Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research on the effectiveness of English online learning based on neural network

  • S.I: Cognitive-inspired Computing and Applications
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to overcome the shortcomings of the current English network learning system, based on the neural network algorithm, this paper constructs an intelligent English network learning system based on the improved algorithm. Moreover, by analyzing the coupling between recurrent neural networks by contrast methods, this paper infers the coupling between recurrent neural networks. Moreover, this paper studies the continuous attractors of the autoencoder neural network and studies the continuous attractors of different types of autoencoder models. On this basis, this paper expands the existing model, adds the module of the interaction between the external input and the visible layer and studies the conditions required for the continuous attractor of the autoencoder model. In addition, on the basis of actual needs, this paper constructs the basic structure of the model and integrates it into the improved algorithm proposed in this paper to realize English online intelligent learning. Finally, this paper designs experiments to analyze the practical effects of this model and analyzes the experimental results through mathematical statistics. The research results show that the English network learning system constructed in this paper is effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Babu Premesh (2015) Developing Open and Distance Learning Programme in Labour and Development: Results of a Needs Assessment Study. Journal of natural history. 196(29):265–291

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brkovic M, Chiles P (2016) ‘Spector - the sustainability inspector’: Participatory teaching, learning and evaluation game for architects, architecture students and pupils[J]. Facta Universitatis 14(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delgaty L (2015) Twelve tips for academic role and institutional change in distance learning[J]. Med Teach 37(1):41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dong H, Gong S, Liu C et al (2017) Large margin relative distance learning for person re-identification[J]. IET Comput Vision 11(6):455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eckler U, Greisberger A, Höhne Franziska et al (2017) Blended learning versus traditional teaching-learning-setting: Evaluation of cognitive and affective learning outcomes for the inter-professional field of occupational medicine and prevention / Blended Learning versus traditionelles Lehr-Lernsetting: Evaluierung von kognitiven und affektiven Lernergebnissen für das interprofessionelle Arbeitsfeld Arbeitsmedizin und Prävention[J]. Nephron Clinical Practice. 4(2):109–121

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garofalo F, Mota-Moya P, Munday A et al (2017) Total Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair: Residency Teaching Program and Outcome Evaluation. World journal of surgery. 41(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu CC, Kung CH, Jheng JJ et al (2019) Unsupervised distance learning for extended self-organizing map and visualization of mixed-type data[J]. Intelligent Data Analysis 23(4):799–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang Y, Wang Y (2016) Evaluation of Teaching Quality of Public Physical Education in Colleges Based on the Fuzzy Evaluation Theory[J]. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoence 13(12):9848–9851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li A, Li K, Ge Z (2015) Application of Data Mining in the Colleges’ in-Class Teaching Quality Evaluation System[J]. Journal of Computers 10(3):166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Linhares RN, Alcântara Caio Mário Guimarães, Gonçalves Everton Ávila et al (2017) Teaching Evaluation by Teachers from Brazil and Portugal: A Comparative Analysis[J]. American Journal of Educational Research. 5(5):546–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu S, Chen P (2015) Research on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation in Practice Teaching Assessment of Computer Majors[J]. International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science 7(11):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo Y, Wen Y, Liu T et al (2019) Transferring Knowledge Fragments for Learning Distance Metric from a Heterogeneous Domain[J]. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 41(4):1013–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cerón Manuel Sánchez, María Francisca, del Sagrario Corte Cruz (2015) The Evaluation of Teaching: Some Consequences for Latin America[J]. Revista Mexicana De Investigacion Educativa. 20(67):1233–1253

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oliveros María Amparo, García Alejandra, Valdez Benjamín (2015) Evaluation of a Teaching Sequence Regarding Science, Technology and Society Values in Higher Education[J]. Creative Education. 6(16):1768–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tran ND (2015) Reconceptualisation of approaches to teaching evaluation in higher education[J]. Issues in educational research. 25(1):50–61

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang N (2017) Analysis and Design of University Teaching Evaluation System Based on JSP Platform[J]. International Journal of Education & Management Engineering 7(3):43–50

    Google Scholar 

  17. Porozovs J, Liepniece L, Voita D (2015) Evaluation of the Teaching Methods Used in Secondary School Biology Lessons[J]. Nephron Clin Pract 7(1):60–66

    Google Scholar 

  18. Qian Q, Jin R, Yi J et al (2015) Efficient distance metric learning by adaptive sampling and mini-batch stochastic gradient descent (SGD)[J]. Machine Learning 99(3):353–372

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Reisenwitz Timothy H (2015) Student evaluation of teaching: an investigation of nonresponse bias in an online context[J]. Journal of marketing education. 38(4):139–144

    Google Scholar 

  20. Royal K (2016) A Guide for Making Valid Interpretations of Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) Results[J]. J Vet Med Educ 44(2):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stefanovic M, Tadic D, Nestic S et al (2015) An Assessment of Distance Learning Laboratory Objectives for Control Engineering Education[J]. Comput Appl Eng Educ 23(2):191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu P, Low SP, Liu JY et al (2015) Critical Success Factors in Distance Learning Construction Programs at Central Queensland University: Students’ Perspective[J]. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 141(1):05014003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ye HJ, Zhan DC, Jiang Y (2019) Fast generalization rates for distance metric learning: Improved theoretical analysis for smooth strongly convex distance metric learning[J]. Machine Learning 108(2):267–295

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao H (2015) College Physics Teaching Model Design and Evaluation Research ofStudents’ Seriousness[J]. Open Cybernetics & Systemics Journal 9(1):2017–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou L, Li H, Sun K (2016) Teaching performance evaluation by means of a hierarchical multifactorial evaluation model based on type-2 fuzzy sets[J]. Appl Intell 46(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by “Industry-University Cooperative Education Project” from the Ministry of Education, China (Assessment on user experience of intelligent cloud products oriented to College English course, Grant No. 201902031009)” and Guangdong Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science (Grant No. GD20WZX02-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Foreign Language College, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

    Nianfan Peng

  2. Faculty of English Language and Culture, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

    Nianfan Peng

Authors
  1. Nianfan Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nianfan Peng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, N. Research on the effectiveness of English online learning based on neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 2543–2554 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05855-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05855-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation