Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Adaptive CIPCA-based fault diagnosis scheme for uncertain time-varying processes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data-driven is the use of data to drive knowledge and decisions. This has the potential to produce better results but can also suboptimal based on a misinterpretation of data, faulty data, and/or missing data. It is therefore interesting to study the problem of uncertainties in the data and how to integrate them into the models in order to improve performances. Principal component analysis (PCA) is one of the most popular data-driven approaches that is not designed to handle the uncertainty of the sensor measurements represented by interval type data. The complete information PCA (CIPCA) is one of the pioneering static approaches in the processing of interval data. Because the process operating conditions and their parameters may vary over time, as well as the oldest data that are not representative of the current process operation, a continuous update of the CIPCA model is necessary. The objective of this paper is to design an adaptive version of the CIPCA methodology for handling complex data, i.e., time-varying and interval data. At each time instant, when a new uncertain measurement of interval type is available, the CIPCA model is recursively updated, where recursive formulas for updating weighted mean and covariance matrix of interval-valued data are proposed. Indeed, the proposed CIPCA approach allows a robust and recursive representation, which improves fault detection and isolation decisions. Based on the updated CIPCA model, the interval \(T^2\) and SPE statistics are calculated and used to monitor the operating conditions of a process. A wind turbine benchmark is adopted to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed adaptive CIPCA method for fault detection and isolation in wind turbines is quite promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Patton Ron J, Frank Paul M, Clark Robert N (2013) lssues of fault diagnosis for dynamic systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tkachenko R, Izonin I (2018) Model and principles for the implementation of neural-like structures based on geometric data transformations. In: Hu Z, Petoukhov S, Dychka I, He M (eds) Advances in computer science for engineering and education. ICCSEEA advances in intelligent systems and computing. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  3. Izonin I, Tkachenko R, Kryvinska N, Tkachenko P, Gregušml M (2019) Based Multiple Linear Regression on Coefficients Identification Using Non-iterative SGTM Neural-like Structure. In: Rojas I, Joya G, Catala A (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence IWANN. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chakour C, Harkat M-F, Djeghaba M (2015) Neuronal principal component analysis for nonlinear time-varying processes monitoring, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(21). ISSN 1408–1413:2405–8963

  5. Hastie T, Stuetzle W (1989) Principal curves. J Am Stat Assoc 84(406):502–516

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kramer MA (1991) Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks. AIChE J 37(2):233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunia R, Qin SJ, Edgar TF, McAvoy TJ (1996) Identification of faulty sensors using principal component analysis. AIChE J 42(10):2797–2812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhibi et al K, A hybrid approach for process monitoring: improving data-driven methodologies with dataset size reduction and interval-valued representation. IEEE Sens J

  9. Cazes P, Chouakria A, Diday E, Schektman Y (1997) Extension de l’Analyse en Composantes Principales à des Données de Type Intervalle. Rev. Stat. Appl. 45(3):5–24

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chouakria A (1998) Extension des methodes d’analyse factorielle à des Données de type intervalle, (Ph.D. dissertation), Université Paris-Dauphine

  11. Palumbo F, Lauro NC (2003) A PCA for interval-valued data based on midpoints and radii. In: Yanai H, Okada A, Shigemasu K, Kano Y, Meulman J (Eds) New developments in psychometrics. Tokyo

  12. Huiwen Wang, Rong G, Junjie W (2012) CIPCA: complete-information-based principal component analysis for interval-valued data. Neurocomputing 86:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarek A-I, Harkat M-F, Djeghaba M, Kratz F (2018) On the application of interval PCA to process monitoring: a robust strategy for sensor FDI with new efficient control statistics. J Process Control 63:29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei X, Verhaegen M, van den Engelen T (2008) Sensor fault diagnosis of wind turbines for fault tolerant. IFAC Proc Vol 41(2):3222–3227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chouaib Chakour, Abdelhafid Benyounes, Mahmoud Boudiaf (2018) Diagnosis of uncertain nonlinear systems using interval kernel principal components analysis: application to a weather station. ISA Trans 83:126–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elshenawy Lamiaa M, Mahmoud Tarek A, Chouaib Chakour (2020) Simultaneous fault detection and diagnosis using adaptive principal component analysis and multivariate contribution analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 59(47):20798–20815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xuan Tien Doan (2005) Moving PCA For process fault detection- a performance and sensitivity study. Thesis of National university Singapore

  18. Kruger U, Xie L (2012) Advances in statistical monitoring of complex multivariate processes: with applications in industrial process control. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Li W, Yue HH, Valle-Cervantes S, Qin SJ (2000) Recursive PCA for adaptive process monitoring. J Process Control 10(5):471–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elshenawy LM, Yin S, Naik AS, Ding SX (2009) Efficient recursive principal component analysis algorithms for process monitoring. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(1):252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang X, Kruger U, Irwin GW (2005) Process monitoring approach using fast moving window PCA. Ind Eng Chem Res 44(15)

  22. Bin He Xiao, Pu Yang Yu (2008) Variable MWPCA for adaptive process monitoring. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Svante Wold (1994) Exponentially weighted moving principal components analysis and projections to latent structures. Chemome Intell Lab Syst 23:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ricardo Dunia, Joe Qin S (1998) Subspace approach to multidimensional fault identification and reconstruction. AIChE J 44(8):1813–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor John K, Cheryl Cihon (2004) Statistical techniques for data analysis. A CRC Press Company, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Chakour C (2021) Fault detection of uncertain systems based on interval data driven approach. In: Bououden S, Chadli M, Ziani S, Zelinka I (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on electrical engineering and control applications. ICEECA (2019) Lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 682. Springer, Singapore

  27. Carlo Lauro N, Verde Rosanna, Irpino Antonio (2008) Principal component analysis of symbolic data described by intervals, In: Symbolic data analysis and the SODAS software. John Wiley and Sons, 279–311

  28. Moore R (1966) Interval analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Jackson JE, Mudholkar GS (1979) Control procedures for residuals associated with principal component analysis. Technometrics 21:341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Patten classification. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Joe Qin S (2003) Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond. J Chemom 17:480–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Petr Kadlec, Ratko Grbi, Bogdan Gabrys (2011) Review of adaptation mechanisms for data-driven soft sensors. Comput Chem Eng 35:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wook Choi Sang, Martin Elaine B, Julian Morris A, In-Beum Lee (2006) Adaptive multivariate statistical process control for monitoring time-varying processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:3108–3118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alcala CF, Qin SJ (2010) Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring with Kernel principal component analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:7849–7857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Alcala CF, Qin SJ (2011) Analysis and generalization of fault diagnosis methods for process monitoring. J Process Control 21:322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Alcala CF, Qin SJ (2009) Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring. Automatica 45:1593–1600

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu Q, Chai T, Qin SJ (2012) Fault diagnosis of continuous annealing processes using a reconstruction-based method. Control Eng Pract

  38. Hongquan Ji, Xiao He, Donghua Zhou (2016) On the use of reconstruction-based contribution for fault diagnosis. J Process Control 40:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu Q, Chai T, Qin S (2012) Fault diagnosis of continuous annealing processes using a reconstruction-based method. Control Eng Pract

  40. Kerkhof PV, Vanlaer J, Gins G, Van Impe Jann FM (2013) Contribution plots for Statistical Process Control: analysis of the smearing-out effect, European Control Conference (ECC), July 17–19. Zürich, Switzerland

  41. van Engelen TG, van der Hooft EL (2003) Individual pitch control, inventory. Technical Report ECN-E-03-138. Energy Research Center of the Neder lands. Petten, the Neder lands

  42. Fogh Odgaard Peter, Jakob Stoustrup, Michel Kinnaert (2013) Fault-tolerant control of wind turbines: a benchmark model. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 21(4):1168–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hamed Badihi, Youmin Zhang, Henry Hong (2014) Wind turbine fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant torque load control against actuator faults. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 23(4):1351–1372

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shen Yin, Guang Wang, Reza Karimi Hamid (2014) Data-driven design of robust fault detection system for wind turbines. Mechatronics 24(4):298–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communications, Kasdi Merbah University, BP.511, 30 000, Ouargla, Algeria

    Chouaib Chakour & Azzedine Hamza

  2. Laboratoire d’Automatique et Informatique de Guelma (LAIG), Université 8 Mai 1945, BP 401, 24000, Guelma, Algeria

    Chouaib Chakour

  3. Department of Industrial Electronics and Control Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufiya University, 32952, Menouf, Egypt

    Lamiaa M. Elshenawy

Authors
  1. Chouaib Chakour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Azzedine Hamza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lamiaa M. Elshenawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chouaib Chakour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakour, C., Hamza, A. & Elshenawy, L.M. Adaptive CIPCA-based fault diagnosis scheme for uncertain time-varying processes. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 15413–15432 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06167-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06167-4

Keywords