Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A new modified grey wolf optimization algorithm proposal for a fundamental engineering problem in robotics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the solution of inverse kinematics, which is the most fundamental problem in the field of robotics, is handled with the grey wolf optimization algorithm. Grey wolves belong to the Canis Lupus species and they act in a number of organization and cooperation while hunting in swarm in nature. Thanks to this heuristic technique, which was created by transferring this collaboration first to the algorithm and then to the code, many engineering problems were quickly solved. Similarly, in this study, inverse kinematics solution, which is an engineering problem, was solved with the grey wolf swarm optimization technique. The results are given in comparison with the traditional grey wolf algorithm and the modified grey wolf algorithm obtained by improving one of the control parameters of this algorithm and with other swarm-based algorithms. According to these results, it has been clearly observed that the grey wolf algorithm produces similar results with other swarm-based algorithms, but the modified grey wolf algorithm produces better values. This shows that the grey wolf optimization algorithm can achieve much better convergence by modifying or strengthening it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Yang XS (2014) Swarm intelligence based algorithms: a critical analysis. Evol Intel 7:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1991) Distributed optimization by ant colonies. In: European conference on artificial life, vol 134, p 142

  3. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: International conference on neural networks, pp 1942–1948

  4. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2008) On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 8:687–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang XS (2013) Multiobjective firefly algorithm for continuous optimization. Eng Comput 29:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ribeiro JM, et al (2017) Comparison of PID controller tuning methods: analytical/classical techniques versus optimization algorithms. In: IEEE 18th international Carpathian control conference (ICCC), pp 533–538

  7. Doma MI (2013) Particle swarm optimization in comparison with classical optimization for GPS network design. J Geod Sci 3:250–257

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang XS, Deb S (2014) Cuckoo search: recent advances and applications. Neural Comput Appl 24(1):169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iakovlev R, Denisov A, Prakapovich R (2020) Iterative method for solving the inverse kinematics problem of multi-link robotic systems with rotational joints. In: International conference on electromechanics and robotics, pp 237–251

  10. Dereli S, Köker R (2020) A meta-heuristic proposal for inverse kinematics solution of 7-DOF serial robotic manipulator: quantum behaved particle swarm algorithm. Artif Intell Rev 53:949–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ren H, Ben-Tzvi P (2020) Learning inverse kinematics and dynamics of a robotic manipulator using generative adversarial networks. Robot Autonom Syst 124:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bai L et al (2019) Appl Sci 9:546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajaa R, Dutta A, Dasgupta B (2019) Learning framework for inverse kinematics of a highly redundant mobile manipulator. Robot Autonom Syst 120:103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2019.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Toz M (2020) Chaos-based Vortex Search algorithm for solving inverse kinematics problem of serial robot manipulators with offset wrist. Appl Soft Comput 89:106074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ram RV, Pathak PM, Junco SJ (2019) Inverse kinematics of mobile manipulator using bidirectional particle swarm optimization by manipulator decoupling. Mech Mach Theory 131:385–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dereli S, Köker R (2020) Simulation based calculation of the inverse kinematics solution of 7-DOF robot manipulator using artificial bee colony algorithm. SN Appl Sci 2(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dereli S, Köker R (2020) Calculation of the inverse kinematics solution of the 7-DOF redundant robot manipulator by the firefly algorithm and statistical analysis of the results in terms of speed and accuracy. Inverse Problem Sci Eng 28:601–613

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang L, Xiao N (2019) A novel artificial bee colony algorithm for inverse kinematics calculation of 7-DOF serial manipulators. Soft Comput 23:3269–3277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. El-Sherbiny A, Elhosseini MA, Haikal AY (2018) A new ABC variant for solving inverse kinematics problem in 5 DOF robot arm. Appl Soft Comput 73:24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pérez L et al (2019) Industrial robot control and operator training using virtual reality interfaces. Comput Ind 109:114–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu H, Wang L (2020) Remote human–robot collaboration: a CYBEr–physical system application for hazard manufacturing environment. J Manuf Syst 54:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Iliukhin VN et al (2017) The modeling of inverse kinematics for 5 DOF manipulator. Proc Eng 176:498–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Su H et al (2018) Safety-enhanced collaborative framework for tele-operated minimally invasive surgery using a 7-DoF torque-controlled robot. Int J Control Autom Syst 16:2915–2923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen X, Zhao B, Wang Y, Xu S, Gao X (2018) Control of a 7-DOF robotic arm system with an SSVEP-based BCI. Int Neural J Syst 28(08):1850018. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065718500181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Köker R, Çakar T (2016) A neuro-genetic-simulated annealing approach to the inverse kinematics solution of robots: a simulation based study. Eng Comput 32:553–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Patil A, Kulkarni M, Aswale A (2017) Analysis of the inverse kinematics for 5 DOF robot arm using DH parameters. In: IEEE international conference on real-time computing and robotics (RCAR), pp 688–693

  27. Singh S, Singla E (2016) Realization of task-based designs involving DH parameters: a modular approach. Intel Serv Robot 9:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dereli S, Köker R (2018) IW-PSO approach to the inverse kinematics problem solution of a 7-DOF serial robot manipulator. Sigma J Eng Nat Sci 36:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  29. Edla DR, Kongara MC, Cheruku R (2019) A PSO based routing with novel fitness function for improving lifetime of WSNs. Wireless Pers Commun 104:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Malhotra R, Khanna M (2019) Dynamic selection of fitness function for software change prediction using particle swarm optimization. Inf Softw Technol 112:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. de Souza EF, Goues CL, Camilo-Junior CG (2018) A novel fitness function for automated program repair based on source code checkpoints. Genet Evolution Comput Confer 2018:1443–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Greche L, et al (2017) Comparison between Euclidean and Manhattan distance measure for facial expressions classification. In: International conference on wireless technologies, embedded and intelligent systems (WITS), pp 1–4

  33. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ozsoydan FB (2019) Effects of dominant wolves in grey wolf optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 83:105658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Al-Tashi Q, Kadir SJA, Rais HM, Mirjalili S, Alhussian H (2019) Binary optimization using hybrid grey wolf optimization for feature selection. IEEE Access 7:39496–39508. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ibrahim RA, Elaziz MA, Lu S (2018) Chaotic opposition-based grey-wolf optimization algorithm based on differential evolution and disruption operator for global optimization. Expert Syst Appl 108:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Niu P, Niu S, Chang L (2019) The defect of the Grey Wolf optimization algorithm and its verification method. Knowl-Based Syst 171:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Faris H et al (2018) Grey wolf optimizer: a review of recent variants and applications. Neural Comput Appl 30:413–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gu Q, Li X, Jiang S (2019) Hybrid genetic grey wolf algorithm for large-scale global optimization. Complexity

  40. Sharma P et al (2019) Diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using modified grey wolf optimization. Cogn Syst Res 54:100–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pradhan M, Roy PK, Pal T (2018) Oppositional based grey wolf optimization algorithm for economic dispatch problem of power system. Ain Shams Eng J 9:2015–2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Natesan G, Chokkalingam A (2019) Task scheduling in heterogeneous cloud environment using mean grey wolf optimization algorithm. ICT Express 5:110–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Khandelwal A et al (2018) Modified grey wolf optimization algorithm for transmission network expansion planning problem. Arab J Sci Eng 43:2899–2908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kalemci EN et al (2020) Design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall using Grey wolf optimization algorithm. Structures 23:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rahmani M, Komijani H, Rahman MH (2020) New sliding mode control of 2-DOF robot manipulator based on extended grey wolf optimizer. Int J Control Autom Syst 2020:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rao AM, Ramji K, Kumar TN (2018) Intelligent navigation of mobile robot using grey wolf colony optimization. Mater Today: Proc 5:19116–19125

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou Z et al (2018) Color difference classification based on optimization support vector machine of improved grey wolf algorithm. Optik 170:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Long W et al (2017) A modified augmented Lagrangian with improved grey wolf optimization to constrained optimization problems. Neural Comput Appl 28:421–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Nadimi-Shahraki MH, Taghian S, Mirjalili S (2021) An improved grey wolf optimizer for solving engineering problems. Expert Systems with Applications 166:113917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gao ZM, Zhao J (2019) An improved grey wolf optimization algorithm with variable weights. Comput Intell Neurosci 2019:2981282. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2981282

  51. Heidari AA, Pahlavani P (2017) An efficient modified grey wolf optimizer with Lévy flight for optimization tasks. Appl Soft Comput 60:115–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sun J, Feng B, Xu W (2004) Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behavior. In: Proceedings of the congress on evolutionary computation

  53. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 62:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2008) On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 5:687–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Computer Technologies and Programming, Sakarya, Turkey

    Serkan Dereli

Authors
  1. Serkan Dereli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serkan Dereli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dereli, S. A new modified grey wolf optimization algorithm proposal for a fundamental engineering problem in robotics. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 14119–14131 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06050-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06050-2

Keywords