraperitoneal hernia repair: residency teaching program and outcome evaluation. World J Surg 41(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao H (2015) College physics teaching model design and evaluation research of students’ seriousness. Open Cybern Syst J 9(1):2017–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tran ND (2015) Reconceptualisation of approaches to teaching evaluation in higher education. Issues Educ Res 25(1):50–61

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the scholarship awarded to Xiyao Hong from China Scholarship Council (CSC, 201808440641) for her academic visiting at the University of Manchester (Manchester, UK) during the academic year 2018–2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou, 510521, Guangdong Province, China

    Xiyao Hong

Authors
  1. Xiyao Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiyao Hong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, X. Interactivity of English online learning based on neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 3349–3364 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05701-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05701-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation