Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Debris flow prediction with machine learning: smart management of urban systems and infrastructures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the interaction of debris flow with different arrangements of buildings and providing an accurate and real-time predictions for the corresponding flow distribution has become a challenging task. Two parts of this problem, namely new constructions and rapid reaction, have made this as a daunting topic. Although the numerical methods can provide precise predictions, their applicability due to the above-mentioned issues is challenging as one has to redo the computations when new buildings are added. In this paper, thus, a deep learning model is developed to efficiently predict the spatiotemporal distribution of debris flow as it interacts with different building arrangements. As such, we employed U-net as the base model, which is combined with the residual network to alleviate the gradient vanishing issue. An autoregressive strategy is proposed to help the model capture the dynamics of the debris flow, where the output at the previous timestep is used as the input to predict the current timestep. A synthetic dataset based on the numerical methods is used to train the residual U-net model. The results indicate that the proposed method can predict the general trend at different timesteps, and its robustness is verified using an extensive sensitivity analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Mcardell BW (2016) Field measurements of forces in debris flows at the illgraben: implications for channel-bed erosion. Int J Eros Control Eng 9:194–198. https://doi.org/10.13101/ijece.9.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson CG, Kokelaar BP, Iverson RM et al (2012) Grain-size segregation and levee formation in geophysical mass flows. J Geophys Res Earth Surf. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benito J, Bertho Y, Ippolito I, Gondret P (2012) Stability of a granular layer on an inclined “fakir plane.” EPL. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/100/34004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ng CWW, Choi CE, Song D et al (2014) Physical modeling of baffles influence on landslide debris mobility. Landslides 12:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0476-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luong TH, Baker JL, Einav I (2020) Spread-out and slow-down of granular flows through model forests. Granul Matter 22:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-019-0980-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gray JMNT, Cui X (2007) Weak, strong and detached oblique shocks in gravity-driven granular free-surface flows. J Fluid Mech 579:113–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112007004843

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Pudasaini SP, Hutter K, Hsiau SS et al (2007) Rapid flow of dry granular materials down inclined chutes impinging on rigid walls. Phys Fluids 19:053302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2726885

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gray JMNT, Wieland M, Hutter K (1999) Gravity-driven free surface flow of granular avalanches over complex basal topography. Proc R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 455:1841–1874. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1999.0383

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouchut F, Mangeney-Castelnau A, Perthame B, Vilotte JP (2003) A new model of Saint Venant and Savage-Hutter type for gravity driven shallow water flows. Comptes Rendus Math 336:531–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-073X(03)00117-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bouchut F, Westdickenberg M (2004) Gravity driven shallow water models for arbitrary topography. Commun Math Sci 2:359–389

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Viroulet S, Baker JL, Edwards AN et al (2017) Multiple solutions for granular flow over a smooth two-dimensional bump. J Fluid Mech 815:77–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.41

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui X, Gray JMNT (2013) Gravity-driven granular free-surface flow around a circular cylinder. J Fluid Mech 720:314–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2013.42

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien JS (1986) Physical processes, rheology and modeling of mudflows. Colorado State University, US

    Google Scholar 

  14. Armanini A, Fraccarollo L, Rosatti G (2009) Two-dimensional simulation of debris flows in erodible channels. Comput Geosci 35:993–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Christen M, Buhler Y, Bartelt P, et al (2012) Integral hazard management using a unified software environment. Numerical simulation tool “RAMMS”; for gravitational natural hazards. 12th Congress INTERPRAEVENT 2012 23 to 26 April 2012 Grenoble, Fr Conference Proceedings “Protection living Sp from Nat hazards” 77–86

  16. Bai T, Tahmasebi P (2020) Hybrid geological modeling: Combining machine learning and multiple-point statistics. Comput Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bai T, Tahmasebi P (2020) Efficient and data-driven prediction of water breakthrough in subsurface systems using deep long short-term memory machine learning. Comput Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-020-10005-2

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tahmasebi P, Kamrava S, Bai T, Sahimi M (2020) Machine learning in geo- and environmental sciences: From small to large scale. Adv Water Resour 142:103619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cui H, Zhang H, Ganger GR, et al (2016) Geeps: Scalable deep learning on distributed gpus with a gpu-specialized parameter server. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on Computer Systems. pp 1–16

  20. Tan C, Sun F, Kong T, et al (2018) A survey on deep transfer learning. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer Verlag, pp 270–279

  21. Kamrava S, Tahmasebi P, Sahimi M (2021) Physics- and image-based prediction of fluid flow and transport in complex porous membranes and materials by deep learning. J Memb Sci 622:119050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamrava S, Tahmasebi P, Sahimi M (2019) Linking morphology of porous media to their macroscopic permeability by deep learning. Transp Porous Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-019-01352-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kamrava S, Sahimi M, Tahmasebi P (2020) Quantifying accuracy of stochastic methods of reconstructing complex materials by deep learning. Phys Rev E 101:043301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.043301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). pp 234–241

  25. Glorot X, Bengio Y (2010) Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. J Mach Learn Res 9:249–256

    Google Scholar 

  26. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770–778

  27. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T (2015) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, pp 431–440

  28. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556

  29. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. 32nd Int Conf Mach Learn ICML 2015 1:448–456

  30. Bottou L (2010) Large-Scale Machine Learning with Stochastic Gradient Descent. In: Proceedings of COMPSTAT’2010. Physica-Verlag HD, pp 177–186

  31. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization.

  32. Zhang L, Zhang L, Mou X, Zhang D (2011) FSIM: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Image Process 20:2378–2386. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2011.2109730

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from the University of Wyoming for this research is greatly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 82071, USA

    Tao Bai, Zhihao Jiang & Pejman Tahmasebi

Authors
  1. Tao Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhihao Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pejman Tahmasebi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pejman Tahmasebi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, T., Jiang, Z. & Tahmasebi, P. Debris flow prediction with machine learning: smart management of urban systems and infrastructures. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 15769–15779 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06197-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06197-y

Keywords